It is ILLEGAL to have signs up more than 45 days before election

This sign BY AND FOR THE DEMS were showing up on facebook in August!!!!!!


Let's the cheerleader for the city dems explain this one.


Also, I can't help but laugh so hard.  Notice who is supporting the dems.  It's the store that was ILLEGALLY dealing with food stamps.

Narutally, the dems support are from those getting handouts from the taxpayers, just like a troll sponging off the taxpayers.

PRICELESS.....the stimulus is gonna trickle back....and guess what? the government store houses will be empty and we'll be begging
china for more chicken and eating the grain we so graciously trade with russia....

Porterfield. Doesn't surprise me.  Most likely a minority owned business.... customer base....the minorities and poor.

A couple years back I tried to call this so called representatiave of the people.  No answering machine.  So I waited a couple weeks and tried again.  Still no machine so then I emailed her.

My email address Taxpayer@internet provider. My email technical info that goes with email did not identify me by name only Taxpayer.  The only way for her to know who it was from was to go to the internet service provider and request it.

I told her I have been trying to contact her by phone but couldn't.  The last time I tried to email council people   ("King" "Brucker" although I did not identify them and I had tried many times over the years), they never responded so this first email was just a test and I told her so.  

I told her I have been trying to call her on the phone and am now trying to see if email works.  

My reason for calling was at the last cc meeting she told folks to call the city regarding street lights that were out and I wanted to let her know that folks can fill out a National Grid form found the home page of the city website to tell them where street lights were out.  I had used it and it works figuring she would bring this up at the next meeting.  I never did send the info to her.

Her first response and only one  "Who are you?"  I waited a coupled more weeks then responded.

My reply was " at this time I would rather not divulge that but am a taxpayer and have a few general questions."  "Maybe as time goes on I will feel more comfortable"

No response.

My take on it:
  
1. You must qualify who you are.  Black, White, Business owner, landowner, renter, rich or poor.

She is a two faced representative of the people and will get voted in because of her race. She represents only the poor and there are more poor than anything else in this city. She may attend events that includes everyone but never gets involved in council business if it isn't related to the poor and minorities.

Identifying myself as "taxpayer" or by my given name which most of the times will indicate my nationality and race should not change the answer she would give to any question regarding city business but it is very apparent it will and does.

She does not represent the city at large.

Those that have read my posts over the years know I am one who stays on topic, facts based and am always polite this would not change in anything I would have written to her.  Even if it did all she would have to do is block my email address in her email program so as not to be subjected to such a dialoge.

If I remember correctly, last year at election time, Porterfield's phone was disconnected.

So maybe her number will be changed again during campaign time.

And then it's budget time too, she's one who what, had a failed business.  She also does not live as a normal adult female, independent of mama (sound familiar), she obviously blocks people (sound familliar) and I'd be interested in knowing what legislation she has sponsored, other than the recognition for this group or that group.

Yeah, why do the council agendas have the legislation and I think it's only written as sponsored "by councilmember" and not list the individual council member's name.

By the way, Cel, she has a facebook page too, only shows how she "helps" the people, i.e., the poor (on the dole).

I've been told King Philips girl on the council doesn't respond either, an acquaintence asked her a simple question which should have had a simple answer and she never responded.  The departmetn head could have been contacted and gotten an answer but there was a point to trying to get an answer via the council rep.

The only one it seems that responds is Riggi.

Mr. Riggi is the only one who understands what being an officeholder in the city means. It's not like being prom queen.

Quoted from Cel

Porterfield. Doesn't surprise me.  Most likely a minority owned business.... customer base....the minorities and poor.

A couple years back I tried to call this so called representatiave of the people.  No answering machine.  So I waited a couple weeks and tried again.  Still no machine so then I emailed her.

My email address Taxpayer@internet provider. My email technical info that goes with email did not identify me by name only Taxpayer.  The only way for her to know who it was from was to go to the internet service provider and request it.

I told her I have been trying to contact her by phone but couldn't.  The last time I tried to email council people   ("King" "Brucker" although I did not identify them and I had tried many times over the years), they never responded so this first email was just a test and I told her so.  

I told her I have been trying to call her on the phone and am now trying to see if email works.  

My reason for calling was at the last cc meeting she told folks to call the city regarding street lights that were out and I wanted to let her know that folks can fill out a National Grid form found the home page of the city website to tell them where street lights were out.  I had used it and it works figuring she would bring this up at the next meeting.  I never did send the info to her.

Her first response and only one  "Who are you?"  I waited a coupled more weeks then responded.

My reply was " at this time I would rather not divulge that but am a taxpayer and have a few general questions."  "Maybe as time goes on I will feel more comfortable"

No response.

My take on it:
  
1. You must qualify who you are.  Black, White, Business owner, landowner, renter, rich or poor.

She is a two faced representative of the people and will get voted in because of her race. She represents only the poor and there are more poor than anything else in this city. She may attend events that includes everyone but never gets involved in council business if it isn't related to the poor and minorities.

Identifying myself as "taxpayer" or by my given name which most of the times will indicate my nationality and race should not change the answer she would give to any question regarding city business but it is very apparent it will and does.

She does not represent the city at large.

Those that have read my posts over the years know I am one who stays on topic, facts based and am always polite this would not change in anything I would have written to her.  Even if it did all she would have to do is block my email address in her email program so as not to be subjected to such a dialoge.

You are obviously a racist if you have anything other than praise and compliments for a minority person.

it is the city's powers that be that 'create' minorities. They create the division.

Quoted from GrahamBonnet

You are obviously a racist if you have anything other than praise and compliments for a minority person.

I would love to hear Porterfield's excuse on why she refuses to communicate with anyone outside of a select few.  The only way to connect with her is meet her on the hill or at some entitlement event.  Don't get me wrong. The children are suffering by the lack of parenting and need all the help they can get to help them grow and excell but there are other concerns in this city too.  She does not representative the people, all citizens in this city

Bet if I sent an email to Riggi with the id as Taxpayer he would respond without batting an eye.

What we seem to have here in Schenectady today is a banana republic, only without the bananas.

Quoted from mikechristine1

Notice who is supporting the dems.  It's the store that was ILLEGALLY dealing
with food stamps. Naturally, the dems support are from those getting handouts from the taxpayers, just like a troll sponging off the taxpayers.

   What else is new? The DEMS don't care about residency laws {that they enacted}, Federal affirmative action laws or laws for hiring people with disability. Another slumlord for the working together team. Got a machine? And yeah there's a difference. Rage against the machine Nov 5th.