Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
China's Forced Abortion Policy>Paid W/Tax Dollars
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    What's Going On In The Rest Of The world  ›  China's Forced Abortion Policy>Paid W/Tax Dollars Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 7 Guests

China's Forced Abortion Policy>Paid W/Tax Dollars  This thread currently has 2,296 views. |
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
Admin
June 15, 2012, 5:05am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes

Quoted Text
Chinese official explains forced abortion policy funded by Obama administration
BY MATTHEW CULLINAN HOFFMAN
Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:52 ESTComments (29)

In the video below, a “family planning” official with the government of Changsha City, in the Chinese province of Hunan, explains how she uses her friendly lieutenants to “persuade” women to have abortions when they exceed the country’s one-child limit. The interview with the official was done last Friday by Bob Fu of the Evangelical Protestant organization China Aid.

The case Mr. Fu is calling about is that of Cao Ruyi, 37, and her husband Li Fu. The two already have a six year old daughter, and now Mrs. Cao is being told she must allow doctors to kill her “illegal baby” (yes, those are the words used by the official) or pay a fine equivalent to $24,000 (four years of wages for the couple) in order to spare his life. She is currently imprisoned at a hospital, where she is surrounded at all times by 10-20 men whose job it is to “persuade” her to have a “voluntary” abortion.



Such is China’s ruthless population control program, a program that is aided heavily by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), an agency that the Obama administration is funding to the tune of $50 million per year despite U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell’s statement in 2002 that “UNFPA’s support of, and involvement in, China’s population-planning activities allows the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive abortion.”............................>>>>...........................>>>>......................http://www.lifesitenews.com/bl.....-by-obama-administra
Logged
Private Message
Admin
June 15, 2012, 5:11am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
Feng Jiamei, Chinese Authorities Apologise After Forcing Her To Abort Child At 7 Months
Huffington Post UK  |  By Sara C Nelson
Posted: 15/06/2012 08:33 Updated: 15/06/2012 10:45

Chinese officials have reportedly apologised to a woman who was forced to have an abortion at seven months.

Three people have been suspended as the incident, which occurred in Shaanxi province, is investigated, the BBC reports.

The probe, instigated by China's National Population and Family Planning Commission, began after a photo purporting to show Feng Jiamei lying in a hospital bed next to the bloody body of her aborted child circulated online. Huffington Post UK has seen the picture but has chosen not to publish it.

Abortions after the sixth month of pregnancy are prohibited in Chinese law......................>>>>.................>>>>...........................http://www.huffingtonpost.co.u.....onths_n_1599031.html
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 15
Libertarian4life
June 15, 2012, 7:01am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
I thought that China was selling the unwanted children to Americans.

With sleeper cell chips implanted in them.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 15
Box A Rox
June 15, 2012, 7:09am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
China had/has a real population problem.  Had they not put limits on kids when they did, they wouldn't be able
to feed their own population.
It's still a challenge.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 15
Libertarian4life
June 15, 2012, 7:19am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
China had/has a real population problem.  Had they not put limits on kids when they did, they wouldn't be able
to feed their own population.
It's still a challenge.


So the solution is terminate pregnancies?

Like I said, there is a no shortage of willing adoptive parents, willing to pay China.

I think that would also reduce the number of abortions in the US if they allowed the unwanted to be sold instead of aborted.

Hell, if the government offered to pay for any unwanted child $5,000 instead of an abortion, it would be a giant fast growing business.

It would put a serious dent in the number of abortions.

Poor people would obviously just start making a kid every year for the cash.

But hey, the newly saved almost abortion victims would become taxpayers someday.

The government might put a lien on them though.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 4 - 15
CICERO
June 15, 2012, 7:36am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Libertarian4life

But hey, the newly saved almost abortion victims would become taxpayers someday.

The government might put a lien on them though.


The pro abortion crowd never sees the victim of abortion as an asset.  They are always viewed as a liability and a drain on the social welfare system - the “we can't afford them" argument.  But as you just mentioned, that aborted fetus will become productive and pay taxes to the government beast.  

There was a time in history when human reproduction and high birth rate was a key to a society's productivity and prosperity.  Now, it is looked at as a drain on society and resources.    


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 15
Box A Rox
June 15, 2012, 7:44am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
No matter how you look at it, the earth has finite resources... and an upper limit to it's capacity to feed and provide
water to that population.

Now, or later, at some point... population control, voluntary or not, will be necessary or none of us will survive.
The earth has gone through many 'mass extinctions' in it's history.  Humans are not exempt from that possibility.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 15
bumblethru
June 15, 2012, 8:40am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
A couple that we know, went to china to adopt 'a baby girl'. This was about 5 years ago

China required them to stay in China for 2 weeks...which at the end of the 2 weeks they would be allowed to pick up their child and leave the country.(that was part of the deal) The couple was told that this was a way to help china's economy, assuming the americans would 'spend money' during their stay.

The couple obviously had no issue with this process since 2 years later, they went back and adopted another 'baby girl'.


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 15
CICERO
June 15, 2012, 8:48am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
No matter how you look at it, the earth has finite resources... and an upper limit to it's capacity to feed and provide water to that population.


Any scare tactic to justify totalitarians control.  

New species are discovered every year that we never knew existed, yet we know exactly the finite number of fossil fuels.

Like Grahambonnet says - just raise taxes, that will fix it, it fixes everything.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 15
UnadulteratedSchenectady
June 15, 2012, 9:45am Report to Moderator
We pick on Politicians. And A$$holes in General.
Baby Member
Posts
26
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+2 / -1
Time Online
1 days 4 hours 4 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
No matter how you look at it, the earth has finite resources... and an upper limit to it's capacity to feed and provide
water to that population.

Now, or later, at some point... population control, voluntary or not, will be necessary or none of us will survive.
The earth has gone through many 'mass extinctions' in it's history.  Humans are not exempt from that possibility.


It's too bad we couldn't apply your method of thought to the City of Schenectady welfare rolls.


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 9 - 15
senders
June 15, 2012, 3:08pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
China had/has a real population problem.  Had they not put limits on kids when they did, they wouldn't be able
to feed their own population.
It's still a challenge.


that's the nature of the beast.....EVOLUTION/ADAPTATION or what ever you want to call....ABORTION isn't their answer either.....
they should stop vaccinations and GET THE HELL OUT OF THE CITIES......

http://flowingdata.com/2009/11/13/land-mass-and-population-by-country/


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 15
BuckStrider
June 15, 2012, 7:45pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
China had/has a real population problem.  Had they not put limits on kids when they did, they wouldn't be able
to feed their own population.
It's still a challenge.


Total and complete bullshit. If food was an issue, then China's population would not have steadily increased over the centuries, let alone reach 1 billion people, nor would it be able to sustain such a large population.

While China has had instances of famine, they were on mostly a local levels with some escalations to regional levels...Well, until Mao's "Great Leap Forward" in 1958...That only resulted in (ca.) 45 MILLION people starving to death.

India has the second largest population and I dont see them killing thier unborn.




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 15
BuckStrider
June 15, 2012, 7:50pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
No matter how you look at it, the earth has finite resources... and an upper limit to it's capacity to feed and provide
water to that population.

Now, or later, at some point... population control, voluntary or not, will be necessary or none of us will survive.
The earth has gone through many 'mass extinctions' in it's history.  Humans are not exempt from that possibility.


Kill yourself.

Since you are now a retired,silver ponytail wanna-be elitest, you are useless to society and the only thing you do is suck up resorces better suited to the next generation.

Folow your own philosophy.





"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 15
Libertarian4life
June 15, 2012, 11:10pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes


It's too bad we couldn't apply your method of thought to the City of Schenectady welfare rolls.


Are you referring to the corporate welfare conglomerate sponsored by the metroplex. or the homeless and jobless citizens that need help?

It sure seems there is not shortage of help for Corporate welfare recipients.



Logged
Private Message Reply: 13 - 15
Libertarian4life
June 15, 2012, 11:12pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider


Total and complete bullshit. If food was an issue, then China's population would not have steadily increased over the centuries, let alone reach 1 billion people, nor would it be able to sustain such a large population.

While China has had instances of famine, they were on mostly a local levels with some escalations to regional levels...Well, until Mao's "Great Leap Forward" in 1958...That only resulted in (ca.) 45 MILLION people starving to death.

India has the second largest population and I dont see them killing thier unborn.


The mass graves in China show that almost all the children they found were females.

Females are a liability to them.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 15
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    What's Going On In The Rest Of The world  ›  China's Forced Abortion Policy>Paid W/Tax Dollars

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread