Global Warming skeptic, Richard Muller, was the one remaining hold out who advanced the Conservative view that Global warming is not valid science. He reviewed the data, studied all the existing reports, then conducted his own study, that agreed totally with the existing view.
With this overwhelming evidence, he changed his mind to now agree with the rest of the legitimate scientific community.
Who do you choose???
1. One view is the overwhelming scientific evidence and opinion of the entire scientific body
VS
2. The guess and personal opinion of Senders and Cicero... who have done no study, have no expertise in the field, and who's views are driven solely by their political agenda.
Not much of a choice huh?