|
senders |
September 26, 2012, 3:37am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
|
Looks like this is their ace in the hole. As the economy is still shakey at best and could falter with 1-2 major unstable events, they want the "gun loaded" just in case. Trouble is when a gun is loaded it's more likely to be fired, so would'nt doubt the prop. tax cap to be broken. If for nothing else than to keep up with the pensions/health ins. costs.
austerity? |
| ...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
|
|
|
|
|
benny salami |
September 26, 2012, 7:47am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
|
austerity?
Working together works! Working together works! Too small for a County/Too big for an insane asylum. |
|
|
|
|
Admin |
September 28, 2012, 5:05am |
|
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
|
Quoted Text
County tax cap hearing tonight
SCHENECTADY— The public will get a chance to weigh tonight in on whether the county Legislature should have the option to exceed the state’s 2 percent tax cap in its 2013 budget. The public hearing is scheduled for 6 p.m. in the legislature’s chambers at the County Offi ce Building. The date of the hearing represents the last business day before County Manager Kathleen Rooney must submit her budget to the Legislature. Legislators have also scheduled a special meeting at 6:30 Monday to consider a resolution aimed at overriding the tax cap. Legislators are also expected to host a budget review session following the Legislature’s committee meetings. With less than two weeks before her initial budget is due, Rooney requested the Legislature give her the flexibility to establish a tax levy increase greater than the cap would allow. Under the tax cap formula, the county can’t raise the budget by more than 2.95 percent, unless the Legislature votes to lift the cap.
http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....r01401&AppName=1 |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Admin |
September 29, 2012, 5:49am |
|
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
|
Quoted Text
Topping tax cap a divisive issue Opposing viewpoints aired at public hearing BY JUSTIN MASON Gazette Reporter
Lifting the state-imposed tax cap will have a crippling effect on already struggling homeowners in Schenectady County, a majority of speakers told legislators during a public hearing Friday evening. Many of the more than 50 people filling the Schenectady County Legislature’s chamber said the already high tax burden throughout the county is forcing people from their homes and causing others to contemplate a move either toward other more-affordable counties or even out of state. They argued a decision by the county Legislature to override a state imposed tax growth limit of 2.95 percent in the 2013 budget would have a dire impact on businesses and families struggling with the sluggish national economy. Niskayuna resident Rich Fisher questioned how the Legislature could consider exceeding the tax cap when the county is already among the highest taxed. He said additional tax increases could drive him from the county into a neighboring one after living here since 1987. “Saying you have to do this and we have to pay for it is wrong,” he said. “I’d even say it’s illegal.” Chamber of Schenectady County President Charles Steiner said breaking the tax cap would go against all the economic development progress that has been made in recent years. He advised the Legislature to take the same frugal attitude toward finances that many businesses and homeowners have taken in the down economy. “Every business and every resident have had to manage their budget and haven’t been able to mandate more revenue,” he said. But another vocal contingent of residents heading the county’s nonprofit agencies disagreed. They argued legislators should lift the cap so the county’s strong social service agencies — ones that might face dire funding cuts — can continue to adequately serve the segment of the population most in need. Deb Schimpf, executive director of the Schenectady Community Action Program, predicted the cuts to the county’s budget required under the tax cap could leave her organization strapped for money to pay its workers. She speculated that a cut in funding could result in the closing of shelters such as the Sojourn House in Schenectady, a home for women and their children that assisted roughly 130 families last year. “It’s quite possible without support, this house could close,” she said, adding that her organization could also lose 10 workers as a result of any cuts. “This all has an economic multiplier effect on our community.” Niskayuna resident Ann DiSarno lauded the county for maintaining a structure that has provided a vital assistance network for the elderly. She feared a county budget wedged beneath the tax cap could mean dismantling many of the services seniors have come to rely on. “It’s important for you to give yourself the opportunity to look at the whole system you have at hand here,” she said. TAX HIKE WARNING Last week, Schenectady County Manager Kathleen Rooney requested the Legislature give her the fl exibility to establish a tax levy increase greater than the cap would allow. County officials haven’t disclosed how much taxes could increase if the cap is overridden or precisely the cuts that would be required if it’s left in place. Lifting the cap would ultimately need to be approved by 60 percent of the Legislature's weighted vote, which went into effect this year. Under the new system, the vote of each city representative is worth slightly more than one, while the vote of each town representative is worth slightly less than one. The weighting is a legal system to establish political equity between municipalities. Legislators didn’t act on Rooney’s request Friday, but the Democratic majority had a conference immediately following the public hearing. The full body is expected to discuss the matter during a special meeting at 6:30 p.m. Monday. On Friday, Rooney declined to discuss any particulars about the budget, which she is due to present to the Legislature after the special meeting. She said she’s looking at “multiple scenarios” based on what legislators ultimately decide next week. County spokesman Joe McQueen said state law requires the Legislature to decide whether to override the tax cap before Rooney’s budget is proposed. He said 78 percent of the budget is nondiscretionary mandates and the remaining 22 percent includes items such as funding for nonprofi t agencies, the county library system and other popular programs. “There’s very little fl exibility,” he said. James Buhrmaster, the Legislature’s lone Republican, continued to speak against the override and even questioned whether he’d support a budget including any tax increase. He also speculated that majority Democrats would have a hard sell among their own members, considering seven are up for re-election next year and one — Angelo Santabarbara — is in the midst of a run for state Assembly. ........................>>>>.......................>>>>.......................http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....r00100&AppName=1
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Loki |
September 29, 2012, 6:04am |
|
Guest User |
Reading the article, I was pleasantly surprised to see the large turnout to speak last night. I am quite certain that all of those on this board opposed to the tax increase were in attendance to voice their opposition. I am sure that the 50 or so people who spoke were representative of the entire tax paying public.
As to the 59,950 who were not in attendance, you get what you deserve. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
BuckStrider |
September 29, 2012, 7:11am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
|
Quoted from 3303
Reading the article, I was pleasantly surprised to see the large turnout to speak last night. I am quite certain that all of those on this board opposed to the tax increase were in attendance to voice their opposition. I am sure that the 50 or so people who spoke were representative of the entire tax paying public.
As to the 59,950 who were not in attendance, you get what you deserve.
Thier mind was made up the second it was thought to go over the tax cap. There is no opposition party and this was merely a formality. |
| "Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women' |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Loki |
September 29, 2012, 7:22am |
|
Guest User |
Thier mind was made up the second it was thought to go over the tax cap. There is no opposition party and this was merely a formality.
BuckStrider, I do understand that. My comment was tongue in cheek. I do wonder though if any of the more out spoken members here took the time to voice their opinions in public. And although it is highly unlikely, I wonder what the reaction of the county legislature would be if say 3 or 4 thousand people were to show up and wait through the night to voice their opposition. There is strength in numbers, but my contention in other postings that there is an apathetic and complacent electorate would seem to be a more likely scenario. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|