if it's not in a constant state of flux, why does science keep changing their findings? I remember when an ice age was inevitable and now it's global warming. I remember when cholesterol from eggs was going to cause heart disease, now there is "good cholesterol" and "bad cholesterol" and eggs are good for you again. I remember when butter was considered bad for you, and everybody began using margarine. Now margarine has trans fats which is now allegedly worse than saturated fats in butter. I remember pluto was the ninth planet in the solar system, now it's not a planet. I remember when x and y chromosomes determined the gender of a human being, now gender is a decision.
I said everything isnt in a state of flux. Somethings appear to change over time. 50 years ago scientist were still arguing weather a photon has mass. Nothing really changed though. Light has always had weight.
Some other things can change over time too .Like if your uncle has t!ts would he be your aunt ?
No, because your comprehension fails again. It was not a question to myself, it was response to your post...read it again! DUH!!!!
Yeah...It was a response to my question about Nixon. So what am I supposed to comprehend it to mean? Since Hernandez isn't a convicted murderer and nixon wasn't impeached, they have committed no crime? Or is it supposed to mean that even though they are not convicted of a crime, they still committed a crime?
Yeah...It was a response to my question about Nixon. So what am I supposed to comprehend it to mean? Since Hernandez isn't a convicted murderer and nixon wasn't impeached, they have committed no crime? Or is it supposed to mean that even though they are not convicted of a crime, they still committed a crime?
It simply means USE YOUR PHUCKING BRAIN!!!!!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
More "truth" from joey. He's been reduced to name calling.
More denial from Sissy, he back to playing silly Sissy games! Can't participate on a level of honest discussion, so reverts to silly games. PS - Douche Nozzle was your term of endearment....just repeating it back to you!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
More denial from Sissy, he back to playing silly Sissy games! Can't participate on a level of honest discussion, so reverts to silly games. PS - Douche Nozzle was your term of endearment....just repeating it back to you!
No games, no denials, just trying to get your secrets on determining truth. Once again, no answer. Just screaming CONSPIRACY when soneone else has a different opinion of "truth" than you have. It's an honest discussion, you start calling it a game when asked specific questions on how you determine truth, because you refuse to answer.
Some day hopefully Joey will reveal his secrets on finding absolute truth. Until then, the rest of us who are skeptical about what is the consensus truth will be considered conspiracy theorists. While Joey can travel through life with the luxury of knowing the absolute truths of the world around him.
truth /tro͞oTH/ noun noun: truth the quality or state of being true. "he had to accept the truth of her accusation" synonyms: veracity, truthfulness, verity, sincerity, candor, honesty; More accuracy, correctness, validity, factuality, authenticity "he doubted the truth of her statement" antonyms: dishonesty, falseness •that which is true or in accordance with fact or reality. noun: the truth "tell me the truth" synonyms: what actually happened, the case, so; More the gospel (truth), the honest truth "it's the truth, I swear" •fact(s), reality, real life, actuality "truth is stranger than fiction" antonyms: lies, fiction •a fact or belief that is accepted as true. plural noun: truths "the emergence of scientific truths" synonyms: fact, verity, certainty, certitude; More law, principle "scientific truths" antonyms: lie, falsehood
Quoted Text
Truth in the law means objective, reliable facts that may be admitted as evidence in a trial. The testimony of witnesses is by nature inherently subjective. Testimony alone is an unreliable path to truth.
As for how "I" determine truth, I've explained it in multiple ways...basically applying the ability to comprehend facts and make intelligent decisions. It's called using your brain. Oh and truth to one person does not mean it is truth to everyone either (especially people like you that just want to argue, regardless of what they believe is the truth.) You just can't grasp it and want to make it an issue for your Sissy games. I'M DONE!!! Original topic is Trump impeachment and that is what I'll focus on rather than your redirects.
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Tick tock, tick tock...10 month investigation into Trump colluding with Russian Government, no charges of a crime (the crime would be treason) and there is a so-call (tick tock tick tock)count down until impeachment. Where is the evidence of a crime?
Tick tock, tick tock...10 month investigation into Trump colluding with Russian Government, no charges of a crime (the crime would be treason) and there is a so-call (tick tock tick tock)count down until impeachment. Where is the evidence of a crime?
Ongoing investigation, so why would there be charges now or evidence released to the public. Collusion may not be determined as a crime...could be an ethical breach. Doubtful there will be criminal charges.
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Good question...why would politicians and the media suggest impeachment without evidence of a crime?
Once again you miss words....the discussions surround actions that "might be" impeachable offenses. Most critical of the bunch is obstruction of justice...i.e. Trump trying to impede the investigation. If proven, it might not be a criminal act, but "could" be an impeachable offense.
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!