Actually, I have never spoken to either of Tedesco's 2 employees- Sherman or Buchanan, but it sems that you are doing a lot of that lately. I can't understand why Tedesco's people are working so hard with a gadfly who fought so hard for nothing but KRATZ in Rotterdam the last decade.... (Paolino and Cooke). Hmmm something smells fishy.
As I told you in our last Board meeting papaChairman, it was Bill Sherman who recorded you...and I heard the message myself. And you DID speak to Buchanan, once, and he never called you back again. That's when you proceeded to harass every Republican in your phonebook demanding that he call you. You even went as far as to threaten an endorsed Republican's authorization if her Chairman didn't call you back...a threat on which you followed through when you ditched Carol Carpenter at the authorization line. You now claim, under oath no less, that she simply didn't give you her acceptance certificate - which I find hard to believe since she actively sought the endorsement, received it, collected her petition signatures, etc. Maybe we should ask her to verify your claim.
I know what I heard with my own ears, papaLiar. And as I also told you at our last Board meeting, Sherman called inquiring about petitions for Farley - only to find out that his petitions were distributed to none of our Committee Members. That's when he asked WHAT WAS GOING ON WITH OUR CHAIRMAN. And that is when he played your message. To this day I can't believe it...and wouldn't if I hadn't heard it myself. The only reason you and the Kratz simply won't accept the fact that we are able to do this ourselves is because neither you, nor your predecessors, have ever had to do it yourselves. The Kratz who own you do your work for you...just as they think for you, and make all of your decisions for you. You exist on that Committee only as a puppet to Hamilton, who is in turn their slave. On Paolino and Cooke: John and Bill are conservative Democrats. They are not liberal Demokratz like your friends Savage, Quail, Gardner, et al. They are also far more competent than either Joe Signore or Steve Tommasone. And I never heard a word of dissent from you on Cooke when we endorsed him.
are you outing this here fine gentleman? If he is a public servnt then he is entitled to being anonymous indeed. I dont think he is a Rotterdam officer unless he is new on the force but he may be a city policeman so I would like to ask you Gadfly to respect that he puts the life on the line and not use his name. Though I am getting a little tired of my friends the policemen bashing Angelo and will make my decision based on that, I still respect the officers and think they have a right to remain anonymous in the political realm to protect them from the thugs they put in jail {protecting us} who might want to hurt them over here. They shouldn't be required to have the names and addresses on the files since I believe the police should be able to have privacy since it is indeed life or death for them and the kids and wives. On a futher note over here I want to know whicxh repubs are doing what to hurt the police and which demos are defending these here men. I dont want to hear despursions about Ang eiether Papa so give me truths please, indeed.
are you outing this here fine gentleman? If he is a public servnt then he is entitled to being anonymous indeed. I dont think he is a Rotterdam officer unless he is new on the force but he may be a city policeman so I would like to ask you Gadfly to respect that he puts the life on the line and not use his name. Though I am getting a little tired of my friends the policemen bashing Angelo and will make my decision based on that, I still respect the officers and think they have a right to remain anonymous in the political realm to protect them from the thugs they put in jail {protecting us} who might want to hurt them over here. They shouldn't be required to have the names and addresses on the files since I believe the police should be able to have privacy since it is indeed life or death for them and the kids and wives. On a futher note over here I want to know whicxh repubs are doing what to hurt the police and which demos are defending these here men. I dont want to hear despursions about Ang eiether Papa so give me truths please, indeed.
First and foremost, I absolutely respect our men in blue. REALLY!! I know I couldn't and wouldn't want the job!
Second Sal, I have to disagree with you about the police needing to be anonymous in the political arena. They clearly were not anonymous when they tried and succeeded taking over the local conservative party. In fact they were very vocal about it and brought attention to themselves.
So although I highly respect their job, they did not fair well in the political arena. Perhaps we should not refer to them as police officers any longer. They are just a group that took over the conservative party for their own motives. And that shouldn't (but does) seem to happen in all political parties these days.
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
are you outing this here fine gentleman? If he is a public servnt then he is entitled to being anonymous indeed. I dont think he is a Rotterdam officer unless he is new on the force but he may be a city policeman so I would like to ask you Gadfly to respect that he puts the life on the line and not use his name. Though I am getting a little tired of my friends the policemen bashing Angelo and will make my decision based on that, I still respect the officers and think they have a right to remain anonymous in the political realm to protect them from the thugs they put in jail {protecting us} who might want to hurt them over here. They shouldn't be required to have the names and addresses on the files since I believe the police should be able to have privacy since it is indeed life or death for them and the kids and wives. On a futher note over here I want to know whicxh repubs are doing what to hurt the police and which demos are defending these here men. I dont want to hear despursions about Ang eiether Papa so give me truths please, indeed.
This fine gentleman, Sal? You obviously don't even know who he is. So just you know, Randy is not a police officer. And no one is doing anything to hurt the police.
On Paolino and Cooke: John and Bill are conservative Democrats. They are not liberal Demokratz like your friends Savage, Quail, Gardner, et al. They are also far more competent than either Joe Signore or Steve Tommasone. And I never heard a word of dissent from you on Cooke when we endorsed him.
Bill Cooke was clearly NOT the candidate the conservs should have endorsed. And Bill Cooke would have NOT been the best choice for Rotterdam's supervisor position. Gadfly, a candidate should not be chosen for their fiscal restraint solely. The WHOLE candidate and what they can bring to the table is essential. Which Cooke failed miserably in.
Bill Cooke was and is just another liberal, union supporter dem, plain and simple. There were many many people who questioned that endorsement in the last election, just like many many people questioned the rep's endorsement of dem, Jack Denny!!! I obviously didn't work in either case. Lesson learned, I hope!
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
I didnt agree with the Cooke endorsement or the Denny endorsement. The gadfly speaks out of both sides of her mouth. In one breath she is criticizing the endorsement of Liberal KRATZ and any assistance they give the conservatives and at the same time she seeks assistance from republicans and kicks, screams, and carries on to support liberal candidates for the last decade.
It is not okay for democrats to carry petitions and get signatures, but it is okay for her to seek the assistance or receive the assistance of members of other political parties in hiring an attorney, etc etc... It is okay for her to support liberal, union backing officials, but not okay for the conservatives to back a former police chief.
I didnt agree with the Cooke endorsement or the Denny endorsement. The gadfly speaks out of both sides of her mouth. In one breath she is criticizing the endorsement of Liberal KRATZ and any assistance they give the conservatives and at the same time she seeks assistance from republicans and kicks, screams, and carries on to support liberal candidates for the last decade.
It is not okay for democrats to carry petitions and get signatures, but it is okay for her to seek the assistance or receive the assistance of members of other political parties in hiring an attorney, etc etc... It is okay for her to support liberal, union backing officials, but not okay for the conservatives to back a former police chief.
Cant have it both ways gadfly
I have sought no assistance from any members of any party outside of the Conservative Party, and your baseless, obsessive insistance that we have does not make it so... nor does the fact that our attorney happens to be a Republican. As I have stated, we chose Spargo for his expertise, not his political affiliation. And have you already forgotten that we didn't even endorse Denny? And if you didn't agree with the Cooke endorsement, why didn't you vote against it? Why didn't ANYONE vote against it? And you certainly didn't mention it in all of our discussions prior to our endorsements. You in fact stated your admiration for Bill Cooke. Your statements above make it obvious that not only are you a liar, but you are also incapable of discerning between liberal Demokratz and conservative Democrats. And by the way, you conveniently forgot to mention that as you know full well, Bill Cooke's union has no connection to the position he was seeking - unlike your preferred candidates. You are the only one talking out of both sides of your mouth, papaDesperate.
Logged
