YOU ARE ALL WRONG. FDG IS DONE AND WILL NEVER MAKE A POLITICAL OFFICE EVER AGAIN. IT WAS BM THAT PUT HIM IN AS SUPERVISOR AND BM LOST THE ELECTION FOR ST bECAUSE ST WOULD HAVE STILL BEEN THERE AS SUPERVISOR AND HE WOULD HAVE NEVER TREATED ANY EMPLOYEE LIKE FDG TREATS ALL HIS EMPLOYEES. EXCEPT TL,AF,JL,MZ,DM AND THE REST OF THE EMPLOYESS THAT BOW DOWN TO FDG BUT DO NOT DO THEIR JOB FOR THE TAX PAYERS OF THIS TOWN. HB WILL BE THE NEXT SUPERVISOR AND THE RESIDENTS ARE COUNTING THE DAYS TILL 1/1/2012.
JD DOESN'T GET IT WITH ALL HIS PREVIOUS FBI INVESTIGATIONS, $750k FROM IRENE AND HIS REAL ESTATE DEALINGS, AND DON'T FORGET THE $20K THAT WAS PUT IN AN ENVELOPE $12K JD $8K JC A RESIDENT THAT NEEDS THE MONEY SHOULD BE THE PERSON FOR THE JOB AND YOU DON'T NEED A 4 YEAR DEGREE. MORE TO COME JD SHOULD TAKE HIS NAME OUT, BEFORE THE REAL TRUTH HITS THE GAZETTE AND THE SPOTLIGHT.
MATT MARTIN HAS NEVER BEEN DISRESPECTFUL TO ANYONE IN THE WORLD ANTHONY DZIKAS WHO STATED THAT IN THE EDITORIAL IS FDG FRIEND AND WATCH IT BECAUSE IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH FDG HE STABS YOU IN THE BACK. IT IS FDG WAY OR NO WAY. SOON TO END THE RESIDENTS WILL SPEAK ON ELECTION DAY.
I don't think the long over referendum alone will win any Primary...especially if the only argument is that one publicized their position and another didn't.
The Tommasone administration voted to create the tax district...the rest was left to voters during the next administration...ST et al are the ones who punted to those voters when they were shamed out of the more sly permissive referendum method.
Everybody knows the NNTP candidates voiced their opposition...their name was based on that opposition...but that was two years ago and the NNTP still isn't a Party.
The argument isn't ONLY that nobody publicized their position, it's also the fact that not one elected official that supposedly represents the residents were so out of touch, that they went through with a vote the was defeated 2 to 1. Way to have your finger on the pulse of the residents.
And I agree, the Tommasone administration DID vote to create the tax district, and where did they end up? They’re on the side lines.
Gadfly, we get it, we get it. The NNTP isn't a recognized "Party" based on NYS BOE standards. But...What it is, is a group of like minded people that are sick of the party leadership in both parties and are willing to go forward with or without party support. There are many motivated volunteers willing to pound the pavement and get their candidate on the ballot. The fact the NNTP ISN'T a party but rather an idea is what makes it attractive to MANY of the Town residents.
I would be glad to put my full backing for BM in a primary over a fence jumper who to this day doesn't even want to lower herself to ASK the party committee members of the party she turned her back on for their endorsement. But it was OK- Bobby H gave her orders and she followed them. But her political marriage isnt going well and she wants to come back to the republican bed. Sadly she wants to do it through the back door and she doesn't even need to ask Forgiveness. She thinks that because she is part of the Daggy set that she is above all of us low republicans. So she figures she can come home anytime. Since I am not a cuckhold, I say stay in bed with the democraps/copservatives and keep making love to the Obamites. She will never win a GOP primary.
She didn't have to ask...they asked first....by your definition BM is a fence jumper too...they're just the other way around.
ND takes orders form no one...especially not BH....she has no political marriage...so there is nothing to evaluate....and she doesn't need to be forgiven...she did nothing wrong.
Ask the Dagostinos how their last conversation went with ND...lol.
You are just as conveniently delusional as BM and his followers...and insisting over and over again that ND is anything like you claim won't make it so. Keep throwing the fake mud GB..,it will do BM wonders - lol.
BTW, have you forgiven BM for toppling team Steve???? As I recall, ND never ran a spoiler race.
The argument isn't ONLY that nobody publicized their position, it's also the fact that not one elected official that supposedly represents the residents were so out of touch, that they went through with a vote the was defeated 2 to 1. Way to have your finger on the pulse of the residents.
And I agree, the Tommasone administration DID vote to create the tax district, and where did they end up? They’re on the side lines.
Gadfly, we get it, we get it. The NNTP isn't a recognized "Party" based on NYS BOE standards. But...What it is, is a group of like minded people that are sick of the party leadership in both parties and are willing to go forward with or without party support. There are many motivated volunteers willing to pound the pavement and get their candidate on the ballot. The fact the NNTP ISN'T a party but rather an idea is what makes it attractive to MANY of the Town residents.
The vote never would have been defeated if not for Mohawk's information campaign...which no one would have forseen...and no one could have known how it would have turned out...with or without that campaign...especially when the pro-REMS side always had the larger presence...you would think there WAS no opposition...where was the NNTP gang??? Oh yeah, their anti-tax campaign seemed to end after they lost the election.
BTW, NNTP candidate McGarry supported the vote...he stood at the podium and insisted that the measure should "not be decided by five people"...that it should go to the voters. Where was his "pulse" on the future??
The ST gang is on the sidelines because of the NNTP...and it wasn't just their single message...plenty of other factors were in play...they worked hard and won the hearts of those who voted for them on a number of levels. It may be an attractive idea, but an annual idea in the form of Row Z, regardless of what you call it, will never be enough to win....maybe enough to spoil, at best...but anybody can do that.
So....if they are sick of the Party leadership then they are hypocrites in asking for their support, IMO. Then again, they really don't expect their support...making it all he more questionable...until you figure out that the NNTP expects the GOP to cave to them...but that will never happen.
Run the Roads YOU DO NEED A FOUR YEAR DEGREE IN SOCIAL WORK OR RELATED FIELD TO DO THAT JOB. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOUR SPEAKING ABOUT BECAUSE YOU AHVE NO UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS NEEDED OR COMING DOWN THE PIKE.
..you would think there WAS no opposition...where was the NNTP gang??? Oh yeah, their anti-tax campaign seemed to end after they lost the election.
Where were the rest of the "REAL" parties that were SITTING ON THE TOWN BOARD? The anti tax campaign may have ended after the election, but if you were at Canali's for the fund raiser in JANUARY, the anti tax sentiment is still alive and well, and raring to go.
BTW, NNTP candidate McGarry supported the vote...he stood at the podium and insisted that the measure should "not be decided by five people"...that it should go to the voters. Where was his "pulse" on the future??
Huh??? He was CLEARLY opposed to the new taxing district. He and the rest of the NNTP ran a whole campaign against not just the new tax, but capping taxes. Now you're grasping at straws to lump him in with rest of the political cowards.
So....if they are sick of the Party leadership then they are hypocrites in asking for their support, IMO.
No, it's called taking the lead...If the GOP wants to throw their support behind NNTP candidates, they can...Otherwise the GOP will just be playing the role of spoiler.
OK, if she doesn;t have to apologize to the republican committee for jumping ship and running against them and now wanting to come back then maybe she should apologize to the taxpayers for her "conservative" spending and forcing the taxpayers to buy the GILLETTE HOUSE!
"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Where were the rest of the "REAL" parties that were SITTING ON THE TOWN BOARD? The anti tax campaign may have ended after the election, but if you were at Canali's for the fund raiser in JANUARY, the anti tax sentiment is still alive and well, and raring to go.
Huh??? He was CLEARLY opposed to the new taxing district. He and the rest of the NNTP ran a whole campaign against not just the new tax, but capping taxes. Now you're grasping at straws to lump him in with rest of the political cowards.
No, it's called taking the lead...If the GOP wants to throw their support behind NNTP candidates, they can...Otherwise the GOP will just be playing the role of spoiler.
I never suggested the anti-tax campaign in general ended...or that BM did not support the tax. I SAID...BM told the Board that the tax issue should not have been decided by five people....the real Parties agreed, even if by force...and the vote was held. Why didn't BM campaign against the tax AND the vote...just as you are stating about the Board who held the vote...the ones that should have had a crystal ball to predict the outcome....why didn't BM know whether it would pass or not??? I'm not lumping him in with anyone else...he didn't oppose the vote either...he encouraged it...as opposed to those "five people" deciding for the rest.
The GOP is taking the lead...because they are a Party...and they have no obligation to throw their support around a non-Party candidate...the NNTP is the one who will have to accept their choices...not the other way around...but the NNTP (which isn't a Party) has made it clear that if the GOP does not let them dictate the GOP agenda, they will go through with the NNTP line, which is the real spoiler, and is not a Party. I know for a fact that BM long ago told the real Party that if he didn't get their nod he would just file an NNTP petition with the guarantee that it would spoil their choice, if it isn't him.
The NNTP needs to get over themselves and realize that they do not have the leverage over the major Parties that they think they do.
OK, if she doesn;t have to apologize to the republican committee for jumping ship and running against them and now wanting to come back then maybe she should apologize to the taxpayers for her "conservative" spending and forcing the taxpayers to buy the GILLETTE HOUSE!
Desperation sucks, doesn't it GB???? Now you're all the way back to the Gillette House??? LOL
Tell you what....ask BM to apologize for running against the GOP candidates and costing them their election...since they knew all along that they would spoil GOP candidates...and maybe ND will apoligize for beating you - lol.
Thanks so much GB!!! Did you find the articles on your spineless attempt to give the Metrokratz Cartel a "compromise" of another $10 million while they were under audit??? ROTFLMAO
"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Why didn't BM campaign against the tax AND the vote....
Were you sleeping through the 2009 campaign? Ya know those No New Taxes signs on peoples lawns, the radio interviews. How much clearer could BM and the rest have made their positions known on the taxing district? Now being a board member like ND is on lthe other hand, with Justin Mason sitting directly in front of her, she had plenty of FREE opportunities to voice her opposition to the district. BUT...She didn't. In fact, she voted YES to create the taxing district.
Logged
