Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Time for Obama to disclose donors
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  Time for Obama to disclose donors Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 131 Guests

Time for Obama to disclose donors  This thread currently has 449 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Rusty Shackleford
September 22, 2012, 11:45am Report to Moderator
Guest User
ROMNEY RELEASES TAX INFO: TIME FOR OBAMA TO DISCLOSE '08 DONORS

(Taken from story below..highlighted here for emphasis)
Barack Obama, on the other hand, hid behind the law and as of now still hasn't disclosed the names and addresses of any of his small dollar donors. This means that the public has absolutely no idea who it was who donated upwards of $125 million to our sitting president's campaign.


GOP nominee Mitt Romney, disclosed two full years worth of tax returns and twenty years worth of top-line tax information. From early reports, what we've learned is that the Romney's been very successful in life, paid the appropriate rate for investment earnings on monies he's already paid taxes on, and that unlike our stingy President and Vice president, he and Mrs. Romney have donated upwards of 30% -- millions upon millions to charity.

The media and Obama campaign have been whining, distracting, and crybabying for this information for months now. But we all know that getting what they want will never shut them up because the tax return narrative was never about anything other than beating Romney senseless at the request of the Obama campaign.

In a just world, though, the narrative would now turn towards demanding some vitally important transparency from our sitting president -- especially over something that is as relevant today as it ever was: The names and addresses of those who financed somewhere around 25% of President Obama's 2008 $600 million campaign.

Now that Obama and the DNC have pretty much caught up to Romney in the 2012 money game, the corrupt media is no longer as obsessed and concerned as they once were about all that awful outside fundraising. But money has been a big story throughout the 2012 election, and yet we still have absolutely no idea where a ton of Obama's 2008 contributions came from.

To be clear, I'm not talking about outside PACs and super PACs .

I'm talking about over 100 million of non-disclosed dollars that went right into the Obama campaign coffers.

Here's how this all came down….

In 2008, Obama broke his promise to accept federal campaign matching funds in order to raise unlimited money through his own fundraising operation -- much of it through the campaign's website. By law, a presidential candidate is required to disclose the names and addresses of those behind all of his donations … except small-dollar donations, defined as anything $200 or less.

In the spirit of transparency, John McCain disclosed the names and addresses of every single one of his donors, including small dollar donors.

Barack Obama, on the other hand, hid behind the law and as of now still hasn't disclosed the names and addresses of any of his small dollar donors. This means that the public has absolutely no idea who it was who donated upwards of $125 million to our sitting president's campaign.

At no time, not during the 2008 election or this one, has the same media obsessed over taxes returns Mitt Romney has already filed with IRS ever once pressured Obama to follow John McCain's lead and tell us just who it was that financed around a quarter of his record-breaking $600 million campaign, most of it over the WORLD wide web.

And not even Slate bought Team Obama's absurd excuse that compiling this list would be too time-consuming:

Barack Obama refuses to release the names of the 2 million-plus people who have given his campaign less than $200. According to campaign officials, it would be too difficult and time-consuming to extract this information from its database. So how come we were able to do it in a couple hours? Not literally—we don't have access to the campaign's list of donors—but we created a database of similar size and format in a Web-ready file and posted it online.

But that's about as far as the media took its criticism.

Instead, the corrupt media has done what the Obama campaign ordered it to do: blindly portray these small dollar donations as proof of Obama's popularity with the regular folk.

And yet…

The Campaign Finance Institute (CFI) noted in past releases that donations are not the same as donors, since many people give more than once. After a more thorough analysis of data from the Federal Election Commission (FEC), it has become clear that repeaters and large donors were even more important for Obama than we or other analysts had fully appreciated.

So it might well be that this undisclosed $125 million wasn't entirely the result of college hipsters enamored with The One, but rather big dollar donors giving more than once to stay under the radar.

Which would be bad enough.

But the worse-case scenario is the idea of illegal donations coming from outside the United States.

We simply don’t know and the reason the Obama campaign gives for not telling us just isn't credible -- which only makes me more suspicious.

But when you're Obama and you have a lapdog media scared to death to kick over any rock that might result in bad news for you, you don't have to offer a credible reason.

You can just win the presidency with $125 million that came from God knows where.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/21/Time-For-Obama-To-Disclose-08-Donors
Logged
E-mail
A Better Rotterdam
September 22, 2012, 12:59pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
903
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+6 / -4
Time Online
38 days 7 hours 17 minutes
ah, the Dems and Reps worked together to hide where all this money came from. Anyways, who cares who the small donors are? This is a pretty lame talking point to try and get the attention off of Mitt not paying the tax rates we do..... This is what happens when your policies are so close to the president's, you need to create issues out of thin air.

Johnson 12!!!!
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 4
Shadow
September 22, 2012, 5:46pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
When the rich stop making money where are you going to steal it from then because what's the sense of making money only to have the government take it away from you.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 4
A Better Rotterdam
September 23, 2012, 12:35am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
903
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+6 / -4
Time Online
38 days 7 hours 17 minutes
yawn,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, another talking point, as if a slight raise in taxes on the  super rich will send them into poverty....
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 4
senders
September 23, 2012, 6:22am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from A Better Rotterdam
yawn,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, another talking point, as if a slight raise in taxes on the  super rich will send them into poverty....


you're right....so how about a FLAT SIMPLE TAX....so that 'poor folk' can actually see how 'poor' they are...and so they
don't have to wait for that pesky 'tax return savings account' THAT EARNS NO F'EN INTEREST..and so they
don't get jerked around by some podium banger about "I'm gonna give you poor slobs some more money in your
weekly paycheck, because I'm here to take care of you. this is the best deal for you because you're too stupid to
understand the tax code. Math is hard but accounting is harder. So if elected I will fix your sorry a$$es."

REMOVE THE CLASS WARFARE.....SHAME ON OUR LEADERS

FLAT TAX FLAT TAX FLAT TAX

they obfuscate using the tax code.....oh, calling it a code is correct....it's like a F'EN military code of communication
used against the plebs....


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 4
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread