Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Sch'dy's Rental Inspection Policy
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Sch'dy's Rental Inspection Policy Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 337 Guests

Sch'dy's Rental Inspection Policy  This thread currently has 1,098 views. |
2 Pages « 1 2 Recommend Thread
TakingItBack
March 13, 2012, 1:16pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,579
Reputation
80.00%
Reputation Score
+8 / -2
Time Online
71 days 7 hours 28 minutes
Quoted from Ididntdoit
From what I understand, the inspections for city vs Sec. 8 (SMHA)  are very similar. One difference is the inspection for Sec. 8 is done every year whether or not there is a change in tenancy. So, if a tenant lives in the same place for a decade, the inspection is done yearly. For the city, currently, the inspection only occurs at a change of tenancy. Or should occur, from what I read in the arrticle, that is hardly the case.


The inspections are similiar but the difference being that Section 8 is just inspecting for the safety of the tenant.  There isnt a charge for the inspection and they also work with you since they want to house the "needy" person.  The city on the other hand is also looking for other things to money grab.  


Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid - John Wayne


TIP TO NEW VISITORS TO THIS FORUM - To improve your blogging pleasure it is recommended to ignore (Through editing your prefere) the posts of the following bloggers - DemocraticVoiceofReason, Scotsgod08 and Smoking Bananas.  They continually go off topic, do not provide facts and make irrational remarks. If you do not believe me, this can be proven by their reputation scores or by a sampling of their posts.  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 15 - 15
2 Pages « 1 2 Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Sch'dy's Rental Inspection Policy

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread