She apparently appears to be the liberal socialist's 'anti-free speech cop'....aka.....'the unplugger'!!!
Correction there BT...'the attempted unplugger'
Even if she hadn't been ordered to stop she wouldn't have been able to figure out how to disconnect the microphone...it's not a standard 'plug'...you have to unscrew the attachment before pulling out the jack.
That DEM moron should immediately be terminated at TH. Who the hell is she to try to unplug a microphone during public comments? This is one party rule in action. No dissent can be tolerated as the town rapidly moves up the highest taxed list. Number 20 with a bullet. Working together works! Soon Rotterdam will be in second only to that other DEM cesspool.
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Re May 24 article, “Del Gallo to close part of offi ce amid flap”: Do I understand this correctly? Mr. [Supervisor Frank] Del Gallo was in favor of paying a (now-former) full-time town employee a full-time salary for approximately half-time hours? I have to wonder if Mr. Del Gallo would have even considered this had it been an employee of his pool business. My guess would be that he would not. So why would he think it acceptable to Rotterdam taxpayers? Let’s get real!
It was just another 'all time low' for rotterdam!! A resident trying to stifle free speech by attempting to tamper with public property!! Don't forget to vote democon AGAIN rotterdamins!!!
Every day there is another new low from these all DEM morons. Stop sharpening your pitchfork and oiling your torches. WC, Bob God and FDG should all resign in disgrace. They make no sense and have complete contempt for the oppressed taxpayers. Clean out the TH barn!
FDG is a double talking hypocrite....a liar, as I said.
He hires a secretary in a position he vowed to eliminate at a salary he would never pay for a comparable position at his own business, out of his own pocket.
And while I'm sure he would also conveniently deny this now...I addressed him directly with a similar parallel with regard to REMS before he stiffed the Town with their contract...
I asked him if he found out one of his employees was stealling money from his business, would he hire them again?? Of course he immediately said no...I then told him that to contract with REMS would be no different...only the thieves and the source of the stolen money would be different...but the concepts are identical. In other words, by his logic, it's ok for REMS to steal money from the Town and be rewarded for that theft with a contract that would give them exclusive access to the same source of stolen cash...but not ok to give his own employee the same reward for stealing from HIM. We can probably assume that the REMS audit he vowed and then promptly abandoned would have been carried out in the interest of HIS business.
I have also since told him that based on his own actions and statements in the matter of REMS, Town residents should now be able to go out and sell pools to anyone they wish and keep all of the money...but he will have to install the pools at his own expense. Then when he finds out about the scheme and wants to know how much those residents collected and retained for a product and service they did not provide, they can just tell him they don't know and "it doesn't matter"....forget an audit...just give them a contract with your company, FDG.
at the agenda meeting on 5/22/2011, the Supervisor, when questioned about the closing of his office and the rate of pay for his secretary said,
"I pay people what they are worth", and stated he had hired "thousands" of employees over the years.
Then the Supervisor had the "round or egg-shaped objects" to question council member Matt Martin what he was worth.
The underlying issue is, there is a secretary on the town payroll making $50,000ish per year.
So what you are trying to say is balls, nuts, plums, rocks, bollocks, nads, gonads, sack (collective), nuggets, Cracker Jacks, stones, kerbangers, marbles, tenders, cullions, bells, pelotas, nutsack, bollocks, family jewels, gems, cojones, junk, package, manjigglies, Man tonsils, Knackers, Cods, love spuds, hanging brain, ornaments, peaches, in-betweens, etc. or in FDG's case "raisins"
at the agenda meeting on 5/22/2011, the Supervisor, when questioned about the closing of his office and the rate of pay for his secretary said,"I pay people what they are worth", and stated he had hired "thousands" of employees over the years.
Really FDG, then why such the "collossal" turnover in employees?