Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
SCHDY DEMS ALLOW WELFARE CIPIENTS TO OWN HOUSES
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  SCHDY DEMS ALLOW WELFARE CIPIENTS TO OWN HOUSES Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 282 Guests

SCHDY DEMS ALLOW WELFARE CIPIENTS TO OWN HOUSES  This thread currently has 709 views. |
2 Pages « 1 2 Recommend Thread
CICERO
September 30, 2012, 10:49am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Libertarian4life
If you choose to decry those with assets getting public assistance, then the Metroplex should be the first thing to go.

It provides free money, zero interest loans and low or no cost properties to corporations that have a great deal of assets.

Why does everyone go after the little guys first.

Just in recent history, over $56 million was given to the corporate friends and family plans.

To add to their asset portfolios.




True, the hardship of the taxpayers would be handed back to the corporate elite.


I don't decry one welfare over another.  They both distort economic reality.  Both inflate real value using borrowed money and reallocating resources.  Whether it is non productive people mortgaging homes using unearned income, or downtown businesses receiving grants, subprime loans  and tax exemptions.  All this does is paper over the economic reality.  

Modern America was built on debt, it has reached a point which it cannot be sustained.  The gimmicks being used are distractions to give people hope in light of this reality.  They either let the dollar collapse and liquidate the debt or we all will eventually be on welfare.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 15 - 16
senders
September 30, 2012, 3:25pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted Text
No Right Turn
Andrew Harrop, Natan Doron

Online

13 September 2012

Britain’s enduring support for public services

The political right, and many on the left, have long assumed that the people of Britain want the state to be smaller. But new Fabian research suggests that progressive advocates for the state and tax-funded public services have reason to be confident. ‘No Right T urn’ is based on original qualitative and quantitative research which explores how people respond to some of the main arguments for and against the state and public services. Over nine hours of focus groups plus a nationally representative opinion poll provide a rich picture of how the public view the debate around the role of the state.

The idea that we all depend on public services at different stages of our lives, and that tax-funded public ser vices are a way of caring for those less fortunate in our society , were both popular . So too were the themes of contribution and desert, with the importance that public services play throughout everyone’s life cycle a key theme.

The left should resist the urge to seek out a middle-way that cedes ground to the right on public ser vice debates. Labour can be confident and bold in making pro-state arguments and can set out a collectivist case for maintaining high quality, tax-funded public services.


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 16 - 16
2 Pages « 1 2 Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  SCHDY DEMS ALLOW WELFARE CIPIENTS TO OWN HOUSES

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread