Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Schenectady’s next vital step
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Schenectady’s next vital step Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 353 Guests

Schenectady’s next vital step   This thread currently has 1,439 views. |
5 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 » Recommend Thread
RotterdamResident
May 26, 2013, 5:07am Report to Moderator
Sr. Member
Posts
481
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
30 days 9 hours 5 minutes
Quoted Text
Schenectady’s next vital step is to improve its neighborhoods
Sunday, May 26, 2013
By Roger Hull/For The Sunday Gazette  


Twenty years ago, Neil Golub and I, aided greatly by area businessmen and women, created Schenectady 2000. Five years ago, then-mayor Brian Stratton, aided by community groups throughout the city, developed a plan for the city labeled Schenectady 2020.

Schenectady 2000 had largely accomplished many of its goals during the first five years of its existence, including, importantly, the creation of Metroplex. Unfortunately, Schenectady 2020 has, as is the case with most comprehensive plans, largely sat on bookshelves gathering dust.

The goals of the two efforts were and are similar — the revitalization of Schenectady. Schenectady 2000 sought to improve access points to the city, develop connections between the city’s many attractive sites, make downtown vibrant once more, and give residents hope that Schenectady’s future was bright. For Schenectady 2020, the focus is on neighborhoods.

The most visible sign of Schenectady’s rebirth, of course, is downtown. After a bruising fight to create a funding vehicle for Schenectady 2000’s plans, Metroplex came into existence. In recent years, thanks to the leadership of Ray Gillen and the Metroplex board, many of those plans have been implemented, and downtown is a dramatically different — and better — place.

Sure, critics can quibble about the lack of retail. And some of us keep waiting for a new train station and the second track to Albany, which is (finally) scheduled and which will bring more people to the city. However, no one can reasonably argue that Schenectady is not a far better place than it was in 1993.
More important result

There was, however, another — and, I would argue, a far more important — result than physical structures that came out of Schenectady 2000: A belief that we, the residents of this city, can make things better.

Now is the time to bring back the optimism that came out of Schenectady 2000. Despite the success of downtown, that optimism has faded, in large part because the city’s neighborhoods have been neglected.

For those of us involved in Schenectady 2000, the intention was to begin with downtown, not to end with its revitalization. Our intention was always to turn our attention to our neighborhoods as soon as possible. Indeed, as the legislation creating Metroplex provides, funds can be used for parking or pocket parks in the corridors to the city, so derelict buildings in some neighborhoods can be torn down.

Of course, focusing on the corridors alone will not solve our neighborhood problems. What will? People.
Enlisting residents

By enlisting the residents of Schenectady in quality-of-life issues like cleanups and bridge paintings, as the hundreds of volunteers (including all Union College first-year students) did during the 1990s, we can turn this city’s neighborhoods into a source of pride once more.

Let’s not reinvent any wheels, though; instead, let’s use the Schenectady 2020 plan, and all the work that went into it, as the basis for neighborhood revitalization by the people who live here.

Government has its role to play. It can do the code enforcement referenced in the Schenectady 2020 plan. It can, as Vince Riggi has urged, work with the police department on issues like graffiti, litter, and loud music. It can, as the 2020 plan suggests, actively work with neighborhood groups. And it can use the resource of the Schenectady County Jail inmates to supplement the efforts of residents (inmates who might both welcome the opportunity to get outside and who would, in a small way, be helping a community they had harmed).

In the final analysis, though, we should not rely on government, especially not a government that is facing financial disaster as a result of poor past decisions. We should, we must, rely on ourselves.

Let’s take the Schenectady 2020 plan off the shelves, dust it off, apply its name to a new volunteer effort to improve our neighborhoods, and embrace the challenges we face. Let’s make Schenectady 2020 more than a plan on paper, so that, by 2020, we will have neighborhoods of which we can all be proud.

Having lived in several different parts of the country, but having now lived in Schenectady longer than I have lived anywhere else, I believe we have incredible assets, assets that far exceed those found in most cities. Our physical assets — the Stockade, Proctors, City Hall, Central Park, the Mohawk River, the GE Realty Plot and Union College, among others — are great, if not stunning. So, too, is the diversity of our neighborhoods and our people.

With revitalized neighborhoods that capture the flavor of our city, we will highlight that diversity and bring back the charm that once graced Schenectady. Without a real focus on our neighborhoods, though, we run the risk of jeopardizing the good work that Schenectady 2000 spawned and Metroplex is implementing. As exciting as the developments downtown are, we must recognize they cannot be sustained if surrounding neighborhoods are allowed to crumble.
Greatest resource

Schenectady 2000 worked because we were able to enlist the support of hundreds of volunteers. It is time again to turn to our people, since they are our greatest resource. By substituting Schenectady 2020 for Schenectady 2000, by implementing ideas spelled out in the 2020 plan, and by putting people to work, we can do for neighborhoods what we did for downtown.

Together, we can make a difference; together, and with the proper leadership, we can bring back our neighborhoods. It is time, it is way past time, to begin doing so in a coordinated, focused way.

Roger Hull lives in Schenectady. The Gazette encourages readers to submit material on local issues for the Sunday Opinion section.

http://www.dailygazette.com/news/2013/may/26/hull/


"Holy crap!! Did she EAT Bob??"

Not everything on the Interweb is truth. Only a gullible fool would believe otherwise.

I am neither Left wing nor Right wing. I am gro-wing.
Logged
Private Message
RotterdamResident
May 26, 2013, 5:11am Report to Moderator
Sr. Member
Posts
481
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
30 days 9 hours 5 minutes


"Holy crap!! Did she EAT Bob??"

Not everything on the Interweb is truth. Only a gullible fool would believe otherwise.

I am neither Left wing nor Right wing. I am gro-wing.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 67
CICERO
May 26, 2013, 5:29am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted Text
Government has its role to play. It can do the code enforcement referenced in the Schenectady 2020 plan. It can, as Vince Riggi has urged, work with the police department on issues like graffiti, litter, and loud music. It can, as the 2020 plan suggests, actively work with neighborhood groups. And it can use the resource of the Schenectady County Jail inmates to supplement the efforts of residents (inmates who might both welcome the opportunity to get outside and who would, in a small way, be helping a community they had harmed).


So Hull suggests using inmates sitting in the county jail, who are mostly in jail for non violent drug crimes to clean up the city that put them behind bars and destroyed their lives to begin with.  Isn't that essentially slave labor?  That's a resource?-


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 67
joebxr
May 26, 2013, 6:03am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


So Hull suggests using inmates sitting in the county jail, who are mostly in jail for non violent drug crimes to clean up the city that put them behind bars and destroyed their lives to begin with.  Isn't that essentially slave labor?  That's a resource?-


The inmates chose to commit a crime....they destroyed their own life, the city didn't!
I know that's hard for you to understand, because it's simple logic and doesn't fit your agenda!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 67
Libertarian4life
May 26, 2013, 7:36am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
By revitalizing the neighborhoods he is talking about cracking down on over burdened taxpayers and taking more properties.

Most inmates are in jail for victimless crimes against the state.

Their presence is due to a  combination of racial profiling, targeted enforcement and imported cops.

If we hired only inner city black cops to target Glenville for inmates, the jails would be all white.

Crime is everywhere. The inmate population is representative of where the racist targeting is performed.

Drug prisoners are victims of nothing more than crimes against the state.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 4 - 67
mikechristine1
May 26, 2013, 7:53am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
Again, Schenectady MUST lower taxes on the homeowners!!!!!!!!!!!

There are properties downtown, owned by BILLIONAIRES who are the cronies of the dems, and the dems have chosen to exempt their cronies from paying taxes.   Instead, the dems chose to make the financially struggling homeowners pay not only for the taxes on their own homes, but also for the billionaire owners of property downtown.

Galesi ALONE could pay ALL the taxes of ALL his properties in Schenectady county AND pay ALL the property taxes, school taxes, assorted fees of the homeonwers -- for ALL the homeonwers throughout THE WHOLE COUNTY of Schenectady and still he would be able to live beyond any rich man's wildest dreams and he would never want for anything.   He is that filthy rich.   But McC, the DEMS on the council, the DEMS on the county legis, and plex DEMS would rather hurt the homeowners, make them pay.

WHY?

What purpose has it served to exempt these billionaires from paying property taxes?   What have the financially struggling people IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS gotten as a return on their "investment," on a return of the DEMS STEALING from the homeowners, to give to these billionaires.  

Just what is the return on that "investment??????  

Shall we list a FEW of the returns?

Highest taxes in the country
Falling tax base in the city
Falling home values
Falling home sales
Falling home sale prices
Homes that won't sell after a year
Higher crime
Less snow plowing
Streets loaded with potholes
Less maintenance of the watermains
Less maintenance of sewers
A city that claims a surplus via STEALING money form other funds to create a FAKE surplus
A city that does not pay it's bills and then claims it has a surplus
Higher crime
Increasing blight
Drastically increasing numbers of vacant residential units.
Increase in tax foreclosures
A city that financially penalizes the homeonwers for a LITTLE PEELING PAINT -- how can the homeowners afford to fix up their homes after they have been ROBBED and FORCED to pay for all the lavish buildings downtown that are owned by millionaires?
Failing schools
No retail downtown
Goverment bakeries
Goverment theaters
Government gyms
Goverment gin mills
Government restaurants
Government appliance store
Government hotels
Low wage jobs that require some public assistance with which to support the family

What have the homeowners gotten?????    

Let's see WHO IS MAN ENOUGH to provide EVIDENCE of how the neighborhoods and the homeonwers taxpayers and residents lives and financial statuses have improved.  

NOT A CHANCE that there will be any list produced here of improvements in life and finances for the homeowners in the neighborhoods.






Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 67
CICERO
May 26, 2013, 8:01am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Libertarian4life

Drug prisoners are victims of nothing more than crimes against the state.


The most egregious crime of all.  Crimes against the state.

US - The highest prison population in the WORLD.  That's what freedom looks like.

Make sneezing illegal, government and corporations can have more cheap prison labor to sweep streets.

Good thing is, the Neil Golub, Roger Hull, Joebxr, and box a rox generation of statist/fascist  maniacs are on their way out.  The victimless crimes called the war on drugs is winding down.  



Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 67
Ididntdoit
May 26, 2013, 9:32am Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
236
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
19 days 8 hours 49 minutes
Question- I'd like to know why some of you believe drug dealing/use is a victimless crime?  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 67
joebxr
May 26, 2013, 9:40am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from Libertarian4life

Most inmates are in jail for victimless crimes against the state.
Their presence is due to a  combination of racial profiling, targeted enforcement and imported cops.
If we hired only inner city black cops to target Glenville for inmates, the jails would be all white.
Crime is everywhere. The inmate population is representative of where the racist targeting is performed.
Drug prisoners are victims of nothing more than crimes against the state.


crime
    illegal act: an action prohibited by law or a failure to act as required by law
    illegal activity: activity that involves breaking the law
    immoral act: an act considered morally wrong

Simple enough, but difficult for some to accept because once again
it doesn't allow them to try and advance their personal agendas
and biased hatred!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 67
CICERO
May 26, 2013, 9:44am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Ididntdoit
Question- I'd like to know why some of you believe drug dealing/use is a victimless crime?  


Because consuming drugs does not hurt anybody but the consumer.  Selling drugs to a consumer that wants drugs is a service, not a crime.  Just ask Pfizer.  You can buy there stock at about $29 a share.

Prohibition makes it a crime.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 67
joebxr
May 26, 2013, 9:50am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Because consuming drugs does not hurt anybody but the consumer.  Selling drugs to a consumer that wants drugs is a service, not a crime.  Just ask Pfizer.  You can buy there stock at about $29 a share.

Prohibition makes it a crime.


So you come home early one day and find your daughter or son snorting coke.....
Do you get mad or angry?  If so, WHY?
Does your child face discipline from you? WHY?
Are they committing a crime in your eyes?
Did the person that gave them the drugs or sold them the drugs commit a crime
in your opinion?


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 67
CICERO
May 26, 2013, 10:03am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr


crime
    illegal act: an action prohibited by law or a failure to act as required by law
    illegal activity: activity that involves breaking the law
    immoral act: an act considered morally wrong

Simple enough, but difficult for some to accept because once again
it doesn't allow them to try and advance their personal agendas
and biased hatred!


Ahhh...Yes!  In the democratic state of Germany in 1935, violation of the Nuremberg laws would have been a criminal act.  

Yup, I understand joebxr, violating laws such as the Nuremberg Laws, or the Fugitive Slave Act would make you a criminal.  Simple logic, everybody is property of the state, if you violate the moral commands of the state, you are a criminal.  Even if you don't harm anybody.  This is the dangers of collectivism.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 67
joebxr
May 26, 2013, 10:18am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Ahhh...Yes!  In the democratic state of Germany in 1935, violation of the Nuremberg laws would have been a criminal act.  

Yup, I understand joebxr, violating laws such as the Nuremberg Laws, or the Fugitive Slave Act would make you a criminal.  Simple logic, everybody is property of the state, if you violate the moral commands of the state, you are a criminal.  Even if you don't harm anybody.  This is the dangers of collectivism.


Nuremberg....what a jacka$$$
It's definition...too simple for your narrow mind?

Why not answer the questions instead of trying your usual diversion tactics.


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 67
Tommy
May 26, 2013, 11:01am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Quoted from joebxr


So you come home early one day and find your daughter or son snorting coke.....
Do you get mad or angry?  If so, WHY?
Does your child face discipline from you? WHY?
Are they committing a crime in your eyes?
Did the person that gave them the drugs or sold them the drugs commit a crime
in your opinion?


Of course, you discipline your child, for the same reason you scolded them for trying to play with the stove when they were a toddler.
It's for the child's well being, but should you have your child thrown in jail?
Should YOU be thrown in jail for not reporting it?

More Americans have died as a direct result of the war on drugs, than have died in every war we're ever been in COMBINED, starting at the revolution.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 67
CICERO
May 26, 2013, 11:03am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr


So you come home early one day and find your daughter or son snorting coke.....
Do you get mad or angry?  If so, WHY?
Does your child face discipline from you? WHY?
Are they committing a crime in your eyes?
Did the person that gave them the drugs or sold them the drugs commit a crime
in your opinion?


Yes
Yes
No
No

If you come home and find your daughter passed out drunk with 12 empty Budweiser commemorative  memorial day cans scattered around the house, and she was impregnated from a date rape while she was passed out - is Anheuser Bucsh that brewed, marketed, and distributed the alcohol a criminal?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 67
5 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Schenectady’s next vital step

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread