Quoted Text

Democrats’ idea of the the 10 Commandments


The Democratic Party's 10 Commandments.
1. We are the deity, the Democratic Party — thou shall not bow down to any graven ideas except our ideas of higher taxes, massive spending, redistribution of wealth and increasing deficits. 2. Thou shall not make for yourself a graven image of a country based on capitalism, but instead thou shall embrace collectivism as espoused by the Lord Barack Obama and his mentor, Saul Alinsky. 3. Thou shall not, at town hall meetings or tea parties, deride policies of the Lord Barack Obama or thou shall be called a mob, un-American or domestic terrorist. 4. Remember the 9/11 day and do all in thy power to punish those who have kept us safe in the aftermath. 5. Honor the state above thy family and friends, 6. Thou shall not commit murder unless it is abortion, and then thou should embrace it with thy whole heart and thy whole soul. 7. Thou shall not commit adultery unless thou are John Edwards, Eliot Spitzer or Bill Clinton. 8. Thou shall not steal unless thou are stealing from future generations with massive deficits and huge government spending. 9. Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor unless he is a Republican. 10. Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's goods unless he has more than you do; then it is right and proper to take it from him.

WILLIAM F. MALEC
Galway

http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....r00507&AppName=1

That's pretty close to the truth with this administration and the media.

Quoted from Shadow

That's pretty close to the truth with this administration and the media.

Paranoia is a thought process characterized by excessive anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion. Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory beliefs concerning a perceived threat towards oneself-

These same Ten Commandments have been circulating via emails for months.

Quoted Text

Letter writer had it all wrong about Democrats

    Re the Sept. 9 letter on the Democratic Party’s 10 commandments:
    It is curious that the writer used the “commandment” format. To command is to control, and in my opinion the Obama administration and the Democratic Party (I hesitate to be so general) is all about not controlling people’s lives — allowing people choices, not judging your neighbor, realizing we all come from different life circumstances and that we need to help those who cannot help themselves.
    We can stand in our own shoes only, and as the president so eloquently said in his speech to schoolchildren recently: “Everyone has something to offer.”
    Doesn’t it also say somewhere “judge not, lest ye be judged?” Oh, yeah, in the Bible.

    TERESA DORIGUZZI
    Delanson

http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....r00707&AppName=1

Funny the writer should quote the bible when our liberal legislature and liberal courts keep throwing any reference to the bible or ten commandments out of all public schools and buildings, it's that hostile work environment thing again.

she talks about judgement----what about discernment???? and some judgements made at a certain period in time become
stale shew bread later in time......

as for Ms.Doriguzzi-----pass the flower and the cool-aide

Quoted Text

and in my opinion the Obama administration and the Democratic Party (I hesitate to be so general) is all about not controlling people’s lives

Um, ok, ya. How's that healthcare thing working again? How about the gun law proposals? Cap and Trade?

Quoted from senders

she talks about judgement----what about discernment???? and some judgements made at a certain period in time become
stale shew bread later in time......

as for Ms.Doriguzzi-----pass the flower and the cool-aide

The fact is that all of us, without exception, make judgments all day- unless maybe those in a coma ...  judgment is a process of ESTIMATION or EVALUATION ...  so the discernment is implied-

Quoted from Sombody

The fact is that all of us, without exception, make judgments all day- unless maybe those in a coma ...  judgment is a process of ESTIMATION or EVALUATION ...  so the discernment is implied-

my point being that I hope, ALL of us, myself included would use discernement and wisdom BEFORE judgement....

like the evaluation of my home for tax purposes---- making light here....

do we chew our food and taste it or just put it in and swallow????

Quoted Text

Protesters weren’t tolerated under Bush

    How short our selective memories are in regard to presidential protesters. In William Malec’s Sept. 9 letter, he states, “Thou shall not . . . deride policies of the Lord Barack Obama or thou shall be called a mob, un-American or domestic terrorist.”
    Fortunately for former President Bush, these situations were avoided altogether by suppressing any protests before they even started.
    For example, at a speech given in Charlottesville, Va., in July 2008, protesters were simply removed by police before they could cause a disturbance. In August 1999, then-Gov. George W. Bush was sued by protesters, accused of giving state troopers “unbridled discretion” to stop picketers from gathering in front of the governor's mansion. In 2002, when a protester refused to stand half a mile away from Bush supporters, he was arrested.
    It would behoove Mr. Malec and others to be more familiar with recent history before making statements like these.

    BOBBIE HLAT
    Scotia

http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....r00708&AppName=1

From what I have seen when viewing protests organized by the left wingers there always seems to be violence and property destruction involved so when they get unruly they should be removed b4 any damage can be done. There were approx 1.3 million people in Washington DC last weekend, estimated by a firm from Nebraska, and according to Capital Police reports there were 0 incidents of violence or damage by any of those attending. The left has a very bad track record when it comes to peaceful protest. Was it not members of the far left group of environmental activists who just used a bulldozer to knock down a couple of radio towers in the west.

In most cases, not all, the right protests with 'brain'....the left protests with 'brawn'.IMHO

The left has always had a propensity for violence and mayhem which is passed onto them by their godfathers, the French revolutionists and the Russian Bolsheviks. Despite this they are reminiscent of the alcoholic who finds his faults in others and lashes out at them. They accuse the conservatives and constitutionalists of being violent and threatening but the record is clear that the assassinations of our presidents have occurred by leftists Booth, Czolgosz (aka Nieman) and Oswald. these were all true radicals who hated America. The other attempts and assassinations of candidates were also leftist (Kennedy- Sirhansirhan and Ford- Moore and Fromme.) Of course they try to say things all utterly false like "Oswald was working for the CIA" even though he was a known communist! So they try to expunge their guilt and place it on the conservatives in a unique and pathological manner which often times reminds me that, as Michael Savage says, "liberalism is a mental disorder."

All in all, the left has been responsible for more mayhem, death and destruction than any other movement in world history including the Mongol horde, the Islamic jihads, and the black plague. Of course if you expect to hear that fact you are treated to America's history of slavery and the Christian Crusades as being the most evil and offensive acts of mankind. Yet the fact remains that communism, national socialism and the aftermath and results have plunged the world to the brink of extinction and darkness throughout the last century leaving 100s of millions dead in it's wake. So the next time a totalitarian liberal American tries to tell you why the conservatives are dangerous, remind them of their violent and blood thirsty ideological history, since history can be a good indicator of future results.

You left out a few words-The RIGHT has always had a propensity for violence and mayhem which is passed onto them by their godfathers, the French revolutionists and the Russian Bolsheviks. Despite this they are reminiscent of the alcoholic who finds his faults in others and lashes out at them. They accuse the LIBERAL and constitutionalists of being violent and threatening but the record is clear that the assassinations of our presidents have occurred by CONSERVATIVE FANATICS Booth, Czolgosz (aka Nieman) and Oswald. these were all true radicals who hated America. The other attempts and assassinations of candidates were also CONSERVATIVE (Kennedy- Sirhansirhan and Ford- Moore and Fromme.) Of course they try to say things all utterly false like "Oswald was working for the CIA" even though he was a known communist! So they try to expunge their guilt and place it on the LIBERALS in a unique and pathological manner which often times reminds me that, a CONSERVATIVE is a mental disorder."

All in all, the RIGHT has been responsible for more mayhem, death and destruction than any other movement in world history including the Mongol horde, the Islamic jihads, and the black plague. Of course if you expect to hear that fact you are treated to America's history of slavery and the Christian Crusades as being the most evil and offensive acts of mankind. Yet the fact remains that communism, national socialism and the aftermath and results have plunged the world to the brink of extinction and darkness throughout the last century leaving 100s of millions dead in it's wake. So the next time a CONSTIPATED CONSERVATIVE  American tries to tell you why the LIBERALS are dangerous, remind them of their violent and blood thirsty ideological history, since history can be a good indicator of future results