SENATE PANEL TO VOTE ON TRUMP'S SUPREME COURT NOMINEE BY MARY CLARE JALONICK ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A Senate panel is opening a weeklong partisan showdown over President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee with Democrats steadily amassing the votes to block Neil Gorsuch and force Republicans to unilaterally change long-standing rules to confirm him.
The Republican-led Judiciary Committee meets Monday and is expected to back Gorsuch and send his nomination to the full Senate, most likely on a near-party line vote. Intent on getting Trump's pick on the high court, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is likely to change Senate rules so that Gorsuch can be confirmed with a simple majority in the 100-seat chamber, instead of the 60-voter threshold.
"Neil Gorsuch will be confirmed this week," McConnell said on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, adding, "how that happens really depends on our Democratic friends. How many of them are willing to oppose cloture on a partisan basis to kill a Supreme Court nominee."
So far, 36 Democrats and one independent have announced they will vote to block the nomination on a procedural cloture vote - a parliamentary step to advance a legislative issue - and oppose the choice. Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., who faces a tough re-election in a state Trump won handily, announced his opposition on Sunday.
"With Judge Gorsuch on the bench, I am deeply concerned that dark money will continue to drown out the voices and votes of citizens, the Court will stand between women and their doctors, and the government will reach into the private lives of law-abiding Americans. These are not Montana values, which is why I cannot support this nomination," Tester said in a statement.
Another Democrat in a Republican-dominated state who is up for re-election next year, Sen. Joe Donnelly of Indiana, announced he would support the president's nominee. Donnelly called Gorsuch, 49, a federal appeals court judge based in Denver, "a qualified jurist who will base his decisions on his understanding of the law and is well-respected among his peers."
Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, have vowed to block the nominee, infuriating Republicans, who argue the action is exceedingly rare for Supreme Court choices.
Schumer said Sunday he didn't expect Gorsuch to receive the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster threat.
Although such a change in Senate rules might seem procedural or obscure, it is known on Capitol Hill as the "nuclear option" because it would amount to a dramatic departure from Senate norms of bipartisanship and collegiality.
It would not be unprecedented. In 2013, Democrats were in the majority and upset about appellate court nominees getting blocked. They pushed through a rules change lowering the vote threshold on all nominees except for the Supreme Court - from 60 votes to a simple majority.
In addition to Gorsuch, the Judiciary committee will be considering two other nominations - Rod Rosenstein to be deputy attorney general and Rachel Brand to be associate attorney general. If confirmed, they will be the No. 2 and No. 3 officials at the Justice Department under Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
I watched his questioning by Congress and was somewhat disappointed with his attitude and what appeared to be vague answers. He also had a smirk most of the time with a little bit of a cocky phony attitude. I almost felt like he was giving answers that he knew they wanted and may not have been his real feelings. I was originally thinking he would be a good choice, but his record leans toward businesses instead of people, and he had a few decisions that are questionable and even critiqued by his equals as being questionable.
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!