Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fox Climate Change Coverage 'Misleading'
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    What's Going On In The Rest Of The world  ›   Fox Climate Change Coverage 'Misleading' Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 76 Guests

Fox Climate Change Coverage 'Misleading'  This thread currently has 735 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Box A Rox
September 25, 2012, 8:35am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes

• Over a recent six-month period, 93 percent of Fox News Channel’s representations of climate science
were misleading (37 out of 40instances).
• Similarly, over the past year, 81 percent of the representations of climate science in the Wall Street
Journal’s opinion section were misleading (39 out of 48 instances).

UCS’s examination finds that the misleading citations include broad dismissals of human-caused
climate change, disparaging comments about individual scientists, rejections of climate science
as a body of knowledge, and cherry picking of data. Fox News Channel citations also included several
discussions in which misleading claims dominated accurate ones. Furthermore, much of this coverage
denigrated climate science by either promoting distrust in scientists and scientific institutions or
placing acceptance of climate change in an ideological, rather than fact-based, context.

Union of Concerned Scientists
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/global_warming/Is-News-Corp-Failing-Science.pdf


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message
Shadow
October 15, 2012, 6:28am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it

    The figures reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012 there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures
    This means that the ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996

By David Rose

PUBLISHED: 16:42 EST, 13 October 2012 | UPDATED: 20:21 EST, 13 October 2012

The world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago, according to new data released last week.

The figures, which have triggered debate among climate scientists, reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012, there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures.

This means that the ‘plateau’ or ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. Before that, temperatures had been stable or declining for about 40 years.
global temperature changes

Research: The new figures mean that the 'pause' in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. This picture shows an iceberg melting in Eastern Greenland

The new data, compiled from more than 3,000 measuring points on land and sea, was issued  quietly on the internet, without any media fanfare, and, until today, it has not been reported.

This stands in sharp contrast  to the release of the previous  figures six months ago, which went only to the end of 2010 – a very warm year.

Ending the data then means it is possible to show a slight warming trend since 1997, but 2011 and the first eight months of 2012 were much cooler, and thus this trend is erased.

Some climate scientists, such as Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, last week dismissed the significance of the plateau, saying that 15 or 16 years is too short a period from which to draw conclusions.

Others disagreed. Professor Judith Curry, who is the head of the climate science department at America’s prestigious Georgia Tech university, told The Mail on Sunday that it was clear that the computer models used to predict future warming were ‘deeply flawed’.
Even Prof Jones admitted that he and his colleagues did not understand the impact of ‘natural variability’ – factors such as long-term ocean temperature cycles and changes in the output of the sun. However, he said he was still convinced that the current decade would end up significantly warmer than the previous two.Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci.....t.html#ixzz29MwkLgGp
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 10
bumblethru
October 15, 2012, 6:48am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
.............still waiting for the ICE AGE that was predicted in the 70's by the liberal tree hugging nut jobs!!!

OH....they probably were just mistaken.....


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 10
Tommy
October 16, 2012, 2:58pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
The only ones who believe that climate change is not occuring, are the buffoons that were home schooled on AM radio, and Fox.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 10
senders
October 16, 2012, 3:12pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Tommy
The only ones who believe that climate change is not occuring, are the buffoons that were home schooled on AM radio, and Fox.


climate change has happened for millions of years on earth...we just happen to be alive now....anyone here
growing scales to become amphibians....we need to evolve now...HURRY


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 10
CICERO
October 16, 2012, 3:42pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Tommy
The only ones who believe that climate change is not occuring, are the buffoons that were home schooled on AM radio, and Fox.


Yep, earths climate changed many many times over the course of billions of years.  Global warming and cooling happened many times.  Even before humans used fossil fuel.  

Anybody that believe the earths climate is constant and predictable are the buffoons that were public schoolled by some dope smokin granola eatin science teacher followed by a steady diet of NPR and PBS.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 10
Shadow
October 16, 2012, 3:56pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
True dat
Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 10
Tommy
October 19, 2012, 9:13pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Yep, earths climate changed many many times over the course of billions of years.  Global warming and cooling happened many times.  Even before humans used fossil fuel.  

Anybody that believe the earths climate is constant and predictable are the buffoons that were public schoolled by some dope smokin granola eatin science teacher followed by a steady diet of NPR and PBS.


It's obvious that you, yourself went to an inferior public school (I'm still waiting for you to reimburse me for that, being you don't believe in collectivism), because the ozone layer didn't eat itself.
Reagan blamed it on the trees.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 10
Shadow
October 20, 2012, 6:30am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Proven fact if you cut down too many trees there is less oxygen and more co2 in the air.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 10
senders
October 20, 2012, 8:43am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
Proven fact if you cut down too many trees there is less oxygen and more co2 in the air.


replant....mcmansions built by the mover shaker think tanks should be doing that...according to them the rest of us are
too stupid, but they have us all running around with .05 deposits and coupons like a$$holes, yet the state keeps
purchasing 'the woods'......

there's nothing new under the sun.....

are everyone's scales growing? or are we 'at least' testing our offspring for evolutionary changes to prepare us for
the climate change and preservation of the human factor?

the water goes up and the water goes down


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 10
Tommy
October 20, 2012, 10:42am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Loggers in North America DO replant. The problem is thousands of square miles of South America being clear cut, and not replaced.
The "Save The Rainforest" people weren't doing it just save all the pretty trees, and birds.
It was about the world's oxygen supply.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 10
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread