Actually they give it a 200,000 year difference if you read the story, 2nd there is 1 hole which looks like a foot, my driveway looks similar after a good rain Do you want to come over and give a timeline on those prints
So the print is between 600,000 to 1 million (that's million with an M!) years old and the earth is 12-14 billions (that's billion with a B!) years old. Your "god" was imagined up a few thousand years ago. Plus, your "god" is late to the party. Thousands of "gods" were imagined up before your "god" was imagined up.
Yahweh is falsified! So freakin sorry.............................NO I'M NOT. Bwahahahahahahahaha!
So the print is between 600,000 to 1 million (that's million with an M!) years old and the earth is 12-14 billions (that's billion with a B!) years old. Your "god" was imagined up a few thousand years ago. Plus, your "god" is late to the party. Thousands of "gods" were imagined up before your "god" was imagined up.
Yahweh is falsified! So freakin sorry.............................NO I'M NOT. Bwahahahahahahahaha!
So when are you coming over to estimate the prints in my driveway, by my observations and research I date them between yesterday to 400,000BC, I'm pretty confident in my timeframe as there appears to be a Nike symbol in one of them, the others appear to be older with any traces of patterns worn away
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
The foot print is already gone, what supposedly lasted 800,000 years was washed away in less then 3 weeks LMAO
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
The foot print is already gone, what supposedly lasted 800,000 years was washed away in less then 3 weeks LMAO
I wonder if Henry is a Forensic Anthropologist???
Quoted Text
Forensic anthropological techniques can be used in the recovery and analysis of human remains. A forensic anthropological analysis assesses the age, sex, stature, ancestry, and evidence for an estimate of the predominant geographical ancestry of the individual, as well as determine if the individual was affected by accidental or violent trauma or disease prior to or at the time of death. Forensic anthropologists frequently work in conjunction with forensic pathologists, odontologists, and homicide investigators to identify a decedent, discover evidence of trauma, and determine the postmortem interval.
Henry imagines 'footprints' in his driveway, and determines their age. In a court of law, his observations would be only that... an observation. A Forensic Anthropologist observing the same 'footprints' could make a statement on the validity of that footprint that would be considered expert evidence in a court of law.
If I needed to know the age of a footprint, Henry wouldn't be my choice for determining that data.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
If I needed to know the age of a footprint, Henry wouldn't be my choice for determining that data.
Why not, I could do better then 400,000 years. Since I see a nike symbol I could date it to 1964 to the present. Going by the design the print left I could date that to a series which could limit that down even further. If the impression was large or designed as a mans sneaker I could put a confident opinion on gender of the person wearing the shoe. If the shoe print was set deeper then the others I could assume the person was a heavier set fellow. If one side dragged more then the other I would say maybe the wearer suffered a injury and walked with a gimpy leg
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
A Forensic Anthropologist observing the same 'footprints' could make a statement on the validity of that footprint that would be considered expert evidence in a court of law.
If I needed to know the age of a footprint, Henry wouldn't be my choice for determining that data.
Yup, and there would be two forensic anthropologists in court, one for the defense one for the prosecution, presenting evidence that varies by 400,000 years and the jury will determine what is FACT.
It's amusing to watch otherwise normal people go off the deep end to further their agenda!
I wonder if the board doubters would consult a doctor if sick? I wonder if they would use the best science available to cure their disease? Or would they use some ancient religious book to cure their cancer??? I wonder if the board doubters would get a blood test to diagnose their disease... you know... SCIENCE, or would they take the word of a religious faith healer?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
It's amusing to watch otherwise normal people go off the deep end to further their agenda!
I wonder if the board doubters would consult a doctor if sick? I wonder if they would use the best science available to cure their disease? Or would they use some ancient religious book to cure their cancer??? I wonder if the board doubters would get a blood test to diagnose their disease... you know... SCIENCE, or would they take the word of a religious faith healer?
I wonder if the science worshipers like box would get a doctors second opinion? If so, why? All doctors are trained in science, therefor all doctors diagnosis and treatment MUST all be equal and never questioned.
If two doctors have different diagnosis's, how does the science worshiper choose? How can one doctor be wrong and one be correct? Or could they both be wrong, and there is a third option. Oh the dilemma's you are faced with.
I'm sure in this case, box would take the word of science...but which scientist? I guess it's all faith at that point;D
I wonder if the science worshipers like box would get a doctors second opinion? If so, why? All doctors are trained in science, therefor all doctors diagnosis and treatment MUST all be equal and never questioned.
If two doctors have different diagnosis's, how does the science worshiper choose? How can one doctor be wrong and one be correct? Or could they both be wrong, and there is a third option. Oh the dilemma's you are faced with.
I'm sure in this case, box would take the word of science...but which scientist? I guess it's all faith at that point;D
So in other words it is not possible for 1 doctor to have more knowledge and experience in a specific case than another, and accordingly able to offer a different path? You operate with the ill-informed opinion that all Doctors are equally knowledgeable about everything....how dumb!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
what did we(humans) evolve from....fish?....apes?.....why did we stop evolving? did the fish and/or apes find out that the new human species could procreate so they stopped evolving? when and who was the last evolved human? did we stop evolving after a male and female evolved?
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
what did we(humans) evolve from....fish?....apes?.....why did we stop evolving? did the fish and/or apes find out that the new human species could procreate so they stopped evolving? when and who was the last evolved human? did we stop evolving after a male and female evolved?
who said we stopped evolving? who said animals have stopped evolving? Evolution takes on many forms. Just because we are not evolving in the same manner as may have been popularly presented does not mean we are not still evolving, does it??? Just askin'?
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
I wonder if the science worshipers like box would get a doctors second opinion? If so, why? All doctors are trained in science, therefor all doctors diagnosis and treatment MUST all be equal and never questioned.
If two doctors have different diagnosis's, how does the science worshiper choose? How can one doctor be wrong and one be correct? Or could they both be wrong, and there is a third option. Oh the dilemma's you are faced with.
I'm sure in this case, box would take the word of science...but which scientist? I guess it's all faith at that point;D
SCIENCE??? WE DON'T NEED NO STINKIN SCIENCE!!!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
who said we stopped evolving? who said animals have stopped evolving? Evolution takes on many forms. Just because we are not evolving in the same manner as may have been popularly presented does not mean we are not still evolving, does it??? Just askin'?
I really don't know....i'm just askin too.
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Science is great, so long as political hacks don't manipulate it to push a political agenda. You use it to end all inquiry and debate, proclaiming one piece of EVIDENCE as FACT.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Do you want to come over and give a timeline on those prints 
Logged
