Yup. more Sissy WAH-WAH BS because HE LIES!!!! Trying desperately to deflect away from HIS LIES!!!! Wants to put words in peoples mouths that they never said. Once again goes totally away from his original false claim trying to justify his LIES!!!! SISSY persists....only an idiot persists in his error!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Yup. more Sissy WAH-WAH BS because HE LIES!!!! Trying desperately to deflect away from HIS LIES!!!! Wants to put words in peoples mouths that they never said. Once again goes totally away from his original false claim trying to justify his LIES!!!! SISSY persists....only an idiot persists in his error!
So your argument is that if it was the Secret Service instead of Lewendowski that grabbed the woman and left bruises, it would have been justifiable?
I agree, it's not a race or gender issue. It's a question of who is authorized to initiate contact to prevent unsolicited contact with a candidate?
Joey could simply answer this question and clarified his statement by replying:
'No, the Secret Service does not have the authority to grab the reporter's arm as a way to stop her from approaching Trump. ANYBODY that made physical contact with the reporter's arm and left bruises would be considered an assault and subject to being charged with a crime'. OR 'Yes, the Secret Service has the authority to grab the reporter's arm as a way to stop her from approaching Trump. The Secret Service is authorized to make that decision and Trump's campaign manager does not have the authorization to make that decision.'
Joey could simply answer this question and clarified his statement by replying:
'No, the Secret Service does not have the authority to grab the reporter's arm as a way to stop her from approaching Trump. ANYBODY that made physical contact with the reporter's arm and left bruises would be considered an assault and subject to being charged with a crime'. OR 'Yes, the Secret Service has the authority to grab the reporter's arm as a way to stop her from approaching Trump. The Secret Service is authorized to make that decision and Trump's campaign manager does not have the authorization to make that decision.'
Why would I answer a questions about a fabricated lie that you made up trying to claim I said something I didn't? Why don't you answer the question: WHY DID YOU MAKE UP A STATEMENT CLAIMING I MADE IT WHEN I DIDN'T? How about it numbnuts...why did you fabricate a lie and try to make it seem like I said something I didn't? Why don't YOU answer that? You've spun it every which way you can away from what you did, trying to box me in on something to avoid owning your lie and saying it was a lie! Sissy the Liar!! Can't stand it when he's exposed!!!!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Trump flips again and his campaign manager makes stupid excuses to cover it up again.
Quoted Text
Donald Trump: Don't change abortion laws
Last Updated Apr 1, 2016 9:27 PM EDT
Update:Trump campaign communications manager Hope Hicks released a statement to CBS News late Friday clarifying the candidate's comments.
"Mr. Trump gave an accurate account of the law as it is today and made clear it must stay that way now --until he is President," Hicks said. "Then he will change the law through his judicial appointments and allow the states to protect the unborn. There is nothing new or different here."
Donald Trump said Friday that he believes the laws regulating abortion should stay as they are, but he doesn't disagree with the proposition that abortion is murder.
The GOP front-runner lit a fresh controversy this week with his shifting responses to a question on abortion policy. He said during an MSNBC town hall on Tuesday that he'd like to see the practice banned, and that women who undergo it should face "some form of punishment." But he quickly backtracked, explaining in a statement that while he believes it should be banned, the punishment should be levied on abortion providers, not the women seeking abortions.
Trump sought to clarify his position during an interview on Friday with "Face the Nation" moderator John Dickerson. The interview will air, in part, on Sunday's broadcast.
Play Video
Full Interview: Donald Trump, March 6
"A question was asked to me. And it was asked in a very hypothetical. And it was said, 'Illegal, illegal,'" Trump explained. "I've been told by some people that was an older line answer and that was an answer that was given on a, you know, basis of an older line from years ago on a very conservative basis."
Asked how he'd like to change the law to further restrict access to abortions, Trump replied, "The laws are set now on abortion and that's the way they're going to remain until they're changed."
"I would've preferred states' rights," he added. "I think it would've been better if it were up to the states. But right now, the laws are set....At this moment, the laws are set. And I think we have to leave it that way."
"Do you think abortion is murder?" Dickerson asked.
"I have my opinions on it, but I'd rather not comment on it," Trump replied.
"You said you were very pro-life," Dickerson followed up. "Pro-life means that...abortion is murder."
"I mean, I do have my opinions on it. I just don't think it's an appropriate forum," said Trump.
"But you don't disagree with that proposition, that it's murder?" Dickerson asked.
"No, I don't disagree with it," Trump eventually replied.
Play Video
Dickerson on Trump aide arrest, RNC pledge backdown
The back-and-forth over abortion wasn't the only political controversy involving Trump this week. He also stood by his campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, who's been charged with battery after allegedly grabbing a reporter's arm during a public event last month. And he suggested on Tuesday that he no longer feels bound by his pledge to support the eventual GOP nominee, complaining that the party has treated him "very unfairly."
Despite a chorus of critics assailing both moves, Trump told "Face the Nation" it hasn't been the worst week of his campaign.
"I think I've had many bad weeks and I've had many good weeks. I don't see this as the worst week in my campaign," he said. "But certainly, I've had some weeks, and you've been reporting on them, where that was the end. And then the next week, you see poll numbers where they went up and everybody's shocked."
"So yeah, people want to stop me because I'm leading by a lot," he added.
For more of the interview with Trump, tune into "Face the Nation" on Sunday. Check your local listings for airtimes.
A transcript of the interview clip can be seen below:
John Dickerson interviews Donald Trump: April 1, 2016
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Why would I answer a questions about a fabricated lie that you made up trying to claim I said something I didn't? Why don't you answer the question: WHY DID YOU MAKE UP A STATEMENT CLAIMING I MADE IT WHEN I DIDN'T? How about it numbnuts...why did you fabricate a lie and try to make it seem like I said something I didn't? Why don't YOU answer that? You've spun it every which way you can away from what you did, trying to box me in on something to avoid owning your lie and saying it was a lie! Sissy the Liar!! Can't stand it when he's exposed!!!!
I didn't make up a statement. I ask a question based on your post. Do you know the difference between a statement and a question? Do you know the function of question mark? I know you are incapable of answering a question about one of your posts. Maybe you think a questioning your posts are statements. I thought you may have learned on how to have a dialog. Obviously not.
I'll try one more time with my question based on your posts(not a statement):
Quoted Text
So your argument is that if it was the Secret Service instead of Lewendowski that grabbed the woman and left bruises, it would have been justifiable?
I didn't make up a statement. I ask a question based on your post. Do you know the difference between a statement and a question? Do you know the function of question mark? I know you are incapable of answering a question about one of your posts. Maybe you think a questioning your posts are statements. I thought you may have learned on how to have a dialog. Obviously not.
I'll try one more time with my question based on your posts(not a statement):
Can't help you because it wasn't my argument and wasn't my position as you try to lie it was! Not going to play your game and talk about something I didn't say and YOU FABRICATED as being mine. Not going to play your stupid game...got it? Fabricated lies and stupid games...welcome to Sissy's world!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Can't help you because it wasn't my argument and wasn't my position as you try to lie it was! Not going to play your game and talk about something I didn't say and YOU FABRICATED as being mine. Not going to play your stupid game...got it? Fabricated lies and stupid games...welcome to Sissy's world!
So are there any questions that can be asked to clarify your position on this statement? Or do you run from all questions regardless how "fair" you think they are?
BINGO! So security didn't see reporter as a threat and do anything, so why did campaign manager jump in...not his job and he should have never been involved. Security was standing right there next to Trump and felt there was no issue!
Could the campaign manager have "jumped in" is if security viewed the reporter as a threat?
If it was the campaign manager's "job" to protect Trump from unsolicited reporters, would his actions have been ok?
Was there was anybody at the event that would be authorized to have physically stopped the reporter from making unsolicited contact with Trump?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
So are there any questions that can be asked to clarify your position on this statement? Or do you run from all questions regardless how "fair" you think they are?
My "position" was quite clear in my original statement before you jumped in and fabricated lies to serve some stupid game you want to play! Like I said, reading comprehension is not a strong point for you...obviously! Your game...play with yourself!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Sarah Palin Didn't Do Very Well Stumping For Donald Trump In Wisconsin Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) campaigned on behalf of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in Wisconsin on Friday, and it went badly.
Palin's speech at a Republican gathering in Milwaukee fell flat and earned little applause from about 750 attendees, according to the Journal Times. The Washington Post's Philip Rucker reported that Palin got some laughs when she said, "Trump talks rationally."
The crowd was largely supportive of Trump's rival Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who recently got the endorsement of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) and leads the businessman in state polls ahead of Tuesday's primary . Radio host Vicki McKenna also slammed Trump during the event for criticizing Walker.
Wisconsin, where 42 delegates are up for grabs, could be a critical state in denying the reality TV personality the necessary delegates to win the Republican nomination. " Philip Rucker @PhilipRucker
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Logged
