When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
We are advised NOT to judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works.
Notice that he doesn't have to read this off a teleprompter.
It's the same ole same ole that he's been spouting for 20 years. I would hope that he has it memorized by now!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Okay, and what, specifically, do you find objectionable or inaccurate in what he says? Mocking him doesn't refute his message. Where are you saying he is wrong? I find a lot in what he says. Parts of my home, Schenectady, have become a fourth-world country. Some of my friends can't spend anything at all for entertainment, as they are in danger of having their homes seized. Local businesses are being sued by their employees, fighting for the last nickel. I'd say that there is definitely something wrong, and it is not Ron Paul, but present government that is giving us the 'same ole same ole, and that the status quo is clearly not working. Maybe you are one of the "I got mine" crowd, content with the way things are because they aren't too bad for you, personally. Well, I have mine, too, but I will still look for causes and solutions when I see that what we are doing now is clearly not working for so many of us. That doesn't make me insane. If thinking for oneself is now considered insane, no wonder we're in so much trouble.
Okay, and what, specifically, do you find objectionable or inaccurate in what he says? Mocking him doesn't refute his message. Where are you saying he is wrong? I find a lot in what he says. Parts of my home, Schenectady, have become a fourth-world country. Some of my friends can't spend anything at all for entertainment, as they are in danger of having their homes seized. Local businesses are being sued by their employees, fighting for the last nickel. I'd say that there is definitely something wrong, and it is not Ron Paul, but present government that is giving us the 'same ole same ole, and that the status quo is clearly not working. Maybe you are one of the "I got mine" crowd, content with the way things are because they aren't too bad for you, personally. Well, I have mine, too, but I will still look for causes and solutions when I see that what we are doing now is clearly not working for so many of us. That doesn't make me insane. If thinking for oneself is now considered insane, no wonder we're in so much trouble.
Ron Paul is a trickle downer... It's never worked, ever, but that doesn't stop them from the same ole "Cut Taxes" as a cure for all ills. Cut benefits for those out of a job or on the bottom rung of the ladder while handing cash to those on top.
Just one example... Give a poor working slob another $100 and he'll probably buy groceries, or pay some bills or even take his spouse out for dinner. Give the 1% another $100 and it will be tax sheltered and stashed in an offshore account.
Which one puts money back into the community and which one does absolutely nothing for the country and those in need?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
it's trickle down just as much as it is trickle up....
the fact is that no matter what....'THEY' CONTROL THE FAUCET AND THE DRAIN.....
....for the collection of taxes on a virtual value fiat system, ENOUGH COMFORT IS SUBJECTIVE.....
basketball/baseball/hollywood etc stars who 'came from a 'poor/bad' childhood' still live with their demons no matter how much they think they have 'enough comfort' in their mansions etc.....
the issue is that we all 'look up' and say 'good for them they made it. I'll have to count my blessings because they deserved it more.'
either way the system will decide how many links will be in your chain...
so when we leave the land to live in/on something else that someone else controls then we call it civilized society?
everyone has their niche in a man made system...top/middle/bottom....
that's why the minimum wage will ALWAYS be minimum no matter how much we raise it....but your garden will NEVER be minimum your chickens will NEVER be minimum, your well will never be MINIMUM ETC ETC ETC....
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
In order to give the poor slob $100 there has got to be a job for him to do and that's what's missing in your equation.
No just give some poor slob $100. Throw it out the window of a car when you drive by a middle class or poor neighborhood. The money will stay in the community. Create jobs, pay taxes etc.
Throw that same $100 at the top 1% there will never be one cent paid in taxes generated from that $100. No jobs, no reinvestment in the community.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
No just give some poor slob $100. Throw it out the window of a car when you drive by a middle class or poor neighborhood. The money will stay in the community. Create jobs, pay taxes etc.
Throw that same $100 at the top 1% there will never be one cent paid in taxes generated from that $100. No jobs, no reinvestment in the community.
Trickle down theory does not trickle down. You are correct.
You seem to support the government on most issues.
You blame corporate America for what the government does, again supporting the government.
The government is the entity that treats corporations more equally than others.
Ron Paul is a trickle downer... It's never worked, ever, but that doesn't stop them from the same ole "Cut Taxes" as a cure for all ills. Cut benefits for those out of a job or on the bottom rung of the ladder while handing cash to those on top.
Just one example... Give a poor working slob another $100 and he'll probably buy groceries, or pay some bills or even take his spouse out for dinner. Give the 1% another $100 and it will be tax sheltered and stashed in an offshore account.
Which one puts money back into the community and which one does absolutely nothing for the country and those in need?
This post tells me you know nothing about Ron Paul. He doesn't support "trickle down", he voted against the bank bailouts, Obama voted for them.
Start understanding what trickle down means and what Ron Paul's philosophy is before making wildly inaccurate claims. Ron Paul supported banks FAILING, not saving the trickle downers(the banks). YOUR PARTY supported saving the wealthy banks with taxpayer money rather than letting them fail.
I can't believe box didn't mention Number 2 being in the audience, you can see him at 4:13 in. This is enough proof for box to believe Ron Paul is the leader of a evil corporation
Man, 2 Austin Powers pictures in 1 day, I need some sleep
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
No just give some poor slob $100. Throw it out the window of a car when you drive by a middle class or poor neighborhood. The money will stay in the community. Create jobs, pay taxes etc.
Throw that same $100 at the top 1% there will never be one cent paid in taxes generated from that $100. No jobs, no reinvestment in the community.
what you fail to realize is that they are one in the same....you seem to give GREAT value to that $100...if the 'poor middle class' person gets that $100 it has a kind of magical power of great value....when giving it to the 1% they find it to be worth $1.
again your projecting value/worth on an inanimate object...sure we have to use $ but how people use it/collect it etc (not much different than collecting rocks/cars) is what people will have in the end.
if a person seeks to break their bondage this is not where to get those bonds broken. the 1% are still in bondage because without the 98% licking their a$$es they have nothing.
no participating in the system is probably the closest to freedom anyone could have. Almost envious of the 'poor homeless'.
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS