On post 453 at 311 pm, I asked cicero to back up the statement below. As of 10:40 tonight, he has refused.
Shultz:" I endorses killing 7 pound babies in the womb".
He's whined, he's ducked he's hid, he's covered... he's made up lies, he's offered excuses... He's done everything but answer the question.
I'll ask again... Not for some BS excuse or some political rhetoric... just post a link to Shultz making the above statement.
Cissy posted that Shultz said: " I endorses killing 7 pound babies in the womb". Of course she never did. And Cissy isn't man enough to admit he was either mistaken or lying.
It kinda says a lot about his character.
I posted her public statement. I provided the context to her statement. I don't know what else to tell ya box.
I think I'm going to write an email to Paul Tonko and ask him if he stands with the DNC chair on killing 7 lb babies in the womb.
OK box, I fixed it for you. I corrected the Twitter mistake, and changed it to press release, I changed "endorse" to supporta mother and doctor's right to kill a 7 pound baby in the womb
Why do you assume I'm a glenn beck fan? I don't listen to him or watch him. What's that have to do with Shultz's Twitter message press release, publicly endorsingsupporting the of killing right of a mother and her doctor to kill a 7lb baby in the womb?
OK box, I fixed it for you. I corrected the Twitter mistake, and changed it to press release, I changed "endorse" to supporta mother and doctor's right to kill a 7 pound baby in the womb
I just love when Debbie (aka. Syphilis Suzy) opens up her mouth. You can always expect hilarious spin to try and backtrack whatever this vile woman says.
Now remember, the lefty-jihadis think that this is 'mainstream' thinking. That's why she's the DNC Chair.
"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'
I posted her public statement. I provided the context to her statement. I don't know what else to tell ya box.
I think I'm going to write an email to Paul Tonko and ask him if he stands with the DNC chair on killing 7 lb babies in the womb.
That would fit your profile on this issue. Pathetic. Cicero, living a lie, and lovin it.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
That would fit your profile on this issue. Pathetic. Cicero, living a lie, and lovin it.
Please, help me correct the lie. What was Deathermann implying in her statement responding to Paul's specific question about killing 7 lb babies in the womb? What did she mean exactly when she said she SUPPORTS(not endorses to not to upset box) the decision of the mother and doctor as to the fate of the 7 pound baby in the womb? What was she supporting(not endorsing). There are two choice the mother and doctor have - to go full term and deliver the 7 lb baby, or abort the pregnancy and kill the baby. Debbie's press release supports BOTH options.
Please, help me correct the lie. What was Deathermann implying in her statement responding to Paul's specific question about killing 7 lb babies in the womb? What did she mean exactly when she said she SUPPORTS(not endorses to not to upset box) the decision of the mother and doctor as to the fate of the 7 pound baby in the womb? What was she supporting(not endorsing). There are two choice the mother and doctor have - to go full term and deliver the 7 lb baby, or abort the pregnancy and kill the baby. Debbie's press release supports BOTH options.
In some instances, so do I. And in some instances so does Rand Paul. Would Rand Paul support killing both the mother and the fetus if that were the only choice? Or would he opt to abort the dying fetus to save the life of the mom?
This is silly Cicero and you know it. You got caught in a lie and you've been running from it ever since. Pathetic.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
I just love when Debbie (aka. Syphilis Suzy) opens up her mouth. You can always expect hilarious spin to try and backtrack whatever this vile woman says.
Now remember, the lefty-jihadis think that this is 'mainstream' thinking. That's why she's the DNC Chair.
Oh, box has been working hard to put the genie back in the bottle. Box won't help me interpret what she meant by her statement. But he's absolutely sure that my interpretation is wrong, and it doesn't mean she supports the mother and doctors right to end the life of a 7 lb baby in the womb.
Oh, box has been working hard to put the genie back in the bottle. Box won't help me interpret what she meant by her statement. But he's absolutely sure that my interpretation is wrong, and it doesn't mean she supports the mother and doctors right to end the life of a 7 lb baby in the womb.
Your interpretation of her words is irrelevant. You lied about what she said, and you know it.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
In some instances, so do I. And in some instances so does Rand Paul. Would Rand Paul support killing both the mother and the fetus if that were the only choice? Or would he opt to abort the dying fetus to save the life of the mom?
This is silly Cicero and you know it. You got caught in a lie and you've been running from it ever since. Pathetic.
In any instance she supports the abortion of a 7 lb baby in the womb. As she said, PERIOD...END OF STORY. That implies there is no instances that would legally protect the 7 lb baby.
Not running from anything box. You are chasing to redefine Debbie's statement. Debbie left no wiggle room for specific instances. She clearly states, WHATEVER the mother and doctor decide in ANY instance, Debbie supports the decision. PERIOD...END OF STORY. She made not exceptions in her statement. She actually made it clear that there are NO EXCEPTIONS.
Your interpretation of her words is irrelevant. You lied about what she said, and you know it.
I didn't lie about anything. I posted her exact statement. You may not like how it reads. But I certainly did not lie. If I lied, I wouldn't have posted her statement or links to her statement.
Trust me...I feel for ya box. Debbie really screwed the pooch on this one. You're gonna have to work hard straighting this mess out. Only 28% on Americans agree with on-demand abortion up to birth.
I didn't lie about anything. I posted her exact statement. You may not like how it reads. But I certainly did not lie. If I lied, I wouldn't have posted her statement or links to her statement.
Trust me...I feel for ya box. Debbie really screwed the pooch on this one. You're gonna have to work hard straighting this mess out. Only 28% on Americans agree with on-demand abortion up to birth.
I have no problem with her 'exact statement'. You like when you gave your OPINION of what her statement and posted it as if Shultz said it. She didn't and you know it. You lied.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Early Wednesday, Rand Paul refused to tell The Associated Press whether he would support exceptions for abortions in instances of rape or incest or if the birth of a child would risk the mother’s life. (I wonder if Rand Paul would Kill a 107 pound mother when her pregnancy is toxic and about to kill her?)
Rand Paul then answered... "YES! I'd kill the Btich"! (Or at least that's how someone like Cicero would "interpret" his statement!
How lame.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
You are part of the 28% of Americans that agree with on-demand abortion up until birth. Of course you have no problem with her statement. Period...End of story.(I love that)
You are part of the 28% of Americans that agree with on-demand abortion up until birth. Of course you have no problem with her statement. Period...End of story.(I love that)
I do have a problem with your lie. It says much more about YOU than it does about Shultz.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
"Rand Paul’s problem with female interviewers" Washington Post
Quoted Text
Paul seems to misunderstand the nature of running for president. It is not a college lecture class where you talk and other people listen and take notes. It is an active back and forth between the candidate, voters and, yes, the media. And, that means that sometimes you get asked things you think are (a) stupid, (b) unfair or, often, both.
Quoted Text
The perception of Paul as not only resistant to tough questions but mocking and dismissive of them is not a good one. At all. Paul needs to understand that the political campaign he has just embarked on is a very different thing than his 2010 Senate campaign in Kentucky. The level of scrutiny, the number of people always watching and the hurdles of credibility are all much, much higher. Coming across as thin-skinned when faced with the gentlest of "tough" questions isn't a very encouraging development for those who would like to see Paul emerge as the GOP's standard-bearer sometime next year.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Logged
