Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
I think we need a DONALD TRUMP thread!!
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  I think we need a DONALD TRUMP thread!! Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 150 Guests

I think we need a DONALD TRUMP thread!!  This thread currently has 70,162 views. |
66 Pages « ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ... » Recommend Thread
CICERO
April 1, 2016, 2:51pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

Yes BINGO that Secret Service saw no issue, so campaign manager should have left well enough alone.
She wasn't grabbing him, she was asking a question when question period was over and he didn't like it.
He was trying to prevent her from getting to Trump and asking questions, and grabbed her hard enough
to leave marks on her arm...period, over and out!
Forget the gender card issue, I don't play gender, race cards...that's media bait. Everyone loves what-ifs...,
what-ifs are hypothetical conjecture and cannot honestly represent facts.


So your argument is that if it was the Secret Service instead of Lewendowski that grabbed the woman and left bruises, it would have been justifiable?

I agree, it's not a race or gender issue.  It's a question of who is authorized to initiate contact to prevent unsolicited contact with a candidate.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 555 - 980
leggs9966
April 1, 2016, 2:58pm Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
200
Time Online
104 days 22 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

Yes BINGO that Secret Service saw no issue, so campaign manager should have left well enough alone.
She wasn't grabbing him, she was asking a question when question period was over and he didn't like it.
He was trying to prevent her from getting to Trump and asking questions, and grabbed her hard enough
to leave marks on her arm...period, over and out!
Forget the gender card issue, I don't play gender, race cards...that's media bait. Everyone loves what-ifs...,
what-ifs are hypothetical conjecture and cannot honestly represent facts.

  Ya, I guess what ifs and what if Hillary knocked out a male reporter cold for stepping out of the question mode. That would be cool to catch on video. Mud wrestling, two women. Race, I'm not sure we will ever see a oriental President. Give me a beer, that'ill make it better! Women only scratch and claw .. I thought she grabbed at Trumps arm. And I thought her original statement was that she was pulled to the ground before the video surfaced. Facts, Opinions and Lies. Maybe your right. But then again, You might be mistaken..
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 556 - 980
joebxr
April 1, 2016, 3:00pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
So your argument is that if it was the Secret Service instead of Lewendowski that grabbed the woman and left bruises, it would have been justifiable?

WOW, really Sissy...trying to put words into peoples mouths again or still suffering from reading comprehension!
Please show where I said what you are fabricating that I said! Nice try NUMBNUTS!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 557 - 980
joebxr
April 1, 2016, 3:04pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from leggs9966

  Ya, I guess what ifs and what if Hillary knocked out a male reporter cold for stepping out of the question mode. That would be cool to catch on video. Mud wrestling, two women. Race, I'm not sure we will ever see a oriental President. Give me a beer, that'ill make it better! Women only scratch and claw .. I thought she grabbed at Trumps arm. And I thought her original statement was that she was pulled to the ground before the video surfaced. Facts, Opinions and Lies. Maybe your right. But then again, You might be mistaken..


She may have "felt" like she was going to the ground, but I don't believe she said she was pulled to the ground.
Watch the video and look to see where she ever touches Trump. She was trying to ask questions and
take notes...look at her hands.  Even Trump has said first SHE WAS GRABBING ME then said SHE WAS TRYING TO GRAB ME and SHE ALMOST GRABBED ME...don't see that
on the video!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 558 - 980
CICERO
April 1, 2016, 4:07pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

WOW, really Sissy...trying to put words into peoples mouths again or still suffering from reading comprehension!
Please show where I said what you are fabricating that I said! Nice try NUMBNUTS!


Quoted from joebxr

Yes BINGO that Secret Service saw no issue, so campaign manager should have left well enough alone.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 559 - 980
joebxr
April 1, 2016, 4:10pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
STILL WAITING IDIOT...you just proved I never said what you have fabricated!!
What a douche nozzle you are!
Quoted from CICERO
So your argument is that if it was the Secret Service instead of Lewendowski that grabbed the woman and left bruises, it would have been justifiable?




JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 560 - 980
CICERO
April 1, 2016, 4:28pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr
STILL WAITING IDIOT...you just proved I never said what you have fabricated!!
What a douche nozzle you are!





Quoted from joebxr


BINGO! So security didn't see reporter as a threat and do anything, so why did campaign manager jump in...not his job and he should have never been involved.
Security was standing right there next to Trump and felt there was no issue!


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 561 - 980
joebxr
April 1, 2016, 4:40pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO




BWAHAHAHAHA...Sissy is trying oh so hard to prove his LYING FABRICATED WORDS and
FAILING MISERABLY!!!!! Keep trying Sissy...you will grow old trying to prove your LIE!
NOTHING you have posted supports the lie that you try to make my words...and they don't. THEY SHOW I DIDN'T
SAY THE FABRICATING WORDS YOU CREATED you IDIOT!!!

Reminder SISSY, here are your lies and are not even close to what I said, DOUCHE NOZZLE!
Quoted from CICERO
So your argument is that if it was the Secret Service instead of Lewendowski that grabbed the woman and left bruises, it would have been justifiable?



JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 562 - 980
CICERO
April 1, 2016, 5:05pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Why does it matter if security seen the reporter as a threat?  Why did you say it wasn't the campaign manager's JOB?  
Would it have been ok for the campaign manager to react the way he did if it was his job?  

Of course I do not expect you to answer any of these questions.
Quoted from joebxr


BINGO! So security didn't see reporter as a threat and do anything, so why did campaign manager jump in...not his job and he should have never been involved.
Security was standing right there next to Trump and felt there was no issue!


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 563 - 980
joebxr
April 1, 2016, 5:06pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted Text
Trump is now the least popular American politician in three decades
WASHINGTON — For months, as Donald Trump lurched from controversy to controversy, commentators marveled that his voters remained loyal: Trump is impervious to political attack, some said.

Not so. Trump wasn't immune; analysts were just failing to look at the whole board.

Controversy over Trump has failed to dent his standing with his core supporters in the Republican primaries, but his image among the rest of the electorate has plunged.

The share of Americans with an unfavorable view of Trump is extraordinary: 68 percent in the most recent Bloomberg poll, 67 percent in the CNN/ORC survey, 67 percent in the ABC/Washington Post poll, 65 percent from Gallup. The 57 percent unfavorable rating he received in the most recent CBS/New York Times survey looks mild by comparison.

Over the past three decades, pollsters have asked the public how it feels about scores of political figures — presidents, would-be presidents, governors, senators, Cabinet officials and others. Not one has been so widely unpopular as Trump is currently.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney briefly hit a 60 percent unfavorable rating during the closing years of the George W. Bush administration. Newt Gingrich's unpopularity exceeded 60 percent briefly during his unsuccessful run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012. George H.W. Bush's unfavorable level also hit 60 percent when he went down to defeat in his re-election effort in 1992. None of them hit Trump's level.

More than half of Americans had a negative view of Trump even before his presidential campaign began. Two factors account for how much worse his image has gotten.

He is extremely unpopular among Democrats, with more than 8 in 10 viewing him negatively. But he is also unpopular among many Republican women.

Republican men tend to view Trump favorably, with 61 percent having a positive image of him and 36 percent negative, according to the latest Gallup polling. But among Republican women, the verdict is almost even — 49 percent positive, 46 percent negative, Gallup found.

Overall, that leads to a very large gender gap in perceptions of Trump. Among all women, 70 percent have a negative view of him, while among men, 58 percent do. Having a positive view are 23 percent of women and 36 percent of men, Gallup found.

If Trump wins the GOP nomination, a key question will be whether he can do anything to change those impressions. Usually, however, political candidates' images get worse, not better, during a campaign.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/.....r-BBrer0j?li=BBnb7Kz


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 564 - 980
joebxr
April 1, 2016, 5:09pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
Why does it matter if security seen the reporter as a threat?  Why did you say it wasn't the campaign manager's JOB?  
Would it have been ok for the campaign manager to react the way he did if it was his job?  

Of course I do not expect you to answer any of these questions.

Why do you make up lies and then ask questions to deflect what you said.
How about clarifying that you fabricated the lie and they're not my words, they're yours and wrong!
How about it liar?
Of course I don't expect you to admit your lies, you never do!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 565 - 980
CICERO
April 1, 2016, 5:38pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

Why do you make up lies and then ask questions to deflect what you said.!


I ask questions because you run from your own words.  You clearly said that Trump's campaign manager had no authority to do what he did because security didn't see a threat, it wasn't his job, and he should have never been involved.

I'm not deflecting, just redirecting you to your own words and asking to explain what you mean.  If you read your words, you clearly emphasized security response, not being his job, and he should not have been involved.  

All I'm asking is, if Trump's campaign manager was security detail instead of the campaign manager, would it be authorized for him to pull away an unsolicited reporter from approaching Trump?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 566 - 980
joebxr
April 1, 2016, 7:15pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


I ask questions because you run from your own words.  You clearly said that Trump's campaign manager had no authority to do what he did because security didn't see a threat, it wasn't his job, and he should have never been involved.

I'm not deflecting, just redirecting you to your own words and asking to explain what you mean.  If you read your words, you clearly emphasized security response, not being his job, and he should not have been involved.  

All I'm asking is, if Trump's campaign manager was security detail instead of the campaign manager, would it be authorized for him to pull away an unsolicited reporter from approaching Trump?


Once again Sissy, you are trying your best to move far away from your lie by creating more lies and making up words that were not said.
I remind you, you said:
Quoted from CICERO
So your argument is that if it was the Secret Service instead of Lewendowski that grabbed the woman and left bruises, it would have been justifiable?

I never said if Secret Service had grabbed her it would have been justifiable!
I did not state it, did not insinuate it, did not post it, did not claim it as my argument, did not say it was
my position.......now, how about you prove that I did, because so far you have failed miserably and know
you can't prove it because you made it up!
That's what this whole diatribe was about, but you want to deflect away from it because once again SISSY LIES!

JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO, but he thinks it does!!!!!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 567 - 980
CICERO
April 1, 2016, 8:03pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr


Once again Sissy, you are trying your best to move far away from your lie by creating more lies and making up words that were not said.
I remind you, you said:

I never said if Secret Service had grabbed her it would have been justifiable!
I did not state it, did not insinuate it, did not post it, did not claim it as my argument, did not say it was
my position.......now, how about you prove that I did, because so far you have failed miserably and know
you can't prove it because you made it up!
That's what this whole diatribe was about, but you want to deflect away from it because once again SISSY LIES!

JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO, but he thinks it does!!!!!


I've provided my proof multiple times by quoting your own words. I'll let them stand alone.   And you still never explained why Trump's security detail's choice not to act on preventing the reporter approaching Trump means that Trump's campaign manager shouldn't have acted.  You haven't clarified what one has to do with the other.  What does Trump's security inaction have to do with his campaign managers action?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 568 - 980
joebxr
April 2, 2016, 2:44am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


I've provided my proof multiple times by quoting your own words. I'll let them stand alone.   And you still never explained why Trump's security detail's choice not to act on preventing the reporter approaching Trump means that Trump's campaign manager shouldn't have acted.  You haven't clarified what one has to do with the other.  What does Trump's security inaction have to do with his campaign managers action?

Just like Trump, you shy away from your statement and lie.
I've shown you lied and I never used those words, so you distract in another direction.
Typical Sissy BS and jackass games. What a douche-nozzle!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 569 - 980
66 Pages « ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ... » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  I think we need a DONALD TRUMP thread!!

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread