My wife got an email today that made us peuk. We KNOW now that Palin must be kept out of the white house and should be sent back to the whore house we saw this : She was standing by the pool with a bunch of other putans and she had a bikini on like an American flag and she had an assault weapon of some sort she was pointing! WHAT kind of putan does that? WHY would you people defend her??? Its time she resign, and if enough of us get the message out to McCain then he may fire her off the ticket at this point since she is dragging him way down. PLEASE my friend indeed wake up! Get together and stop this over here

Photoshop is a wonderful program - it can put anyone in any pose, wearing any clothes, in any location, holding anything, etc.

Don't believe pictures that are circulated on the net

There was one being circulated showing Obama refusing to hold his hand to his heart to pledge the flag.  It turned out to be a few moments after the pledge was complete and he had just removed his hand from his heart.

Sal, While I desperately try to respect your opinion it seems to be based on some hatred of succussful women with children.  I am truly astonished that you would call someone you have no idea about a whore and a putan.  If you don't like her views or even the fact that she is running for national office with kids at home thats ok.  But to call the woman a whore is uncalled for, unfair, and despicable, especially when you do it without any basis of fact.  Prove to me she is a whore and I might just jump on your pathetic bandwagon. You have no right and have crossed the line....unless of course you are involved in some romantic tryst with her that we don't know about, perhaps you and she are sleeping together somewhere between Alaska and New York????  PROVE YOUR STATEMENT TO ME.  As for calling her baby a retard, you again have crossed the line.  I'm afraid your credibility factor has dropped to somewhere between neanderthal and cro magnon man with me.  Although I'm sure you won't lose any sleep over it. You apparently are not smart enough to debate her policies nor her record in Alaska.  You mentioned in an earlier post that we should pay attention to Sue Savage.  Are you aware of the fact that she balances raising 9 children, caring for a husband, a full time job, and the county legislature?  While I don't agree with her policies I can respect her for her accomplishments.  I'm sure there have been many bumps in the road for her both personally and professionally but with a caring husband and a devoted family unit they are able to make it work.  Lets get back on track here and discuss the issues not your ignorant opinion that she is a whore.  Until then, you are a one man show in and of itself so far because I have not heard or spoken with anyone that shares your thoughts.

Well said Rene

Quoted from 47

I was just watching Nightline and a Democratic spokesman was bashing the small town of Wasillia that Palin comes from.  He chuckled that the City Hall looked like a "bake shop".  Arrogant SOB.  This arrogance will play a significant role in the victory of the McCain/Palin ticket on election day. To discount the power of small town America will be their demise.  They also interviewed the "CEO" of the town and she indicated they would not return the calls of national reporters because they would use up the funds in the budget for that line item within a week.  Fiscal responsibility.........Gotta love that

I was watching tv today and they said that the american people, whether they would vote for Palin or not, is sympathetic to her for the way the media is treating her. They, actually it was FOX, said that the media will now have to rethink how they handle ms.palin from now on. She is a very sensitive topic for them right now. It really is not 'business as usual' on how the media handles palin. They have to regroup I guess since they are not in good standing with the american people.

Even Hillary out stumping for Obama will not throw any barbs at Palin and will only talk about the issues which is the way it should be.

Sal why don't you check Snopes and there they will tell you that the photo is fake and as MT has said it's a photo shop job and if you search the web you'll see the real girl who was in the photo. It's people like you that will fall for anything.

Quoted from Shadow

Sal why don't you check Snopes and there they will tell you that the photo is fake and as MT has said it's a photo shop job and if you search the web you'll see the real girl who was in the photo. It's people like you that will fall for anything.

They'll fall for anything - cause they don't stand for anything.

Quoted from 47

T
Sal, While I desperately try to respect your opinion it seems to be based on some hatred of succussful women with children.  

Why are you trying? I stopped replying to those silly 'just an act' posts a while ago.  I mean does anyone REALLY think this guy is for real? Come on guys/girls!!!!  Waste of my time!

You're right!

Quoted from 47

You're right!

Yes I am and we are too smart to fall for that nonsense! (I think 0

Well then  I may indeed stand corrected over here on those pictures but my wife and I were pretty upset about this here at first. Thank you for sending out the link to where it is fake on the Snopes. Sorry about it and I will apologoze for being wrong. But indeed I will say I am against her since without the experience she is a dead duck and kills the repubs. I listened to Mike Savage and he was straightening us out on this and HE is a true conservative. I think you need to look into the issues she had where she targeted the trooper and went against law enforcement too.

http://www.dailygazette.com

Quoted Text

http://www.dailygazette.com

Quoted Text

Palin pick a stroke of genius by McCain
Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist.
Mona Charen

    John McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin was the most inspired decision of his long race for the White House. The ads lampooning Barack Obama’s messianic pretensions were skillful as well. But the Palin pick accomplished several goals at once.
    It is, it must be acknowledged, a terrible year to be a Republican. A decidedly unpopular Republican president is finishing his second term. Republican party identification is at its lowest point in 16 years (27 percent, according to the Pew Research Center). All indicia of excitement — money raising, turnout at political events, buzz — strongly favor the Democrats. Further, the attractive, articulate, and charismatic Democratic nominee is an historic fi rst — the first African-American nominated by a major party.
    Who would have believed, two weeks ago, that Republicans would march out of their convention more pumped than they have felt since Reagan?
    The choice of Palin has recast the entire election. Until McCain chose his vice president, the election was shaping up to be about “change.” Obama was playing the role of knight errant, and McCain was cast as the candidate of the status quo. Many a Democratic speaker in Denver invited the delegates to regard a prospective McCain presidency as “Bush’s third term.”
    McCain declined to play his appointed part. Had he chosen any of the most often mentioned candidates for the second spot — Romney, Pawlenty, Ridge — it would have been impossible to escape the sense of “same old same old” that would have followed the ticket like stale cigar smoke. However much one might revere older white guys, and some of my best friends are OWGs, there is no escaping the fact that this was not the year for such a ticket.
    Liberals have indignantly protested that McCain’s choice of a woman was a “cynical” bid for disgruntled Hillary Clinton voters. But I don’t think that’s what this was about. In Palin, McCain found a reformer. He sees himself as a reformer and a clean government crusader. One might not always agree with his idea of reform (certainly campaign finance reform struck me as a blow to the First Amendment), but that he sees himself in that role is indisputable. In Sarah Palin, he found, as David Brooks shrewdly observed, a kindred spirit. Not just a soul mate but a gal with pizzazz and spirit! Who can resist a governor who comes into office on a promise to clean house and promptly sells the luxury jet her predecessor had bought on eBay? (She let the chauffeur and chef go, too.) Palin has confronted the corruption of her own party, just as McCain has done in Washington by challenging those among his colleagues he calls, not affectionately, “the appropriators.” This throws down the gauntlet to Obama to cite a single instance when his mantra of change has been backed by actions. Has he ever crossed swords with those in his party? Ever denounced corruption among Democrats? His acceptance speech was a liberal wish list indistinguishable in content from those of Mondale, Dukakis, Clinton, and Kerry. Is this change?
    McCain must also have calculated that Palin’s expertise on energy would help highlight the one domestic issue that has emerged as a clear winner for Republicans. One looks forward eagerly to the day when he explains that Sarah Palin has convinced him to reverse his opposition to drilling in ANWR.
    And McCain must also have sensed that a young, attractive woman from a western state would inject a dose of energy and enthusiasm into the race. On this, McCain may not have even guessed at how right he was (though one senses that Cindy McCain knew). Sarah Palin is political dynamite. She has transformed Republicans from fl accid to fired-up overnight. Just by being prolife, small town, patriotic, and religious, she set the teeth of the media types on edge. By being all of that AND smart and articulate, and a budget hawk, she sent conservatives over the moon.
    Together McCain and Palin have changed the game. They have seized the mantle of reform and dare the Democrats to show anything comparable. In this worst of all years for Republicans, it no longer seems fanciful to imagine that they can win.