It would probably be a good start of cops did not do illegal drugs. That would make for a nice place to start in negotiations, wouldn't you agree? Some of them get elevated quite high, even to this day. Most of them don't- but having even ONE soils the whole bunch.
"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Yeah, a couple of names come to mind. They were convicted, I believe. Or do you normally make it a habit to be so woefully uninformed as to not have heard of Kazmarek and Curtis. Does the name Hamilton ring a bell as to his convictions on Federal charges?
Since you actually have trouble remembering or knowing facts I will (unlike you) cite sources and quote. Emphasis added if you know what that means, seeing as you are so woefully out of touch with facts and recent history: http://openjurist.org/334/f3d/170/united-states-v-hamilton
Quoted Text
Defendants Michael Hamilton and Nicola Messere, former officers in the Schenectady, New York Police Department, appeal from judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York following a jury trial before David N. Hurd, Judge, convicting them of narcotics-related offenses. Hamilton was convicted on one count of aiding and abetting the maintenance of a residence for the purposes of distributing and using controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 856(a)(1) and (b) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and one count of using a cellular telephone to facilitate such maintenance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 843(b) and (d)(1); he was sentenced principally to 54 months' imprisonment, to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. Messere was convicted on one count of distributing and possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base (crack), in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C); he was sentenced principally to 27 months' imprisonment, to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. On appeal, defendants contend primarily that the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions. Alternatively, they contend that the district court should have granted them a new trial on various grounds, including prejudicial spillover of evidence introduced in support of a count on which they were acquitted, alleged errors in the admission of evidence, and the government's alleged subornation of perjury and nondisclosure of exculpatory evidence. Hamilton also challenges his sentence. Finding no merit in any of defendants' contentions, we affirm.
I know your little copservative party handbook that Gardner and Quaile wrote for you contains the words "If you have proof of that you should report it" when facts about various wrong doings are presented, but really when it all boils down- you shouldn't trust far-left socialists who back cop-killers such as Mumia Abu-Jamal and oppose capital punishment dictate your life. I know that is what the "young breed" is doing, but really, when it all comes down your man Obama and his libs aren't helping you men in uniform.
"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
youre kidding right. you bring up these old and well publicized cases as if theyvwere avrevealation
Well publicized? One was the CHIEF!! That's like the Pope getting caught molesting a young boy and saying there is not a child molestation problem in the Catholic Church.
thatvwould make anyone think it was presently going on
And perhaps it isn't. But then again perhaps it is. There are cell phones with cameras now.
There are drug dealers A-L-L O-V-E-R Schenectady! And yet they still 'deal'. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Are cops drug tested?
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
There are drug dealers in Scheneectady and they are arrested wuite a bit, but, there is a demand issue - you are never really going to eradicate the drug market - what the police can do is prevent the market from negatively impacting people who want no part of that market (e.g., open air dealing, gun violence associated with the drug trade).
police arerandomly drug tested, can be tested for cause.
City workers driving around with plows on? Interesting.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid - John Wayne
TIP TO NEW VISITORS TO THIS FORUM - To improve your blogging pleasure it is recommended to ignore (Through editing your prefere) the posts of the following bloggers - DemocraticVoiceofReason, Scotsgod08 and Smoking Bananas. They continually go off topic, do not provide facts and make irrational remarks. If you do not believe me, this can be proven by their reputation scores or by a sampling of their posts.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid - John Wayne
TIP TO NEW VISITORS TO THIS FORUM - To improve your blogging pleasure it is recommended to ignore (Through editing your prefere) the posts of the following bloggers - DemocraticVoiceofReason, Scotsgod08 and Smoking Bananas. They continually go off topic, do not provide facts and make irrational remarks. If you do not believe me, this can be proven by their reputation scores or by a sampling of their posts.
This series of responses from visitor reminds me of his bosom pals at the ACLU or the American Communist Party (and we DO know what your political views are since you sleep skin to skin with the democraps very closely in a twin bed) who make the argument that those arrested are "first time offenders" when in reality knows they have committed many, many offenses before finally getting caught and the vast majority of then never get caught for their crimes which tells me that even at the highest levels of these departments drug crimes are rampant. However, like the ACLU and the Communist Party these local copserv-a-crats think the public is dumb, naive and woefully uninformed as to the realities. toke toke toke down by the riverside. People know more and of course- I am only going on the say-so of other cops. So either reports are true, or many cops are liars. Take you pick. Either way in a court of law it is heresay. However, when numerous officers report things to me in disgust of the breathren, I don't expect that are also reporting it to the DA where it would also be covered up. The next federal probe may find interesting things. Who knows?
NO ONE thought the above about the cops in the report was true. Until it was proven in court. Now I have more of an open mind as to what the so-called "law" is capable of, which I did not 20 years ago when I defended the officers to the end at every chance. Naively, of course.
"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
