Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Littlefield Announces Candidacy
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Rotterdam Politics  ›  Littlefield Announces Candidacy Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 35 Guests

Littlefield Announces Candidacy  This thread currently has 9,272 views. |
10 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Recommend Thread
benny salami
June 30, 2009, 2:08pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
Quoted from 78
My campaign website is now online.  On the Issues page,  I present my positions on many important issues that confront Schenectady County residents. I offer my candid thoughts and views so that voters may assess the philosophy and ideology that will shape my words and guide my actions when elected to the County Legislature.  

My positions on other issues will be added at a later time.  I don't expect that all will agree with my stated positions.  However, voters will know where I stand and can make their decisions based on information that most candidates don't usually disclose.

http://www.bradlittlefield.org



What a refreshing difference comparing Brad's site with the other Dist 4 candidates running on their last name or phony promises.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 45 - 136
bumblethru
June 30, 2009, 3:33pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Great site Brad! Good luck!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 46 - 136
senders
June 30, 2009, 7:14pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Go Brad,,,,Go Brad....Go, Go, Go.......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 47 - 136
Salvatore
July 2, 2009, 11:30am Report to Moderator
Guest User
he will get crushed by Holly and Judy sorry
Logged
E-mail Reply: 48 - 136
benny salami
July 2, 2009, 12:06pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
While Holly is in Mexico and Judy is sitting home on her "laurels", Brad Littlefield is talking to voters and picking up major support. Keep underestimating him.

      My money's is on the underdog. People are getting tired of those that change parties like underwear and their idiotic promises. Unfortunately for Judy DAG she has a record-of doing nothing-saying nothing-except supporting additional County and sales taxes.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 49 - 136
MobileTerminal
July 2, 2009, 1:36pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Yes Mr Supervisor
Logged
E-mail Reply: 50 - 136
Smoking Bananas
July 15, 2009, 7:34am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,320
Reputation
42.86%
Reputation Score
+3 / -4
Time Online
11 days 5 hours 9 minutes
Mr. Littlefield sounds interesting, bu I fear he is misinformed. I read his web site. He wants to place residency restrictions on welfare residents. Nice idea, however, it is illegal. So if he is advocating that the breaking of laws, then perhaps he is not the right candidate for office.

I also believe he is a bit out of touch with reality on some other issues. More on that later


I love a good joke, that is why I come here.

Remember: B. slimey equals propaganda  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 51 - 136
Shadow
July 15, 2009, 7:53am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Why should the taxpayers have to pay for welfare to people who do not reside in the county and are coming here strictly for the lucrative benefits this county pays? Welfare should not be allowed to become a career job like many have enjoyed in the past, there needs to be time limits placed on how long people can collect or the burden on the people being taxed to pay for these benefits becomes too great.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 52 - 136
CICERO
July 15, 2009, 8:23am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Smoking Bananas
Mr. Littlefield sounds interesting, bu I fear he is misinformed. I read his web site. He wants to place residency restrictions on welfare residents. Nice idea, however, it is illegal. So if he is advocating that the breaking of laws, then perhaps he is not the right candidate for office.

I also believe he is a bit out of touch with reality on some other issues. More on that later



He's running for legislator, he would most likely propose a bill that would make it illegal.  The residency restrictions would be NEW legislation.  When you run for legislator on NEW ideas and a new platform, you obviously would be working to CHANGE the current county laws that make Schenectady County(City) such a crime ridden toilet.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 53 - 136
benny salami
July 15, 2009, 8:27am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
Brad Littlefield is rightfully stating that County DSS needs to start doing at home investigations and checking that all new welfare applicants actually live here. Not establishing a mailbox for check pick up from the Bronx.

     There is nothing "illegal" about that. Brad Littlefield is the only candidate in the County addressing the massive welfare fraud that costs County taxpayers millions of dollars. For someone to claim this is illegal speaks to their ignorance. In the next breath they are supporting Mary Cherry who's big issue is the Albany County dump? Try focusing on something that Schenectady County voters care about-not Albany County voters. This is all about the fact that Brad Littlefield turned in 5X the petitions needed to run and will be on the ballot.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 54 - 136
Brad Littlefield
July 15, 2009, 8:50am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
Quoted from Smoking Bananas:
Mr. Littlefield sounds interesting, bu I fear he is misinformed. I read his web site. He wants to place residency restrictions on welfare residents. Nice idea, however, it is illegal. So if he is advocating that the breaking of laws, then perhaps he is not the right candidate for office.


Folks, Smoking Bananas assertion re: residency requirements has basis in law.  I would, however, expect that any discussion re: how to reform the social services provided by the county and state to control the unsustainable spending would address the legality and practicality of any proposal and the genuine public need for such affected programs.  There is a County Attorney's office who would/should advise on any proposed legislation.

http://supreme.justia.com/constitution/amendment-14/96-right-to-travel.html

Bananas statement about my advocating breaking of laws, seemingly exhibits pollitically motivated partisanship.  I continue to welcome his/her input as I do from all residents of Schenectady County District 4.  

I have revised my web site content to remove the proposal for residency requirements.  Though I understand there to be such provisions for certain types of assistance (e.g., tuition assistance), length of residency cannot be a consideration for determining eligibilty for others.  The verification of residency, however, must be performed.

It is time for new ideas and a dialogue regarding how to turn this county around before it is at a point of no return.  
Logged
E-mail Reply: 55 - 136
Smoking Bananas
July 15, 2009, 9:25am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,320
Reputation
42.86%
Reputation Score
+3 / -4
Time Online
11 days 5 hours 9 minutes
There you go, you proved my point by removing the clause. Also, you seem a bit thin-skinned. To question you, it seems, is to suggest I am politically motivated, and then you ask for input from residents. You can;t have it both ways.

As for your other proposals, a majority of them are likely not, I repeat not, to be enacted. Therefore, you are just another politician empty promises.

Also, are you even a serious candidate? You do not even have a line. You have to primary for the seat, and it is 100 percent likely you will lose. So until you have a line, you have no political leg to stand on. Am I correct?


I love a good joke, that is why I come here.

Remember: B. slimey equals propaganda  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 56 - 136
bumblethru
July 15, 2009, 10:15am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Not being endorsed by a major political party should not diminish the fact that a person may or may not be a viable candidate for a position. This is the way the election system is set up.

It is beginning to make people wonder if political parties are just endorsing candidates who will go along with the status quo and that they do not support change. People are beginning to look at these independent candidates who are not beholden to any political party as viable candidates.


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 57 - 136
PuddyCat
July 15, 2009, 10:32am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Where are they looking at these candidates BumbleButt?  Not in Rotterdam.  The Independent Party endorsed based on cronyism and who "should" win.  What the hell are talking about?

Sounds like wishful thinkin there John Boy!
Logged
E-mail Reply: 58 - 136
Felipe
July 15, 2009, 11:28am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Puddycat ~ see there you go again, you actually made sense.  Sometimes you sound a little bit too much like our friend Sal, then other times you actaully make good points.

Back to Brad.  Puddycat is absolutely correct ~ The IND PARTY endorses whoever they think will win.  You can't blame them, it actually keeps them relevant.

As for Smoking Crack, oops, I mean Smoking Bananas ~ I'll be interested to watch your postings as the campaign goes on.

Where are my prognosticators?  Who gives any of the Repubs or Conserv a shot against Holly and Judy?
Logged
E-mail Reply: 59 - 136
10 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread