they have to say that if they want the grant money and corporate support of 'new inventions'

Box still thinks science is decided by a majority of chosen scientist.  Lol!  

A consensus of scientists (including Darwin) believed blacks and Irish were genetically inferior, hence justifiable slavery.  

Quoted from senders

they have to say that if they want the grant money and corporate support of 'new inventions'

Didn't they find out scientist were altering the facts for that very reason a couple years ago

Quoted from Henry

Didn't they find out scientist were altering the facts for that very reason a couple years ago

corporate welfare via intellectual property laws/theories supported by $$$$$

Peer reviewed... Oh, never mind.  
FACTS are useless when dealing with right wing OPINION!

Quoted from Box A Rox

Peer reviewed... Oh, never mind.  
FACTS are useless when dealing with right wing OPINION!

No one is disputing the fact that climate change occurs.

Being against creating new taxes that will magically stop the world from changing is then issue.

You cannot stop climate change. All the money on Earth can't stop climate change.

Quoted from Box A Rox

Peer reviewed... Oh, never mind.  
FACTS are useless when dealing with right wing OPINION!

peers are the ones next to you with the same gun point at their head and/or the same $$ waved before them

climate CHANGE does exist....but the REASONS differ and are unproven,,,kind of like evolution has a sh!t load of holes in
it,,,until there's $$ in the equation to help you get to an answer

Quoted from senders

peers are the ones next to you with the same gun point at their head and/or the same $$ waved before them

climate CHANGE does exist....but the REASONS differ and are unproven,,,kind of like evolution has a sh!t load of holes in
it,,,until there's $$ in the equation to help you get to an answer

Exactly right.

Every money grabbing thief wants to use a natural phenomena to shake down the public.

Too bad Obomber wasn't around milleniums ago, he could have prevented the Ice Age.

You can challenge Einstein's Theory of Relativity, but GOD FORBID you challenge global cooling oops, I mean, global warming, sorry again, what I really mean is climate change.

Quoted Text

Challenging Einstein usually a losing venture
For more than a century, everyone from physicists to the Nazi Party— which encouraged the publication of the tract "One Hundred Authors Against Einstein" — has tried to find cracks in his work. And all have failed.

On Thursday, the world's biggest physics lab unveiled a shocking finding: that one type of subatomic particle was clocked going faster than the speed of light. If true — a big if, even the scientists there concede — it could undercut Einstein's theories. Physicist Michio Kaku of City College of New York called it "the biggest challenge to relativity in 100 years."

Antonio Ereditato, who participated in the European experiment as head of the Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics in Bern, knows what is at stake. After his team fielded two hours of technical questions, some a bit sharp, from a skeptical audience Friday, Ereditato had a beer in hand and was asked about the idea that his work was challenging the secular saint of modern physics.

"Yes, that's why I'm concerned," he said with a laugh.

There's a long history of experimental results that at first seem to contradict relativity, only later to be found to fit neatly with the theory Albert Einstein loved for its simplicity and elegance.

"It's dangerous to lay odds against Einstein," said Rob Plunkett, a physicist at the Fermilab near Chicago who has tried similar speed-of-light experiments and will now try to test the new findings.

Even Einstein himself was wrong in 1929 when he called his cosmological constant his "biggest blunder." He introduced the constant in his general relativity theory as a force that keeps the universe from collapsing. In 1998, new findings showed that the universe is accelerating and that in general Einstein's "blunder" wasn't a mistake.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com.....-of-light/50518790/1

"Progressives" are so open minded to changing their views and progressing in light of new information, ACCEPT when talking about global cooling/warming climate change.  That is a dogmatic believe that the progressive does not allow new facts to be introduced or their theory to ever be challenged.  

Just more evidence that the progressive is nothing more than a central planning, all knowing, all seeing, always in control statist.  

Quoted from CICERO

Box still thinks science is decided by a majority of chosen scientist.  Lol!  

A consensus of scientists (including Darwin) believed blacks and Irish were genetically inferior, hence justifiable slavery.  

The Earth was flat and the center of universe according to 99% of the scientists of another time.

Quoted from Box A Rox

Arctic Temperatures Reach Highest Levels In 44,000 Years

New research shows that average summer temperatures in the Canadian Arctic
over the last century are the highest in the last 44,000 years, and perhaps the
highest in 120,000 years.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/24/arctic-temperatures-highest-44000-years_n_4157863.html

So was the century 120,100 years ago hotter than the 20th century?  I would assume so, since they stopped at that date.

Now I'm going to show you why is story is so misleading...

'Warmth' is a very relative term when dealing with the artic region. The Obamabots at HuffPo (and Boxy for that matter) want you to think that the ice is melting and palm trees are starting to grow near the north pole.

This is simply not the case. In fact, HuffPo, fails to acknowledge that the artic summer was the SHORTEST EVER RECORDED. There are usually 90 days where the temperature reaches above freezing. This year there was less than 45 days.

So here is this massive warmup....You tell me if there is anything to worry about!

http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n.uk.php

  

EDIT: The HuffPo story is total bullshit, click on past years.

Australia’s newly elected prime minister pulled no punches when giving his thoughts on the country’s carbon tax, which he says must be abolished as quickly as possible.

“The carbon tax is bad for the economy and it doesn’t do any good for the environment,” Abbott told The Washington Post. “Despite a carbon tax of $37 a ton by 2020, Australia’s domestic emissions were going up, not down. The carbon tax was basically socialism masquerading as environmentalism, and that’s why it’s going to get abolished.”

“If the Labor Party wants to give the people of Australia a Christmas present, they will vote to abolish the carbon tax. It was damaging the economy without helping the environment. It was a stupid tax. A misconceived tax,” Abbott added.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/25/aussie-pm-carbon-tax-is-socialism/#ixzz2iw03Hw2R