Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Russian Sub Nears U.S. East Coast
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Russian Sub Nears U.S. East Coast Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 69 Guests

Russian Sub Nears U.S. East Coast  This thread currently has 626 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Admin
November 6, 2012, 6:25am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
Russian Sub Skirts Coast
Russian attack sub detected near East Coast

BY: Bill Gertz
November 5, 2012 5:05 pm

A Russian nuclear-powered attack submarine cruised within 200 miles of the East Coast recently in the latest sign Russia is continuing to flex its naval and aerial power against the United States, defense officials said.

The submarine was identified by its NATO designation as a Russian Seirra-2 class submarine believed to be based with Russia’s Northern Fleet. It was the first time that class of Russian submarine had been detected near a U.S. coast, said officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of anti-submarine warfare efforts..............................>>>>.........................>>>>........................http://freebeacon.com/russian-subs-skirt-coast/
Logged
Private Message
Box A Rox
November 6, 2012, 6:46am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
The Rooshins are coming, the Rooshins are coming!!!





The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 10
Tommy
November 6, 2012, 2:15pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Somebody might want to inform those nitwits that those subs have been doing that for 50 years, and we've been doing the same to them.

This is just a bunch of war mongering a$$holes trying to lend credence to Rmoney's claim that Russia is our most feared enemy, and that the cold war should be restarted for the benefit of him, and his friends.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 10
CICERO
November 6, 2012, 4:55pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Tommy


and that the cold war should be restarted for the benefit of him, and his friends.


Is this opposed to keeping Obama and his friends in power for their benefit?  Rhetorical question, I know they are one in the same.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 10
Tommy
November 6, 2012, 4:59pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Is this opposed to keeping Obama and his friends in power for their benefit?  Rhetorical question, I know they are one in the same.


Romney wants to give the pentagon $2.1 trillion that they didn't even ask for, so you tell me.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 10
CICERO
November 6, 2012, 5:17pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Tommy


Romney wants to give the pentagon $2.1 trillion that they didn't even ask for, so you tell me.


Oh, it's not the spending that concerns you just whose friends get the money.  I know no matter who wins, I won't geta penny.  I'm not on welfare or a defense contractor.  I just PAY.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 10
Tommy
November 6, 2012, 5:42pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Oh, it's not the spending that concerns you just whose friends get the money.  I know no matter who wins, I won't geta penny.  I'm not on welfare or a defense contractor.  I just PAY.


No, those extra trillions are completely unnecessary, and Obama isn't the one requesting it.
That's 2 trillion that WE would have to pay.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 10
IraRotterdam
November 6, 2012, 5:58pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
580
Reputation
12.50%
Reputation Score
+1 / -7
Time Online
116 days 19 hours 32 minutes
If Romney wins the bear growls & the eagle will fly.

If Obama wins, all will be OK because "wait till after theb election" will be reality.

DOTS V DONA FOOLSKY's
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 10
Tommy
November 6, 2012, 6:06pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Quoted from IraRotterdam
If Romney wins the bear growls & the eagle will fly.

If Obama wins, all will be OK because "wait till after theb election" will be reality.

DOTS V DONA FOOLSKY's


Ira, adults are talking.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 10
CICERO
November 6, 2012, 6:57pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Tommy


No, those extra trillions are completely unnecessary, and Obama isn't the one requesting it.
That's 2 trillion that WE would have to pay.


I agree it is unnecessary,  I'm pointing out it will be spent on something else unnecessary that benefits Obama's rich friends.  WE will pay either way, only who WE pay is what is different.

Obama's budget isn't $2.1 trillion less than Romney's.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 10
Tommy
November 6, 2012, 11:22pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


I agree it is unnecessary,  I'm pointing out it will be spent on something else unnecessary that benefits Obama's rich friends.  WE will pay either way, only who WE pay is what is different.

Obama's budget isn't $2.1 trillion less than Romney's.


But hopefully, that money will be earmarked to be used on something of alleged value, and not borrowed just to spend.
One would have to be an idiot to think that the insane amount of money it takes to have a president elected doesn't have to be paid back in some way.  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 10
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread