Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Rental Inspections > Unconstitutional?
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Rental Inspections > Unconstitutional? Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 274 Guests

Rental Inspections > Unconstitutional?   This thread currently has 2,645 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Admin
March 24, 2013, 6:24am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
‘La-la land’ another name for Schenectady


    Schenectady is beating a dead horse with its rental inspection law, and landlords live in the United States — not in “la-la land,” as claimed in the Gazette’s March 16 editorial.
    In 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that, despite a city claiming that these inspections are for health and safety conditions, warrantless inspections of rental units are unconstitutional and violate landlords’ Fourth Amendment rights. Since 1981, New York courts have consistently ruled that cities and towns cannot compel landlords to submit to inspecting their rental units, and cannot penalize landlords for refusing to do so.
    The Schenectady rental law discriminates between its landlords, as it does not require the inspection of rented single-family homes, owneroccupied two-family houses or properties rented to Section 8 tenants. The law, however, is targeting a group of landlords, requiring the search of their tenants’ bedrooms and closets, making public their insurance records and their tenants’ names, all in violation of the landlords’ and tenants’ privacy rights.
    Schenectady was built for over 100,000 residents and has plenty of housing for the 64,000 people living here now. Furthermore, the city is continuously issuing permits to builders who are building new apartments.
    Potential tenants have many apartments to choose from, but the city is ironically assuming that tenants have no choice but to live in substandard conditions.

    MOHAMED A. HAFEZ
    Schenectady The writer is a landlord.



http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....r03005&AppName=1
Logged
Private Message
rpforpres
March 24, 2013, 9:11am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,891
Reputation
89.47%
Reputation Score
+17 / -2
Time Online
113 days 4 hours 29 minutes
Good for Mr. Hafez he knows the truth  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 8
Patches
March 24, 2013, 11:32am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
4,839
Reputation
63.16%
Reputation Score
+12 / -7
Time Online
40 days 11 hours 18 minutes



Truth....there is no justice in that word.......system is so corrupt.....and discriminatory....what do you expect when it's about party affiliation instead of citizen affiliation ....and the rights of the citizens
....
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 8
CICERO
March 24, 2013, 3:39pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Metroplex will attract 36,000 people, not to worry.  Even if they don't, a select few will become wealthy trying.  Now go thank Phillip Morris and his political enablers for exploiting the residents of Schenectady County.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 8
senders
March 24, 2013, 3:44pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
Metroplex will attract 36,000 people, not to worry.  Even if they don't, a select few will become wealthy trying.  Now go thank Phillip Morris and his political enablers for exploiting the residents of Schenectady County.


yup...

don't forget about IDA help too.....


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 8
TakingItBack
March 25, 2013, 9:07am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,579
Reputation
80.00%
Reputation Score
+8 / -2
Time Online
71 days 7 hours 28 minutes

If it were about safety then these areas would not be ignored.

"rented single-family homes, owneroccupied two-family houses or properties rented to Section 8 tenants. "


Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid - John Wayne


TIP TO NEW VISITORS TO THIS FORUM - To improve your blogging pleasure it is recommended to ignore (Through editing your prefere) the posts of the following bloggers - DemocraticVoiceofReason, Scotsgod08 and Smoking Bananas.  They continually go off topic, do not provide facts and make irrational remarks. If you do not believe me, this can be proven by their reputation scores or by a sampling of their posts.  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 8
bumblethru
March 25, 2013, 1:02pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
all i can say is that there are scumbag tenants and there are scumbag landlords.....just like there are good ones of both.

From what we hear in the city....most of the scumbag landlords don't even live anywhere remotely close to the county...let alone the state and sometimes even the country!! Might i also say that from what i hear.... the code enforcers do NOTHING!!!!!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 8
mikechristine1
March 25, 2013, 1:15pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
Potential tenants have many apartments to choose from,


So let the dem leaders explain WHY they are building so many more apartments??????     Just something to spend the taxpayers money and help their rich cronies get richer by not paying taxes because the rich cronies then fill the dem party coffers, etc. etc.


Many apartments to choose from.   Many vacant EXISTING apartments.    Many vacant EXISTING houses for sale.   Many occupied houses for sale and not selling.

But according to a democratic voice, the city is in a renaissance but we never read how that conclusion is arrived at.

Mixed feelings on rental inspections.   But making public to the tenants and the city the insurance information, that is critical for the rest of the taxpayers.   How much did the homeowner taxpayers in the city pay for the demolition of the absentee landlord property at McClellan and Eastern?








Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 8
benny salami
March 25, 2013, 1:32pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
Metroplex will attract 36,000 people, not to worry.  Even if they don't, a select few will become wealthy trying.  Now go thank Phillip Morris and his political enablers for exploiting the residents of Schenectady County.


Like the M and M boys? Did you hear the latest? More gin mills and bread. Where da circus? Metrograft has to go. It has outlived it's purpose. If any.
Want to hear Judy defend more Brinks trucks of taxpayer money dumped.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 8
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Rental Inspections > Unconstitutional?

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread