well....the old house of cards is clearly FALLING APART!
I don't know if the new house of cards will be better.

Quoted Text

Here’s a recent tweet from McMullen:

Follow
Evan McMullin ✔ @Evan_McMullin
.@realDonaldTrump is attempting to obscure the truth that Russia did act to influence our presidential election. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/808299841147248640 …
10:36 AM - 12 Dec 2016
  2,419 2,419 Retweets   4,244 4,244 likes

No, the real security breach is that Saudi Arabia and the CIA are working to not only influence an election, but, having failed, to undermine and possibly overturn one. As Justin Raimondo writes at AntiWar.com,

The Saudis, having given millions to the Clinton Foundation, along with their Gulf state allies, were counting on a Clinton victory. The CIA has a longstanding relationship with Riyadh, and together they have been working assiduously to not only overthrow Assad in Syria but to forge a “moderate” Sunni alliance that will effectively police the region while establishing the Saudis as the regional hegemon. This was the Clintonian strategy while Hillary was at the helm of Foggy Bottom: Libya, Syria, the alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, are all examples of this utterly disastrous “Sunni turn.”

Trump represents a threat to this grand design, and therefore has to be stopped by whatever means necessary. His desire to “get along with Russia,” his opposition to regime change in Syria, his critique of the Libyan misadventure, his foreign policy stance in general – all this meant that he would come to power and “drain the swamp” of the CIA and the State Department.
And the mainstream media not only recites unsubstantiated claims from anonymous sources in the CIA, but is doing all it can to convince dupes that the CIA is “not political.”

http://constitution.com/cia-coup-attempt-unfolding-eyes-video/

Quoted from CICERO

BWAHAHAHAHAH....no LEAKS, no HACKING, no FALSE FLAGS, no CONSPIRACIES, not related to this thread topic AT ALL....
THEY WERE HIRED CONSULTANTS!!!!!!
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/07.....sin-or-did-they.html

Trying to post twitter acct pics????? BWAHAHAHAHHHH!!!
But no comment on your irrelevant Time mag posting....how come?
Oh, that's right....forgot...Sissypoo NEVER admits mistakes...he can do no wrong!!!


PS - Is this pic you were trying to post????

Quoted from joebxr

Trying to post twitter acct pics????? BWAHAHAHAHHHH!!!
But no comment on your irrelevant Time mag posting....how come?
Oh, that's right....forgot...Sissypoo NEVER admits mistakes...he can do no wrong!!!

The Time mag post is evidence that the US brags about influencing Russian election, while your conspiracy theory about Russia hacking and influencing US elections with no evidence is just that, a conspiracy theory.  But there is evidence the DNC rigged their election and conspired with the media to damage one of their own candidates.

Josepi still hanging on to the "it's the russians" to excuse the corrupt Democrat party.  

Quoted from CICERO

The Time mag post is evidence that the US brags about influencing Russian election, while your conspiracy theory about Russia hacking and influencing US elections with no evidence is just that, a conspiracy theory.  But there is evidence the DNC rigged their election and conspired with the media to damage one of their own candidates.

Josepi still hanging on to the "it's the russians" to excuse the corrupt Democrat party.  

(1) I have never defended either party as not being corrupt, so prove your false accusation!
(2) Where is proof that US Gov had anything to do with Time mag...prove that false claim.
(3) Russians hired US consultants, not US Gov numbnuts...you are really reaching and failing each time!
(4) Personally, I believe Russians and number of other countries are always hacking into our systems.
As for the election, any of them could have leaked the stories about DNC, and that may have had some impact on
the voting....but doubt it was enough to influence outcome. DEMS lost because of who they put up for POTUS...plain and simple!
(5) Conspiracy theories is your buddy Dumbler's claim to fame, not mine....I dispute those claims!
(6) "But there is evidence the DNC rigged their election and conspired with the media to damage one of their own candidates."
Love to hear your explanation and proof on this one!!!!!

This confirms my earlier post about Wikileaks acquiring emails (Podesta's and the DNC) through a leak and NOT by hacking, even Russian ones....


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....cratic-insiders.html

Quoted from BuckStrider

This confirms my earlier post about Wikileaks acquiring emails (Podesta's and the DNC) through a leak and NOT by hacking, even Russian ones....


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....cratic-insiders.html

Doubt we'll ever really know the truth....or be given believable evidence to support whichever path.
What gets me is that none of it was influential enough to lose the vote...it was the poor caliber of candidate.
The rest that came out just disgusted people about the crookedness of the DEMS and REPS both.
Can't believe that's going to improve under the Trumper....he's in it for himself!

Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking
http://www.usatoday.com/story/.....nd-hacking/92514592/

The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.

Some states have also recently seen scanning and probing of their election-related systems, which in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company. However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government. The USIC and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) assess that it would be extremely difficult for someone, including a nation-state actor, to alter actual ballot counts or election results by cyber attack or intrusion. This assessment is based on the decentralized nature of our election system in this country and the number of protections state and local election officials have in place. States ensure that voting machines are not connected to the Internet, and there are numerous checks and balances as well as extensive oversight at multiple levels built into our election process.

Nevertheless, DHS continues to urge state and local election officials to be vigilant and seek cybersecurity assistance from DHS. A number of states have already done so. DHS is providing several services to state and local election officials to assist in their cybersecurity. These services include cyber “hygiene” scans of Internet-facing systems, risk and vulnerability assessments, information sharing about cyber incidents, and best practices for securing voter registration databases and addressing potential cyber threats. DHS has convened an Election Infrastructure Cybersecurity Working Group with experts across all levels of government to raise awareness of cybersecurity risks potentially affecting election infrastructure and the elections process. Secretary Johnson and DHS officials are working directly with the National Association of Secretaries of State to offer assistance, share information, and provide additional resources to state and local officials.

# # #

Quoted from CICERO

The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations.
# # #

Stay tuned for the TIME MAGAZINE version!

Quoted Text

The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations.  However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Governmet