|
|
| MobileTerminal |
|
Guest User |
Quoted Text
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) on Tuesday introduced legislation that would allow federal block grants that states now use to subsidize child-care services to also allow for the purchase of diapers and "diapering supplies."
The bill, S. 1778, would amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to allow diapers and related supplies to be bought with grant money provided to states. Under current law, the money is meant to subsidize child-care services to parents who are entering the labor force or are in job training and education programs. It also helps subsidize child-care services for certain eligible families.
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/191371-senate-dem-seeks-federal-funding-for-diapers |
|
 Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
| MobileTerminal |
|
Guest User |
I know, now they'll accuse Rep's of being "anti-baby" ... different, of course, from the pro-abortion democrooks. |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
 Madam X |
| November 3, 2011, 11:24am |
|
Hero Member  Posts
3,190
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+8 / -4
Time Online
26 days 9 hours 21 minutes
|
Is this the program under which that Albany legislator's husband got paid for babysitting their grandchildren?
What I don't like about these programs is that they generally end up allowing the not-so-needy to be able to purchase more "extras" with the money they save by not having to pay for items for their own children. |
|
|
|
|
|
| GravelGertie |
| November 3, 2011, 12:19pm |
|
Guest User |
This is an appropriate thread for the Nattering Nayboobs of Negativity to be commenting on since they all whine like babies when their diapers are full.......Is the program a good one? Yes, by all means --- do anything we can to help children get a good start in life and their health is indeed important --- No matter WHAT the Nayboobs and Fu{ktards Squad says...... |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| BuckStrider |
|
 Hero Member Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
|
Quoted from 1630
This is an appropriate thread for the Nattering Nayboobs of Negativity to be commenting on since they all whine like babies when their diapers are full.......Is the program a good one? Yes, by all means --- do anything we can to help children get a good start in life and their health is indeed important --- No matter WHAT the Nayboobs and Fu{ktards Squad says......
My God, your posting is as terrible as that Schenectady gin mill that shares your name |
|  "Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women' |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| alias |
|
Guest User |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
| bumblethru |
|
Hero Member Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
|
How about these folks buy 'cloth' diapers? Ya know...........pay once.............wash...............reuse!!! DUH! |
| When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche “How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| alias |
|
Guest User |
How about these folks buy 'cloth' diapers? Ya know...........pay once.............wash...............reuse!!! DUH!
The disposable society we created won't allow it.......wash???....reuse???...........most have forgotten or are too lazy to do it.....  |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| Shadow |
|
Hero Member Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
|
I think that it's unconstitutional to ask them to do any work like wash diapers. |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| GravelGertie |
|
Guest User |
Why are poor people not entitled to the same niceties as every one else......Only NNN fu{ktards hate babies.. |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| MobileTerminal |
|
Guest User |
Why can't the poor people keep their pants pulled up and use the common sense God gave them .... if you can't afford it, you do without, stop looking for handouts. |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
| senders |
|
Hero Member Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
|
Quoted from 1630
Why are poor people not entitled to the same niceties as every one else......Only NNN fu{ktards hate babies..
just other people's babies..... I'm not paying for your child to piss and crap into a receptacle..... WIC is sexist...... |
| ...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
| bumblethru |
|
Hero Member Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
|
|
| When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche “How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| A Better Rotterdam |
|
 Hero Member Posts
903
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+6 / -4
Time Online
38 days 7 hours 17 minutes
|
It seems that the last few generations have lost the ideal of personal responsibility. If you are broke you shouldn' t have another kid, it's bad for you, the kid and society as a whole. Not sure how we as a people can reverse this way of thinking. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mr. Majestyk |
| November 3, 2011, 11:21pm |
|
Sr. Member  Posts
400
Reputation
80.00%
Reputation Score
+4 / -1
Time Online
13 days 22 hours 45 minutes
|
Is this the program under which that Albany legislator's husband got paid for babysitting their grandchildren?
What I don't like about these programs is that they generally end up allowing the not-so-needy to be able to purchase more "extras" with the money they save by not having to pay for items for their own children.
Guess all that extra $$$$$ falls under the heading of stimulating the economy.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
