Exactly what I expected you to say, now why would you disarm the real 1st people who have to deal with the criminal. As I posted before cops show up after a crime has been committed 99% of the time, that means they're not the 1st responders they are the 2nd responders to the criminals. It makes more sense for the real 1st responder (the victim) to be the one more heavily armed to deal with the situation.
Who were the 1st responders in the bank at the North Hollywood Shootout??? Not your and your redneck brigade... Not some Faux Rambo GunHugger... Not the Anti-Govt crazies... The first responders were the police, and they got their @ss kicked because of GunHuggers like you who want assault weapons to be available.
Can you picture your bank teller with a bandolier of ammo across her chest, a K-Bar in her teeth, a Glock at her side and a locked and loaded assault weapon at her keyboard???
Yea... I bet you can!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Who were the 1st responders in the bank at the North Hollywood Shootout???
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
You're going to use one of the most EXTREME events ever to justify your argument?
Let's see...What's a person going to do with a pistol (I don't care what caliber) against two guys with a plan, dressed in full body ballistic armor and carrying fully automatic rifles?
Oh right...NOTHING.
"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'
You're going to use one of the most EXTREME events ever to justify your argument?
Let's see...What's a person going to do with a pistol (I don't care what caliber) against two guys with a plan, dressed in full body ballistic armor and carrying fully automatic rifles?
Oh right...NOTHING.
Correct. NOTHING! So how did it all turn out when both the Criminals were armed with automatic weapons, high capacity magazines and body armor... And the police (at least initially) had none?
Both robbers were killed, No civilians were killed... No police were killed... eleven police officers and seven civilians were injured.
We ALL owe a debt of gratitude to those policemen who were injured in this attack. (Well not all of us... Henry was cheering for the criminals, not the cops.)
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Fourteen months after its passage, 63 percent of registered New York state voters say they support the SAFE Act, compared to just 32 percent who oppose it, according to a Siena College poll released March 24, 2014.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Funny I never got polled as a registered voter If this was such a success Cuomo would have been on the news telling NYers how many people registered under it, although we will never hear it because it was a complete failure. Most people say only 10% registered and I think that is being very generous
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Most people say only 10% registered and I think that is being very generous
MOST PEOPLE??? LMAO! Most of the people Henry speaks to... So MOST PEOPLE in a group of GunHuggers is not exactly MOST NEW YORKERS!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Funny I never got polled as a registered voter If this was such a success Cuomo would have been on the news telling NYers how many people registered under it, although we will never hear it because it was a complete failure. Most people say only 10% registered and I think that is being very generous
I remember when they passed NY's Seat Belt Law. MOST PEOPLE SAID THEY WOULD NOT WEAR THEM! Now compliance is between 85 and 90 percent!
Just like NY's Seat Belt law, there will be those few GunHuggers who will never obey the law, and will be prosecuted for it.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
I remember when they passed NY's Seat Belt Law. MOST PEOPLE SAID THEY WOULD NOT WEAR THEM! Now compliance is between 85 and 90 percent!
Just like NY's Seat Belt law, there will be those few GunHuggers who will never obey the law, and will be prosecuted for it.
As I suspected was the whole reason over the safe act which was turn law abiding citizens into criminals, 99% of assault weapons in NYers hands will never be used in a crime yet you wish to punish them. This is the reason registration was so low box, you make the perfect case for why people shouldn't and WON'T
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
MOST PEOPLE??? LMAO! Most of the people Henry speaks to... So MOST PEOPLE in a group of GunHuggers is not exactly MOST NEW YORKERS!
So do you believe the number is higher, those I know won't register theirs so are you saying those gunhuggers are lying?
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Exactly what I expected you to say, now why would you disarm the real 1st people who have to deal with the criminal. As I posted before cops show up after a crime has been committed 99% of the time, that means they're not the 1st responders they are the 2nd responders to the criminals. It makes more sense for the real 1st responder (the victim) to be the one more heavily armed to deal with the situation.
Who protects the person that has armed federal agents with military armaments and snipers outside your ranch, there to collect unpaid fees and confiscate your property?
What did Bunkerville teach the Occupy Protesters? You won't get beat down, tasered, and pepper sprayed if you have comparable and adequate means of self defense.
As I suspected was the whole reason over the safe act which was turn law abiding citizens into criminals, 99% of assault weapons in NYers hands will never be used in a crime yet you wish to punish them. This is the reason registration was so low box, you make the perfect case for why people shouldn't and WON'T
So tell me again why you need an assault weapon Henry??? So far your only reason to own one is (LMAO) BECAUSE THE POLICE HAVE EM'.
The police have assault weapons so that they aren't outgunned by criminals... So why do you need one unless you are going to battle criminals... (and you are not)
The police have body armor to protect them from criminals... So why do you need body armor unless you are going to battle with criminals... (and your not)
Really Henry. You keep posting that you NEED (not want, but NEED) an assault weapon, yet you don't tell us why???
Could it be to kill your own neighbors who happen to be in the police? or your own neighbors who are in the military???
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Who protects the person that has armed federal agents with military armaments and snipers outside your ranch, there to collect unpaid fees and confiscate your property?
What did Bunkerville teach the Occupy Protesters? You won't get beat down, tasered, and pepper sprayed if you have comparable and adequate means of self defense.
Some were tasered although that was before word got out and militia moved in to help Bundy and his family, the BLM backed down for now but militia are still on scene, heard more are still heading there up to 5000.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Some were tasered although that was before word got out and militia moved in to help Bundy and his family, the BLM backed down for now but militia are still on scene, heard more are still heading there up to 5000.
Since you won't answer the question Henry... I an only surmise that you NEED AN ASSAULT WEAPON TO KILL OTHER AMERICANS SERVING IN THE POLICE AN MILITARY. You won't post it, but your every post says it.
It's called "domestic terrorism".
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
So tell me again why you need an assault weapon Henry??? So far your only reason to own one is (LMAO) BECAUSE THE POLICE HAVE EM'.
The police have assault weapons so that they aren't outgunned by criminals... So why do you need one unless you are going to battle criminals... (and you are not)
]
Unless the police can be at my house the very second a criminal attempts something then why wouldn't I be armed with what gun I'm used to and trust. But you and me both know cops respond after the crime, so even with all their firepower it would do me and my family no good. Its easy to talk when you live where you do and crime is almost non-existent. So go ahead and rely on someone you don't know how far away they are to save you, my gun is a lot closer then the nearest cop, I'll rely on that.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."