Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Schenectady's Proposed "Curb Tax"
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Schenectady's Proposed "Curb Tax" Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 215 Guests

Schenectady's Proposed "Curb Tax"  This thread currently has 4,258 views. |
9 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Recommend Thread
Admin
October 6, 2010, 5:41am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
Schenectady nonprofits say 'curb fee' to hurt
By Lauren Stanforth Staff Writer
Published: 12:00 a.m., Wednesday, October 6, 2010

SCHENECTADY -- For Michael Saccocio, executive director of the City Mission of Schenectady, news that the city might assess a fee next year to his nonprofit organization makes him look out his window and sigh.

The proposed "curb fee" would be based on a property's frontage with city streets. And the City Mission, which shelters and feeds about 100 people a day, takes up three sides of a square block in Hamilton Hill.

"These are really hard times, everyone is being stretched farther than they've ever been before and we respect where the mayor is coming from," Saccocio said.

Mayor Brian U. Stratton's proposal would charge all property owners a fee for road services to help close a $6 million budget gap. However, "when you hear it's based on per-foot," he said, "we get anxious."

Many not-for-profits expressed the same sentiment Tuesday, a day after Stratton unveiled his 2011 spending plan. It also calls for the closure of a fire station and cuts to pools and parks. Nonprofits are concerned about how to pay for such a fee, but not surprised more money is being asked of them.

Ed August, executive director of Better Neighborhoods Inc., an affordable housing provider, said he already reduced his office hours after the state cut its aid by $34,000.

"Is it going to hurt me? Yes," August said about the proposed curb fee. "It's a tax, that's what it is."

The curb fee is meant to not only spread the property tax burden among residential and commercial owners, but also to tax-exempt not-for-profits such as churches, parochial schools and medical facilities. For Stratton, it's an opportunity to reduce the proposed property tax hike next year from 8.8 percent to 4 percent by raising another $1.4 million in revenue. City Council President Gary McCarthy has said he supports the move -- depending on what the fees will be. City Council must approve the proposed $76.9 million budget by Nov. 1.................>>>>...................>>>>........................http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Schenectady-nonprofits-say-curb-fee-to-hurt-689182.php
Logged
Private Message
Shadow
October 6, 2010, 6:35am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
The city council never met a tax they didn't like.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 134
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
October 7, 2010, 3:10pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
This is a bad idea -- taxing churches and parochial schools will be a disaster.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 134
benny salami
October 7, 2010, 5:14pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
The city council never met a tax they didn't like.


They also never met a tax they didn't hike. More "fast thinking" from the finance department?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 134
mikechristine1
October 7, 2010, 5:19pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
This is a bad idea -- taxing churches and parochial schools will be a disaster.


The better thing to do would be to take back the property tax exemptions on all those downtown businesses.  It's a worse disaster to give them tax breaks thus making the homeowners cover those costs....and the diaster has already beeen proven beyond all doubt----crime is hup, taxes are up, city services are reduced, codes are not enforced, the vacancy rate in the city of houses is up, the number of abandoned houses is up....but that is YOUR Savage and friends who spend all the money on downtown and what of it has improved the city?

Better that Golub, Mallozzi and the other wealthy for profits pay their taxes rather than tax the churches and many of the non-profits.

But some of those "everything-for-downtown" dems wouldn't dare want to make the millionaires pay their property taxes, only the lower income homeowners, and the elderly on social security.


Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 4 - 134
benny salami
October 7, 2010, 5:26pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
   Golub doesn't pay any tax. They rent from Galesi, at a below market square footage rate. The HQ on Nott should be fully assessed. It isn't. Between Proctor's grabbing bank buildings on State and sweet tax deals no wonder the City can't pay its bills.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 134
McQueen
October 7, 2010, 5:27pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from mikechristine1


Better that Golub, Mallozzi and the other wealthy for profits pay their taxes rather than tax the churches and many of the non-profits.

But some of those "everything-for-downtown" dems wouldn't dare want to make the millionaires pay their property taxes, only the lower income homeowners, and the elderly on social security.


Better that the esteemed Metroplex cronies pay their fair share and not only eliminate this practically negligible, bordering on illegal, "curb fee", but they should be taking the tax burden off the homeowners. Let's see how long Golub, Marcella or Mallozzi stay in Schenectady once they lose their "get of of Metro-tax free" card. Abolish metroplex and give the City back millions.  
Logged
E-mail Reply: 6 - 134
benny salami
October 7, 2010, 6:57pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
Quoted from 737


Better that the esteemed Metroplex cronies pay their fair share and not only eliminate this practically negligible, bordering on illegal, "curb fee", but they should be taking the tax burden off the homeowners. Let's see how long Golub, Marcella or Mallozzi stay in Schenectady once they lose their "get of of Metro-tax free" card. Abolish metroplex and give the City back millions.  


But haven't you heard that Metrograft created 3,500 new jobs? lol. That's why total County employment dropped 1,000 between 2000-2010.

     Abolish Metrograft and give consumers a reason to buy in Schenectady County again. Nobody wants to count the thousands of jobs lost in retail since we lost our sales tax advantage. Our sales tax is now higher than surrounding Counties. You forget more about economics than these morons know McQueen.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 134
bumblethru
October 7, 2010, 7:37pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
It is time to summons Mr. Hugh Farley, now and when elected, to bring legislation forth to de solve the metroplex. It clearly has NOT accomplished what it was originated to do. It was suppose to be BI-PARTISAN and it was suppose to benefit ALL of Schenectady County. Not just the 2 blocks of State St. It was suppose to create jobs and lower taxes.

It has done just the opposite on ALL counts.

Email, snail mail and call Mr. Hugh Farley and tell him that it is time to legislate a law disbanding the Metroplex!!!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 134
The Source
October 7, 2010, 8:50pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from benny salami
   Golub doesn't pay any tax. They rent from Galesi, at a below market square footage rate. The HQ on Nott should be fully assessed. It isn't. Between Proctor's grabbing bank buildings on State and sweet tax deals no wonder the City can't pay its bills.


Golub doesn't pay any tax because he is on the Metroplex Board and they wanted to cover it up. Galesi received millions in state and Metroplex grants and loans, thus lowering Golub's rent!
Logged
E-mail Reply: 9 - 134
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
October 8, 2010, 8:08pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
If the curb tax passes .. I guess my parish could ask the bishop if we could build a new church on the
5+ vacant acres (behind the cemetery) that we own in Rotterdam.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 134
Shadow
October 8, 2010, 8:40pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
That's exactly what people are doing leaving and that's why there are so many empty houses in the city. Taxes are too high and the streets are too dangerous and everyone knows it.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 134
senders
October 9, 2010, 7:56am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
$10,000-$12,000 in taxes for homes in the city.....that's after the guanese were lured here and given tax discount then hit with full tax assessment.......they promised GOOD jobs too....hahahhahahahaha

when in Rome let it burn.....and apparently they will considering the layoff of firefighters.......joke.....

get rid of dumbass mandates from the state to the county to the city......WE CANT AFFORD THIS NANNY STATE........


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 134
mikechristine1
October 9, 2010, 11:14am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
If the curb tax passes .. I guess my parish could ask the bishop if we could build a new church on the
5+ vacant acres (behind the cemetery) that we own in Rotterdam.


Well it's YOUR democrats that are taxing them.  A church gets it's income from the congregation.  The congregation is comprised of people who own homes and pay their own property taxes and curb fees.  

So now, thanks to YOUR democrats who exempt the millionaires from paying their taxes, well, the parishoners who pay not only their own taxes on their own homes, AND they pay for the property taxes of the well-heeled rich business owners downtown, now he parishoners will pay double the curb fee----they will pay their own AND they will have to pay more to the parish in order for the parisn to pay the curb fee.....all because Schenetady needs money.  And YOUR democrats in Schenectady are too chicken to tell the millionaires that they have to pay their own property taxes.....see, again, I have proven....YOUR democrats take form the lower income to give to the rich......raise the taxes on the lower income in order to exempt the rich from property taxes..    

And in exchange for all the increased taxes on the lower income, in exchange for all the "take from the poor to give to the rich," what have Schenectady residents got for that?   Higher taxes, lower property values, increased crime, cutting neccessary services, and the spending, no, the WASTING of money on stupid ABSOLUTELY UNNECESSARY things like a bike path.



Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 13 - 134
The Source
October 9, 2010, 11:27am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from mikechristine1


Well it's YOUR democrats that are taxing them.  A church gets it's income from the congregation.  The congregation is comprised of people who own homes and pay their own property taxes and curb fees.  

So now, thanks to YOUR democrats who exempt the millionaires from paying their taxes, well, the parishoners who pay not only their own taxes on their own homes, AND they pay for the property taxes of the well-heeled rich business owners downtown, now he parishoners will pay double the curb fee----they will pay their own AND they will have to pay more to the parish in order for the parisn to pay the curb fee.....all because Schenetady needs money.  And YOUR democrats in Schenectady are too chicken to tell the millionaires that they have to pay their own property taxes.....see, again, I have proven....YOUR democrats take form the lower income to give to the rich......raise the taxes on the lower income in order to exempt the rich from property taxes..    

And in exchange for all the increased taxes on the lower income, in exchange for all the "take from the poor to give to the rich," what have Schenectady residents got for that?   Higher taxes, lower property values, increased crime, cutting neccessary services, and the spending, no, the WASTING of money on stupid ABSOLUTELY UNNECESSARY things like a bike path.


Well said Mike, except no one would be dumb enough to open a business in the city unless they were bribed into it.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 14 - 134
9 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Schenectady's Proposed "Curb Tax"

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread