Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Warren Buffett To Republicans...
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Warren Buffett To Republicans... Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 169 Guests

Warren Buffett To Republicans...  This thread currently has 2,612 views. |
4 Pages « 1 2 3 4 » Recommend Thread
55tbird
January 12, 2012, 3:11pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,211
Reputation
91.67%
Reputation Score
+11 / -1
Time Online
209 days 13 hours 13 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


OK... One more case of "The Big Conspiracy" that infests this board.  When it's unexplained... when the obvious
doesn't fit the agenda... when all else fails...
Blame "The Big Conspiracy"!


LOL...first time I heard that, Box. I have no idea what it has to do with this thread.
Is it anything like Hillary's "vast right wing conspiracy"?


"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 15 - 59
Box A Rox
January 12, 2012, 3:36pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from 55tbird


LOL...first time I heard that, Box. I have no idea what it has to do with this thread.
Is it anything like Hillary's "vast right wing conspiracy"?


It's similar... it's this board's Vast Universal Conspiracy...
~ It's usually presented when Bumble, Shadow or even Cicero have run out of logical reasons for an event...
~ The board will become eerily quiet... just the sound of Buddhist chants in the background...
~ Shadow will say something like... "it doesn't matter if your Republican or Democrat... they are all the same"
~ Bumble will softly toll a gong, as he proclaims  another "board fact" (not an actual fact, but an invented one,
that is accepted as if it were fact, even though everyone knows it's bogus.  Kind of a "save face" fact)
~ Cicero, by this time is all warmed up and ready for (yet another) description of some lame Al Qaeda terrorist,
(usually some where in Yemen) as an armed predator drone flies up his butt. (Cic will be sweating by the time
he's finished the story and will need to stop for some water before he can continue!)

When a fact is incontinent... Mention the "Big Conspiracy"!
When a Right Wing myth is proven to be false... call on the "Big Conspiracy"!
When a Conservative poster is caught actually believing FoxSnooze and everyone is laughing... Blame the
"Big Conspiracy"!
When a Right Wing Conservative Politician is caught in the men's room with yet another gay staffer...
cite the the "Big Conspiracy"!

The "Big Conspiracy"!   Not true, not fiction, not visible or  written down in any text...
but they all know it's absolutely true!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 16 - 59
BuckStrider
January 12, 2012, 3:56pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Buffet, one of the richest men in the world, stated the fact that he pays less than any one working in his office...
Buffet pays 17%, his office staff pays as much as 30%.

The tax system is slanted in favor of the richest Americans, and puts the working men and women of this
country paying a higher rate... in effect... they are paying their taxes, plus Buffets tax as well.

If you think that this system is fair... then do nothing.  Pay your taxes, plus add some more to make up for the
rich underpaying their tax.

Buffet (and McConnell) are paying less than their fair share and Buffet wants the system changed to reflect
this unfair practice.
This issue isn't about Warren paying more... it's about all Americans paying their fair share.




Meanwhile, back in reality....

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/o.....oq9yjJ#ixzz1WRoIlYSf

Thanks for playing, have a nice day





"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 17 - 59
senders
January 12, 2012, 5:01pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
someone please define FAIR.....................

OR equitable........


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 18 - 59
Admin
January 26, 2012, 6:03am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
Warren Buffett's Secretary Likely Makes Between $200,000 And $500,000/Year

Bosanek’s prominent role in Obama’s “fairness” campaign piqued my curiosity, and I imagine the curiosity of others. How much does her boss pay this downtrodden woman? So far, no one has volunteered this information.

We can get an approximate answer by consulting IRS data on tax rates by adjusted gross income, which would approximate her salary, assuming she does not have significant dividend, interest or capital-gains income (like her boss). I assume Buffet keeps her too busy for her to hold a second job. I also do not know if she is married and filing jointly. If so, it is deceptive for Obama to use her as an example. The higher rate may be due to her husband’s income.  So I assume the tax rate Obama refers to is from her own earnings.

Insofar as Buffet (like Mitt Romney) earns income primarily from capital gains, which are taxed at 15 percent (and according to Obama need to be raised for reasons of fairness), we need to determine how much income a taxpayer like Bosanek must earn in order to pay an average tax rate above fifteen percent. This is easy to do.

The IRS publishes detailed tax tables by income level. The latest results are for 2009. They show that taxpayers earning an adjusted gross income between $100,000 and $200,000 pay an average rate of twelve percent. This is below Buffet’s rate; so she must earn more than that. Taxpayers earning adjusted gross incomes of $200,000 to $500,000, pay an average tax rate of nineteen percent. Therefore Buffet must pay Debbie Bosanke a salary above two hundred thousand.

We must wait for further details to learn how much more than $200,000 she earns. The tax tables tell us about average ranges. For all we know she earns closer to a half million each year, but that is pure speculation..........................>>>>......................>>>>.........................http://www.forbes.com/sites/pa.....0000-and-500000year/
Logged
Private Message Reply: 19 - 59
CICERO
January 26, 2012, 8:35am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Awwww....Poor, Poor, Poor, Warren Buffett secretary.  I can't believe she hasn't quit working at such a slave wage.  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 20 - 59
CICERO
January 26, 2012, 8:38am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted Text
Despite Unfair Tax Burden, Warren Buffett's Secretary Was Just Able To Buy A Second Home

Despite a heavy tax burden, Warren Buffett’s secretary last year was able to purchase a second home in Arizona, a residence complete with a swimming pool and a “professional PGA putting green,” according to real estate records.

Debra Bosanek, 55, and her husband Gerald bought the 2100-square-foot home in Surprise, a city outside Phoenix. The Bosaneks paid $144,000 for the four-bedroom, two-and-a-half bath property (the purchase was financed, in part, by a $115,200 mortgage).

The principal Bosanek residence is in Bellevue, Nebraska, several miles from Buffett’s corporate headquarters in Omaha. The couple’s 2568-square-foot home, built in 2000, also has four bedrooms and two-and-a-half baths. But the modest property, which Sarpy County assessors last year valued at $217,716, offers no outdoor amenities for swimmers or golfers.

Bosanek, who last night attended the State of the Union speech, has become the face of President Barack Obama’s so-called Buffett Rule, which contends that the secretary of a wealthy individual should not pay a higher tax rate than their boss.


http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/warren-buffett-secretary-homes-654812


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 21 - 59
GrahamBonnet
January 26, 2012, 10:07am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
You can get a lot of house for the money in AZ now. Plus the property taxes on that house will be about 800 bucks. In Schenectady that would equate to $8000. Pretty fair and equitable, isn't it?


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 22 - 59
GrahamBonnet
January 26, 2012, 10:13am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
The bottom line is that if these folks spent their money on mutual funds then their tax rate would be lower. Now, when they SELL either of these two homes at a magnificent profit ( I am expecting both homes they have will eventually sell for double or triple the assessed value or purchase price they paid) someday, that money will show up on their return WITH NO TAX OWED AT ALL!!!! (HORRRRRRIBLE AND UNFAIR!!!) If they sell both in one year and have high incomes then you can bet that their Million+ income will be taxed that year at a VERY LOW rate! Possible 4 or 5% (OMG MAKE A NEW LAW CALLED THE DEBBIE LAW)

THEN WHAT!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Ahhh, the vagaries of the tax code. No two returns are alike, yet because of one guy or a handful (anyone know the story behind the ATM) EVERYONE'S TAXES GO UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 23 - 59
senders
January 26, 2012, 3:59pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
he must think all secretaries make that as a salary....WTF does he even have business talking about what the rest of us do....SHAME ON HIM.....really really really shame on Buffet and Buddies.......


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 24 - 59
Admin
February 11, 2012, 8:33am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
BUFFETT’S BANK OF AMERICA
WARREN BUFFETT’S NET WORTH JUMPS $154M THANKS TO MORTGAGE SETTLEMENT

BY: Patrick Howley - February 10, 2012 12:50 pm

Warren Buffett’s stake in Bank of America Corp. increased in value by $154 million after President Obama and the U.S. Justice Department announced a $25 billion foreclosure abuse settlement with the five largest U.S. banks Thursday, records show.

Buffett invested $5 billion in Bank of America (BofA) on Aug. 25, 2011. As part of his investment deal, Buffett gained warrants that allow him to buy 700 million shares of Bank of America stock at a strike price of $7.14 a share. However, on Dec. 19, 2011, it was reported that Buffett was $1.5 billion underwater on his stock warrants, with shares of BofA stock trading at $4.94. But on Thursday, after President Obama personally announced the details of the settlement, BofA stock closed at $8.13 a share. The stock opened Friday morning at $8.31 and reached as high as $8.35 a share.

If Buffett had exercised his warrants Friday morning, he would have made $847 million. $154 million of that profit would have been related to the foreclosure deal..........................>>>>.....................>>>>....................................................http://freebeacon.com/warren-buffetts-net-worth-jumps-154m-thanks-to-mortgage-settlement/
Logged
Private Message Reply: 25 - 59
Shadow
February 11, 2012, 8:55am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
It's good to be connected to the Chicago thugs.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 26 - 59
bumblethru
February 11, 2012, 12:36pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Buffett =  hypocrite!

He should have kept his mouth shut cause now he has egg all over his lying face!!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 27 - 59
Box A Rox
March 2, 2012, 1:53pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
"We're going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that have allowed some of the truly wealthy
to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in
practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was
paying 10 percent of his salary, and that's crazy. It's time we stopped it."


That was the president, making the case for why our tax code—riddled with unfair breaks, loopholes,
and subsidies that disproportionately benefit the wealthy—requires fundamental reform that ensures
the wealthy pay their fair share."

But it wasn’t President Barack Obama. It was President Ronald Reagan. In 1985.




The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 28 - 59
senders
March 2, 2012, 3:01pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
yes it was.....and guess what.....there have been BOTH DEMS and REPS in the whitehouse since who like the loopholes.....and left them there....


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 29 - 59
4 Pages « 1 2 3 4 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread