Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
24 types of Libertarian
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  24 types of Libertarian Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 21 Guests

24 types of Libertarian  This thread currently has 14,598 views. |
14 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 » Recommend Thread
CICERO
March 3, 2015, 2:35pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
   Eliminate all taxes, privatize everything, load a country up
with guns and oppose all public expenditures, you end up with Honduras.

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/0.....s_were_all_debunked/


Increase taxes, regulate all private property, eliminate all guns except for those permitted by the government, support all public expenditures, and you end up with Nazi Germany.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 105 - 200
Box A Rox
March 3, 2015, 8:27pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 106 - 200
senders
March 4, 2015, 4:40am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
USA, UK and Israel walk into the middle east, bring some guns, kill a bunch of people including fellow citizens

THERE IS NO END!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 107 - 200
CICERO
March 4, 2015, 3:58pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Nancy Pelosi walk into an oyster bar for some raw oysters  harvested from an industry regulated by the FDA.  They each eat one and get infected with Vibrio and die, along with 17 other people that die from it every year.  

Raw Oysters is the Adam Lanza of shellfish.  Ban shellfish. LOL.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 108 - 200
Box A Rox
March 4, 2015, 5:18pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Nancy Pelosi walk into an oyster bar for some raw oysters  harvested from an industry regulated by the FDA.  They each eat one and get infected with Vibrio and die, along with 17 other people that die from it every year.  

Raw Oysters is the Adam Lanza of shellfish.  Ban shellfish. LOL.


I could never understand why some people insist on eating BAIT!
If you put bait,  a clam, an oyster, or scallops on a hook and put it in the ocean,
YOU CAN CATCH SOMETHING GOOD TO EAT!!!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 109 - 200
joebxr
March 4, 2015, 5:30pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Nancy Pelosi walk into an oyster bar for some raw oysters  harvested from an industry regulated by the FDA.  They each eat one and get infected with Vibrio and die, along with 17 other people that die from it every year.  

Raw Oysters is the Adam Lanza of shellfish.  Ban shellfish. LOL.


Joebxr, Box a Rox, Bumbler and MC1 go to a restaurant together.
Waiter comes over and brings complimentary raw oysters.
All present laugh and tell waiter, "You eat them, cause we know better."
Moral of the story:  Intelligent people know that eating raw oysters (along with other
bacteria carrying food) can kill you or cause you to become severely ill, so they
just don't do it.

In comes Sissy and some of his butt buddies. Believing the wives tale about the
supposed "benefits" of raw oysters, they down a dozen each.  1 hour later in
the parking lot, Sissy and butt buddies are all on their knees retching, thankful
they are still alive.



JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 110 - 200
Box A Rox
March 4, 2015, 5:44pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from joebxr
t.

In comes Sissy and some of his butt buddies. Believing the wives tale about the
supposed "benefits" of raw oysters, they down a dozen each.  1 hour later in
the parking lot, Sissy and butt buddies are all on their knees retching, thankful
they are still alive.

Yes, they are 'still alive', but severely brain damaged from their meal.
Hence, they are rabid libertarians.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 111 - 200
CICERO
March 4, 2015, 6:09pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox

Yes, they are 'still alive', but severely brain damaged from their meal.
Hence, they are rabid libertarians.


Lol!  Rabid libertarian...imposing freedom on those that want masters.LMAO!


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 112 - 200
CICERO
March 4, 2015, 6:23pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr


Joebxr, Box a Rox, Bumbler and MC1 go to a restaurant together.
Waiter comes over and brings complimentary raw oysters.
All present laugh and tell waiter, "You eat them, cause we know better."
Moral of the story:  Intelligent people know that eating raw oysters (along with other
bacteria carrying food) can kill you or cause you to become severely ill, so they
just don't do it.


Don't you want to ban restaurants from offering raw shellfish that may cause somebody to get sick and possibly DIE!  The strain it causes on society is just too great.  People shouldn't have the right to eat a shellfish that is going to get them sick, and then use public resources like an ambulance or paramedic to treat them.  This is unfair to "society".

Just because you"know better" doesn't mean you shouldn't use the government to protect EVERYBODY from getting sick and possibly dying.  It's actually your civic responsibility to petition your government to ban food containing bacteria to be sold to the public.  



Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 113 - 200
senders
March 4, 2015, 6:26pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted Text
Public Health Officials Know: Recently Vaccinated Individuals Spread Disease
Tuesday, 3 Mar 2015 | 2:41 PM ET
Globe Newswire


Washington, D.C., March 3, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Physicians and public health officials know that recently vaccinated individuals can spread disease and that contact with the immunocompromised can be especially dangerous. For example, the Johns Hopkins Patient Guide warns the immunocompromised to "Avoid contact with children who are recently vaccinated," and to "Tell friends and family who are sick, or have recently had a live vaccine (such as chicken pox, measles, rubella, intranasal influenza, polio or smallpox) not to visit."1

A statement on the website of St. Jude's Hospital warns parents not to allow people to visit children undergoing cancer treatment if they have received oral polio or smallpox vaccines within four weeks, have received the nasal flu vaccine within one week, or have rashes after receiving the chickenpox vaccine or MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine.2

"The public health community is blaming unvaccinated children for the outbreak of measles at Disneyland, but the illnesses could just as easily have occurred due to contact with a recently vaccinated individual," says Sally Fallon Morell, president of the Weston A. Price Foundation. The Foundation promotes a healthy diet, non-toxic lifestyle and freedom of medical choice for parents and their children. "Evidence indicates that recently vaccinated individuals should be quarantined in order to protect the public."

Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.11.12

Furthermore, vaccine recipients can carry diseases in the back of their throat and infect others while displaying no symptoms of a disease.13,14,15

Both unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals are at risk from exposure to those recently vaccinated. Vaccine failure is widespread; vaccine-induced immunity is not permanent and recent outbreaks of diseases such as whooping cough, mumps and measles have occurred in fully vaccinated populations.16,17 Flu vaccine recipients become more susceptible to future infection after repeated vaccination.18,19

Adults have contracted polio from recently vaccinated infants. A father from Staten Island ended up in a wheel chair after contracting polio while changing his daughter's diaper. He received a 22.5 million dollar award in 2009. 20,21

"Vaccine failure and failure to acknowledge that live virus vaccines can spread disease have resulted in an increase in outbreaks of infectious disease in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals," says Leslie Manookian, producer of The Greater Good. "CDC should instruct physicians who administer vaccinations to inform their patients about the risks posed to others by those who've been recently vaccinated."

According to the Weston A. Price Foundation, the best protection against infectious disease is a healthy immune system, supported by adequate vitamin A and vitamin C. Well-nourished children easily recover from infectious disease and rarely suffer complications.

The number of measles deaths declined from 7575 in 1920 (10,000 per year in many years in the 1910s) to an average of 432 each year from 1958-1962.22 The vaccine was introduced in 1963. Between 2005 and 2014, there have been no deaths from measles in the U.S. and 108 deaths reported after the MMR vaccine.23

The Weston A. Price Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nutrition education foundation with the mission of disseminating accurate, science-based information on diet and health. Named after nutrition pioneer Weston A. Price, DDS, author of Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, the Washington, DC-based Foundation publishes a quarterly journal for its 15,000 members, supports 600 local chapters worldwide and hosts a yearly international conference. The Foundation phone number is (202) 363-4394(202) 363-4394, http://www.westonaprice.org, info@westonaprice.org.


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 114 - 200
senders
March 4, 2015, 6:28pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted Text
Why vaccines can't be a choice: Disease specialist
Matthew J. Belvedere     | @Matt_Belvedere
Tuesday, 3 Feb 2015 | 10:14 AM ET
CNBC.com


The measles outbreak linked to Disneyland is raising new questions about whether children should be vaccinated, with health officials and politicians fueling new debate on both sides of this issue.

"It really is not just a personal choice but a public health issue, Dr. Gail Shust, pediatrician and infectious disease specialist at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, told CNBC on Tuesday. "If a person decides not to vaccinate their child, not only are they potentially putting their child's health at risk, but they're also putting other people at risk."


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 115 - 200
joebxr
March 4, 2015, 6:37pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Don't you want to ban restaurants from offering raw shellfish that may cause somebody to get sick and possibly DIE!  The strain it causes on society is just too great.  People shouldn't have the right to eat a shellfish that is going to get them sick, and then use public resources like an ambulance or paramedic to treat them.  This is unfair to "society".

Just because you"know better" doesn't mean you shouldn't use the government to protect EVERYBODY from getting sick and possibly dying.  It's actually your civic responsibility to petition your government to ban food containing bacteria to be sold to the public.  


No Sissy, that's your opinion, distorted view and erroneous attempt at labeling.  I respect Government control when it protects me, but I also have a brain
and can decide for myself what I should or should not do (or in this case eat). It's called being an adult and making decisions
for yourself. See Government controls, for the most part, occur because of the minority idiots. The rules are intended to
protect them from themselves. The majority follow the laws, naturally, without having to have them imposed on us.
Some day when you put on big boy pants you might even grasp the concept!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 116 - 200
senders
March 4, 2015, 6:47pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

No Sissy, that's your opinion and your distorted view.  I respect Government control when it protects me, but I also have a brain
and can decide for myself what I should or should not do (or in this case eat). It's called being an adult and making decisions
for yourself. See Government controls, for the most part, occur because of the minority idiots. The rules are intended to
protect them from themselves. The majority follow the laws, naturally, without having to have them imposed on us.
Some day when you put on big boy pants you might even grasp the concept!


in that case....no laws needed because the laws of nature take care of 'weak'........simple....government is only a way to
organize everyone into their indentured little cast.....

most about property, ownership, responsibility etc....the government doesn't MAKE people responsible....it creates
penalties against laws and yet that does NOT make a person responsible, however, it does create A LOT of
government jobs and fu(king lawyers.....

so,,,,is it the government's job to religiously make a person their 'brother's keeper'?


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 117 - 200
joebxr
March 4, 2015, 6:50pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from senders


in that case....no laws needed because the laws of nature take care of 'weak'........simple....government is only a way to
organize everyone into their indentured little cast.....

most about property, ownership, responsibility etc....the government doesn't MAKE people responsible....it creates
penalties against laws and yet that does NOT make a person responsible, however, it does create A LOT of
government jobs and fu(king lawyers.....

so,,,,is it the government's job to religiously make a person their 'brother's keeper'?

Oh senders you silly delusional mixed up being.
I serve myself and have all my life.  You are attempting like
Sissy-poo to label me as you both think, rather than know.  


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 118 - 200
CICERO
March 4, 2015, 6:52pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

The majority follow the laws, naturally, without having to have them imposed on us.


Be careful...box may think you left the statist reservation.  That sounds like a tea bagging libertarian concept. .

Box argued a few weeks ago that the government needs to regulate hand washing in restaurants.lol

Nice to see you don't eat oysters, how do you keep the bacteria off your food after the prep cook that prepared your food didn't wash his hands after taking a big dump.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 119 - 200
14 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread