Quoted from Box A Rox

Tbird.
Please pay attention, and try to keep up.

1. I never accused the Oathkeepers of crimes... that was another posters diversion.  So I had NOTHING TO BACK UP! DuHHH
2. What LIE about the Oathkeepers?
3. I didn't bring up the Black Panthers... Cicero did.  My posts about the Black Panthers was in response to his post. See#12.

Pay attention Tbird, or you'll just embarrass yourself again!

"The OathKeepers who have committed known crimes have been prosecuted... just like the Black Panthers who have committed crimes.  Both groups have of paramilitary anti government segment."

The above is YOUR quote.. and you're telling me that you never said the OathKeepers committed crimes?..
Is English your second language?

Post #14:
Box, have the Oathkeepers committed any crimes yet?
Reply:
"The OathKeepers who have committed known crimes have been prosecuted... just like the Black Panthers who have committed crimes.

I would exclude the OathKeepers because of their radical agenda, not because they may or may not be criminals.  

(It was not my contention that they should be excluded because they have committed a crime... but excluded because of their FBI profile as a dangerous group.)

A totally separate issue:
According to the affidavit, the police in Rochester, where the couple used to live, "report a lengthy history of domestic violence" between Irish and Taylor. The affidavit also states that Taylor has reported being beaten and choked by Irish on several occasions and that the couple had sought restraining orders against each other in the past. A court petition accompanying the affidavit concluded that the newborn faced "imminent danger" if left in her parents' care.
http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/219975/oath-keepers-plans-rally

Quoted from Box A Rox

Post #14:

A totally separate issue:
According to the affidavit, the police in Rochester, where the couple used to live, "report a lengthy history of domestic violence" between Irish and Taylor. The affidavit also states that Taylor has reported being beaten and choked by Irish on several occasions and that the couple had sought restraining orders against each other in the past. A court petition accompanying the affidavit concluded that the newborn faced "imminent danger" if left in her parents' care.
http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/219975/oath-keepers-plans-rally

The baby was returned to the couple on October 15, 2010. No explanation as to why.
Its another example of the government overstepping when it needs to STAY OUT of peoples personal lives.
Just like last year when the Texas dept of Social Services seized children from a religious sect illegally ... until a judge ordered the return of them to their mothers.

who gives a turd?