Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
"Burn Barrels" Statewide Ban
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    New York State  ›  "Burn Barrels" Statewide Ban Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 83 Guests

"Burn Barrels" Statewide Ban  This thread currently has 3,097 views. |
2 Pages « 1 2 Recommend Thread
Admin
April 8, 2009, 4:29am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text

Burn waste, it’s cleaner than landfill methane


    New York state is ignoring massive methane and carbon dioxide emissions from municipal solid waste landfills.
    Methane is 21 times as potent a greenhouse gas as carbon dioxide. Our governor's environmental secretary has long opposed waste-to-energy as an obstacle to zero wastes, which is an impossible goal. One of the most hypocritical environmental/energy policies of our state is the policy of not recognizing municipal solid waste a renewable biofuel and discouraging waste-to-energy.
    On March 4, a bipartisan group of 15 U.S. senators urged that waste-to-energy be included in any renewable portfolio standard considered by the Senate. Several states, European countries and Japan recognize wasteto-energy as an important renewable energy source. Waste-to-energy has only about 5 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions of landfills, and is a valuable means of reducing our dependence on foreign fuels.
    It is foolish to put our energy-containing wastes in the ground, or hope that all our wastes will be recycled. Only about 20 percent of plastics can be effectively recycled.
    Our senators' new, positive energy policy, recognizing waste-to-energy as renewable energy, has many benefits. We must redefine municipal solid waste as renewable. We must make our energy and environmental choices solely on the basis of good science and technology, not ideology — and pursue a rational policy of zero wastes to landfills as Europe has done.

    JACK D. LAUBER
    Latham
The writer is a licensed professional engineer.

http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....amp;EntityId=Ar00506
Logged
Private Message Reply: 15 - 24
GrahamBonnet
April 8, 2009, 7:27am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
This guy is right, but he uses too much common sense to get his ideas through. There needs to be a political angle. Like burning the wastes to make energy is better for minorities or something. We all need to work long and hard to come up with that. He is starting to go on the right track though. People won't demand this sort of thing until their National Grid bills average 1k per month.


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 16 - 24
MobileTerminal
April 8, 2009, 7:51am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from GrahamBonnet
This guy is right, but he uses too much common sense to get his ideas through. There needs to be a political angle. Like burning the wastes to make energy is better for minorities or something. We all need to work long and hard to come up with that. He is starting to go on the right track though. People won't demand this sort of thing until their National Grid bills average 1k per month.


Wait, are you saying everyone else's bill ISN'T nearly $1k?   WTF.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 17 - 24
Salvatore
April 8, 2009, 5:41pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
mine was 400 I think this winter on normal use over here
Logged
E-mail Reply: 18 - 24
senders
April 15, 2009, 2:12pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from 191
mine was 400 I think this winter on normal use over here


we're coming to your house for the barbeque......


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 19 - 24
Admin
September 26, 2009, 4:00am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
State should ban outdoor wood boilers immediately

    Re the Aug. 28 letter from Bonnie Lichak of Nassau: Thank you, Bonnie, for your letter. We could not have said it better ourselves. We have been saying the same thing since March, 2008.
    We live in Perth in Fulton County. We had the smell of wood smoke in our yard and home last winter as a result of living downwind from a neighbor with an outdoor wood boiler (OWB). We even know a family that has to sleep in their basement to avoid breathing its neighbors’ smoke. The smell is disgusting and sickening.
    Being a two-time cancer survivor, my husband and I know the damage that is being done by allowing people to use OWBs. Yes, "smoke gets in your lungs." We want to see OWBs totally banned.
    Nobody seems to be in charge of this issue. Our votes are wanted at election time. Where are the people we vote for, and why are they not doing their jobs? Where is Gov. Paterson now? Winter will be fast approaching. Health-care costs keep rising — doesn't anybody see the picture, or is the smoke too thick?
    Too much time has elapsed regarding this issue. Ban OWBs now, Gov. Paterson. Everyone has the right to breathe clean air!

    NANCY AND ROGER TYLER
    Perth

http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....r00906&AppName=1
Logged
Private Message Reply: 20 - 24
MobileTerminal
September 26, 2009, 5:38am Report to Moderator
Guest User
I bet it took Nancy and Roger a month to respond because they were out camping (with a campfire).

Give me a break.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 21 - 24
bumblethru
September 26, 2009, 7:55am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
I'm all for OWB, but I do have a couple of friends that live near people who have them. They said that the stacks are too short and the smoke blows right at their homes. And that the people with OWB throw any kind of wood and 'stuff' in it. This is hearing it 3rd hand, so I don't know the specifics.

My only question is.....how long have these OWB been in existence and why is it NOW that they are having concerns? Is it the existing ones or is it the added newly erected ones?


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 22 - 24
Admin
October 14, 2009, 5:17am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
CAPITAL REGION
State widens ban on burnin
g
BY EDWARD MUNGER JR. Gazette Reporter

    Farmers and residents in rural areas face additional restrictions on open burning today as new state regulations go into effect.
    The state Department of Environmental Conservation strengthened the rule, which already bans open burning in municipalities with more than 20,000 residents.
    The new regulation prohibits burning trash and rubbish statewide now, with some exceptions, and imposes fines ranging from $375 up to $15,000 for a first offense, DEC spokeswoman Lori Severino said.
    “The overall objective of it is to help prevent pollution and encourage better air quality,” Severino said.
    The rule is expected to lessen the amount of toxins sent into the air by burn barrels, which are more common in rural areas than in urban communities.
    “We believe that people who have lung disease in smaller communities should be afforded the same rights to be able to breathe healthier air,” said Michael Seilback, vice president of public policy and communications at the American Lung Association in New York.
    “We often think of rural communities as the places where you’re going to have cleaner, fresher air. But unfortunately, due to open burning, that’s not always the case,” Seilback said.
    Burning materials like foam, other plastics and colored paper releases heavy metals into the air and ground, and the ash that remains after burning residential waste is known to contain lead, nickel and chromium. ......................>>>>..................................>>>>...................http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....r00901&AppName=1
Logged
Private Message Reply: 23 - 24
Vaedur
October 14, 2009, 2:16pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
778
Reputation
75.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -1
Time Online
16 days 4 hours 45 minutes
Think of the poor defenseless Barrels!


I don't spell check!  Sorry...
If you include "No offense" in a statement, chances are, your statement is offensive.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 24 - 24
2 Pages « 1 2 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread