Of course not. "Every single weather variance" is WEATHER, not Climate Change.
exactly. but there are elements in the climate change group that try to do just that.. IMHO, they are just giving fuel to the deniers that they are chicken little's and actually hurt their position more than help it.
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Climate deniers have their own reasons for denying what 97% of climate scientists agree on. It's ok with me. They can believe what they want.
I wonder if a Climate Change Denier who had a heart valve problem... would he go to a witch doctor who would use a dead chicken and some bones to cure his heart valve? Or would he have the procedure done by experts in the field with a very reliable track record for curing his heart disease?
Would a Climate Change Denier use some untested, unproven drug to cure his illness, or would he follow the advice of 97% of doctors and use a proven, tested and reliable cure for his condition.
My guess... Climate Change Deniers would go with the SCIENCE, not the HYPE.
Quoted Text
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities, and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Climate deniers have their own reasons for denying what 97% of climate scientists agree on. It's ok with me. They can believe what they want.
I wonder if a Climate Change Denier who had a heart valve problem... would he go to a witch doctor who would use a dead chicken and some bones to cure his heart valve? Or would he have the procedure done by experts in the field with a very reliable track record for curing his heart disease?
Would a Climate Change Denier use some untested, unproven drug to cure his illness, or would he follow the advice of 97% of doctors and use a proven, tested and reliable cure for his condition.
My guess... Climate Change Deniers would go with the SCIENCE, not the HYPE.
Why not claim that 100% of climate scientist believe the change in global climate temperatures are caused by humans? Aren't the 3% of those scientists that are skeptical just "deniers" anyways? Their opinions don't even count in consensus science.
Why not claim that 100% of climate scientist believe the change in global climate temperatures are caused by humans? Aren't the 3% of those scientists that are skeptical just "deniers" anyways? Their opinions don't even count in consensus science.
Perhaps this will explain the 3% for you:
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Then why even mention the 3% as scientists? It doesn't make sense to mention them as scientists since apparently their scientific study on the subject is allegedly manipulated. So 100% of scientists agree, there is no skeptics in climate science. That's a statistical anomaly in the science community science scientists are skeptics by nature.
Then why even mention the 3% as scientists? It doesn't make sense to mention them as scientists since apparently their scientific study on the subject is allegedly manipulated. So 100% of scientists agree, there is no skeptics in climate science. That's a statistical anomaly in the science community science scientists are skeptics by nature.
I'm sure you can find a "scientist" somewhere who will disagree with the theory of gravity, if paid enough $$$.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Logged
