Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Goodbye Slurpees, Goodbye Big Gulp
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Goodbye Slurpees, Goodbye Big Gulp Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 215 Guests

Goodbye Slurpees, Goodbye Big Gulp  This thread currently has 1,348 views. |
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
Libertarian4life
May 31, 2012, 5:58pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
NYC soda ban another blow for drink makers

Associated Press

NEW YORK — Is the Big Gulp to blame for obesity in the Big Apple? New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg thinks so.

But Bloomberg's proposal Thursday that the city prohibit restaurants, delis and movie theaters from serving large cups of sodas and other sugary drinks is a bitter twist for companies that make beverages like Coke, Dr Pepper and Pepsi. The ban, which would be the first of its kind in the nation, comes at a time when soda consumption has been declining.

The industry has struggled in recent years as more health-conscious Americans have shifted away from sugary sodas toward bottled water and sports drinks like Gatorade. That's led to a 20 percent reduction in the calories consumed per capita through carbonated beverages over the last decade, according to the industry tracker Beverage Digest. Under Bloomberg's proposed ban, soda consumption could slip further.

The ban would impose a 16-ounce limit on any sugary bottled or fountain drinks that contain more than 25 calories per 8 ounces. It would not affect diet soda and any drink that is at least 70 percent juice, or half milk or milk substitute, would be exempt. The proposal requires the approval of the city's Board of Health — considered likely because its members are all appointed by Bloomberg.

It's difficult to estimate the potential financial impact of the proposed ban because there's no breakdown of what percentage of drinks sold are over the proposed the size limit or how consumers and retailers would adjust if the ban were in place.

But Mark Kalinowski, an analyst with Janney Capital Markets who covers companies including McDonald's, said that sodas carry high margins for fast-food companies. Any successful effort by the government to ban large drinks, he said, would be bad for the industry.

And Kalinowski predicts an uproar if the proposal passes.

"Folks who want to buy Big Gulps and Frappuccinos, a lot of those customers, you're only going to be able to take it away from them by prying it out of their cold, dead hands," he said. "What are you going to do? Post a guard making sure that no patrons order no more than two or more beverages? Maybe the mayor can outlaw all soft drinks and outlaw all fun while he's at it."

City officials said some calorie-heavy drinks such as Starbucks Frappuccinos would probably be exempted because of their dairy content, while Slurpees and Big Gulp drinks at 7-Eleven wouldn't be affected because the convenience stores are regulated as groceries.

PepsiCo Inc., the nation's second largest soda maker, declined to comment on the proposal, referring questions to the New York City Beverage Association. But Coca-Cola Co., the largest U.S. soda maker, on Thursday blasted the move.

"The people of New York City are much smarter than the New York City Health Department believes," the Atlanta-based company said in a statement. "New Yorkers expect and deserve better than this. They can make their own choices about the beverages they purchase. We hope New Yorkers loudly voice their disapproval about this arbitrary mandate."

This certainly is not the first time the industry has had to defend itself from those blaming sodas for America's expanding waistline.

In announcing the proposal, Bloomberg's office said the single largest driver of rising obesity rates is sugary drinks, which have grown in size over the years. The mayor's office noted that the size of a large drink at fast food chains has doubled to 64 ounces. The Center for Science in the Public Interest said sugary soft drinks are "nutritionally worthless products" in applauding the proposal.

Meanwhile, the industry has scrambled in recent years to win back consumers — and fight off critics — by offering choices that address growing health concerns:

— Pepsi earlier this year introduced its Pepsi Next, which has about half the calories of regular sodas (or 60 calories, versus 140). The Purchase, N.Y.-based company says the early reports on sales are positive.

— Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc. last year rolled out its "Dr Pepper Ten," which has just 10 calories. Based on the initial success, the company is testing the 10-calorie formula with other drinks including Sunkist and Canada Dry.

— Coca-Cola is set to start testing its mid-calorie versions of its Fanta and Sprite in select cities in the coming weeks. In the past few years, the company has also offered its drinks in a variety of smaller sizes. For example, the company in 2009 introduced a 7.5-ounce "mini-can."

As of the end of last year, the company also had met is goals of printing the total caloric content on the front of its beverages, rather than making consumers do the math with the serving sizes on nutrition panels.

___
Logged
Private Message
GrahamBonnet
May 31, 2012, 6:09pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
Let me guess: You as a libertarian support this?


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 16
Libertarian4life
May 31, 2012, 8:48pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from GrahamBonnet
Let me guess: You as a libertarian support this?


No.

I don't support government restrictions of almost any kind.

All this will do is force all the bottling plants to retool the entire industry back to the 1980's versions.

This type of government behavior will undoubtedly lead to purchase restrictions on your grocery purchases.

The cashier will have to notify you if you exceed your sugar, fat or carbohydrate allowances on your food account.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 16
Libertarian4life
May 31, 2012, 8:50pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from GrahamBonnet
Let me guess: You as a libertarian support this?



No, but I do support the right to choose to be fat.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 16
Tommy
May 31, 2012, 9:15pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
It's gonna generate more litter.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 16
GrahamBonnet
June 1, 2012, 5:41am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
It is very green- order TWO 16 ounce drinks instead of a large 32 ounce. I heard blowberg say this himself on the radio


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 16
CICERO
June 1, 2012, 6:17am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Bloomberg for VP!!!  Mitt and Mike 2012


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 16
littlesal
June 1, 2012, 6:46am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
842
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+4 / -2
Time Online
232 days 18 hours 19 minutes
uhhhhhhhh


free refills?????????????????????????
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 16
Libertarian4life
June 1, 2012, 7:40am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from littlesal
uhhhhhhhh


free refills?????????????????????????



The slippery slope continues.

Ban the free refills...ban the all you can eat...

Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 16
Libertarian4life
June 1, 2012, 7:44am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from GrahamBonnet
It is very green- order TWO 16 ounce drinks instead of a large 32 ounce. I heard blowberg say this himself on the radio



Finally, homeless bottle collectors get a cost of living increase.

Now 200 bottles will fit into a shopping cart instead of150. That's $10 per cart full when it used to be $7.50.

Let the celebrating begin.

I didn't realize all the positive aspects of this.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 16
alias
June 1, 2012, 7:45am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from Libertarian4life



The slippery slope continues.

Ban the free refills...ban the all you can eat...



oh, ronnie would have no part of that...................every see him attack a plate of perogies???




Logged
E-mail Reply: 10 - 16
Patches
June 1, 2012, 8:11am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
4,839
Reputation
63.16%
Reputation Score
+12 / -7
Time Online
40 days 11 hours 18 minutes



2 sodas instead of one.....yah right....look at the second one and you won't drink it......

what a cuss....what about the beer???....malts.   ice cream cones.....double dipped....triple dipped...

.....some are obese because they choose to be......now...here's the deal..

now they will have rehab for  the obese ...

but for gosh sakes.....will someone tell these people not to wear SPANDEX ///

that's what Mikey should support......
Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 16
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
June 1, 2012, 10:51am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
Bloomberg is the biggest a** to occupy public office.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 16
Tommy
June 1, 2012, 10:56am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Bloomberg is the biggest a** to occupy public office.


That's because he drank too much soda.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 16
Glryinthhighest
June 1, 2012, 3:02pm Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
204
Reputation
0.00%
Reputation Score
+0 / -12
Time Online
2 days 15 hours 15 minutes
I am certain a sensible Democrat will be taking the seat in the VERY near future.


"Return the Democratic Party to it's Pro-Life roots and remove control of it from the Neo-Liberals!


I am as awesome as a man can be, especially when I am passionate about something.

             ~ Glryinthhighest
Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 16
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Goodbye Slurpees, Goodbye Big Gulp

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread