Thankfully, much has changed in those 83 years Henry.
Yup those men and women had more rights back then, now we might as well be back on the plantation serving our masters.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Unless you have some information to show Bin Laden is alive, or some information to give doubt to his widely reported death from news agencies across the world as well as his own al Qaeda group... I'll stick with the news reports... you can continue to believe the Conspiracy Crazies.
You don't trust "right wing" "militia" people questioning the Bin Laden death, but you trust an Al Qaeda website?
I was wrong, you are a Tupperware salesman's dream customer.
Of course making Bin Laden a martyr would be no benefit to Al Qaeda recruitment. Al Qaeda websites are now the source of record for Box.
Yup those men and women had more rights back then, now we might as well be back on the plantation serving our masters.
Yea, Barack Obama would be considered 'a negro' back then so people who think like you would be happy to exclude him from running for the presidency. Also women wouldn't have the right to vote and only land owners could vote in many states. And you think that "men and women had more rights back then"!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
...and the Bush v Gore 2000 election decision. I don't want to hear box cry about that decision either. Since those in the black robes know all.
Of course we all know that Al Gore won the popular vote and might have eventually been found to win the election if the Supreme Court hadn't stepped in. I disagree with the electoral college as a dinosaur that no longer serves a purpose... but IF Bushy won that vote, then he should be president.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
You don't trust "right wing" "militia" people questioning the Bin Laden death, but you trust an Al Qaeda website?
You misstate my case (IMAGINE THAT)
I don't have a problem with anyone questioning Bin Ladens death or many other things. I await their case. So far their case is... "Um... I don't have a case but ya never know when people are lian'... Yep the gubment always lies!" Again, do you have any credible evidence that the BinLaden raid was a hoax???
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
I don't have a problem with anyone questioning Bin Ladens death or many other things. I await their case. So far their case is... "Um... I don't have a case but ya never know when people are lian'... Yep the gubment always lies!" Again, do you have any credible evidence that the BinLaden raid was a hoax???
We didn't make the claim, the government did, it is up to them to show proof according to you and they showed none, all your answers are just avoiding the questions we asked. What are you going to respond to this with, a Rand Paul hit piece
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Yea, Barack Obama would be considered 'a negro' back then so people who think like you would be happy to exclude him from running for the presidency. Also women wouldn't have the right to vote and only land owners could vote in many states. And you think that "men and women had more rights back then"!
Actually no it would of been the government that would have kept him out not me, the government you so much support. It would have been the government which would have stopped women from voting, again not me. Truth is you would have supported the governments Jim Crow laws because the government said they were legal, those who fought against it would just be anti-government extremist to you.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Again, do you have any credible evidence that the BinLaden raid was a hoax???
You referenced an Al Qaeda website as your proof. That was your credible evidence. I am saying there is no evidence. Your logic is that in light of no evidence, so then it must be a fact. Or, your evidence is, Obama said it happened, said he wasn't going to show the evidence to the public because it was too gruesome. Then you reference an Al Qaeda website to corroborate the Whitehouse’s claim.
Box has a point about rights in the old days, except Barack is not a descendent of slaves as much as he likes to attach himself to that old issue. Here's a problem with all this "safety" surveillance. Yes, businesses and so forth have too much of your information, but they exploit it for monetary gain. The information the government collects will be and has been used for political purposes. This is dangerous, because it gives big money like the banks complete power over everyone. Remember that governor we used to have? The one that as AG was starting to police the banks and Wall Street? Remember how the dirt on him was obtained? That guy who was one of the inspectors over in Iraq, too. I am not defending their actions, it is just when somebody goes up against the powers that be and the government spies on them to get some dirt, and the eliminates them, it ought to concern all of us. That was Bush, but it continues with Barack, and he is just as bad of a globalist/corporatist constitution shredder as Bush was.
Secret Service Visits Outspoken Obama Critic – Because of Tweets
J.O. Box will report us for being critical of The Leader, so watch out.
"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Box has a point about rights in the old days, except Barack is not a descendent of slaves as much as he likes to attach himself to that old issue.
I wouldn't call 1967 "the old days".
In many states if you had "one drop" of black ancestry you were considered all black, and had nothing to do with being a former slave.
Quoted Text
The one-drop rule is a historical colloquial term in the United States for the social classification as Negro of individuals with any African ancestry; meaning any person with "one drop of Negro blood" was considered black. The one-drop rule was not adopted as law until the 20th century: first in Tennessee in 1910 and in Virginia under the Racial Integrity Act of 1924 (following the passage of similar laws in several other states).
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Actually no it would of been the government that would have kept him out not me, the government you so much support. It would have been the government which would have stopped women from voting, again not me. Truth is you would have supported the governments Jim Crow laws because the government said they were legal, those who fought against it would just be anti-government extremist to you.
I would not have supported Jim Crow laws then just as I don't support voting right laws being proposed today that limit the rights of all classes to vote. To say that those laws were 'legal' is a fact, to say that those laws were 'just' is a different matter.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
We didn't make the claim, the government did, it is up to them to show proof according to you and they showed none, all your answers are just avoiding the questions we asked. What are you going to respond to this with, a Rand Paul hit piece
The govt didn't show "proof" of BinLaden's death, they showed 'evidence'. Just as I keep asking for your 'evidence' that the story is a hoax.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Logged
