Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
RUSSIA hacked DNC, RNC?...FALSE FLAG/NEWS?
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  RUSSIA hacked DNC, RNC?...FALSE FLAG/NEWS? Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 62 Guests

RUSSIA hacked DNC, RNC?...FALSE FLAG/NEWS?  This thread currently has 7,760 views. |
6 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 » Recommend Thread
bumblethru
December 12, 2016, 7:55am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Quoted Text
John Bolton, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations who has been floated for a possible role in Donald Trump’s State Department, questioned reports of Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election.


“It is not at all clear to me, just viewing this from the outside, that this hacking into the DNC and the RNC was not a false flag operation,” he told Fox News’ Eric Shawn on Sunday.
When pressed about his use of the phrase “false flag” and whether he was accusing an entity in the U.S. of involvement, Bolton said, “We just don’t know.”

http://thehill.com/homenews/309897-bolton-questions-if-russian-hacks-were-false-flag


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message
joebxr
December 12, 2016, 8:39am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted Text
But, “if you think the Russians did this, then why did they leave fingerprints?” that led the CIA to its conclusion, Bolton questioned.

“We would want to know who else might want to influence the election and why they would leave fingerprints that point to the Russians.
That’s why I say until we know more about how the intelligence community came to this conclusion we don’t know whether it is Russian inspired or a false flag."

Gee, could it be that our tech nerds have a more sophisticated program that can detect the
fingerprints...is it possible our techies are more advanced???? DUH!!!!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 83
CICERO
December 12, 2016, 9:20am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

Gee, could it be that our tech nerds have a more sophisticated program that can detect the
fingerprints...is it possible our techies are more advanced???? DUH!!!!


Just not sophisticated or advanced enough to prevent the alleged hack?  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 83
joebxr
December 12, 2016, 9:26am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Just not sophisticated or advanced enough to prevent the alleged hack?  

Ah, my personal troll has jumped in.  Do you even understand
how hacking is done?  You can put up all the firewalls and blocks and encryption you want,
but there's always someone spending the time to circumvent all your security measures.
When that happens, you identify the source, identify the holes and close them until the next
hacker finds the next hole! The most common way is through email, and many of the hacks are
successful that way


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 83
CICERO
December 12, 2016, 11:01am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

Ah, my personal troll has jumped in.  Do you even understand
how hacking is done?  You can put up all the firewalls and blocks and encryption you want,
but there's always someone spending the time to circumvent all your security measures.
When that happens, you identify the source, identify the holes and close them until the next
hacker finds the next hole! The most common way is through email, and many of the hacks are
successful that way


Ok...so the CIA is making sure that a hacker can never hack into a data base and expose that a US political party is rigging their primary elections by colluding with corporate media to get the desired outcome of an election?  Shouldn't the FBI be investigating into the Democrat Party's manipulating and collusion with the MSM and insuring open and fair elections?



Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 83
bumblethru
December 12, 2016, 12:23pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
BRILLIANT!!

Quoted from CICERO


Ok...so the CIA is making sure that a hacker can never hack into a data base and expose that a US political party is rigging their primary elections by colluding with corporate media to get the desired outcome of an election?  Shouldn't the FBI be investigating into the Democrat Party's manipulating and collusion with the MSM and insuring open and fair elections?





When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 83
joebxr
December 12, 2016, 3:28pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from bumblethru
BRILLIANT!!




A statement filled with unsubstantiated flawed non-factual data....figures you think it's brilliant!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 83
CICERO
December 12, 2016, 3:30pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 83
BuckStrider
December 12, 2016, 3:31pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
If anyone would know about foreign interference in elections, it would be Obama.

Remember, it was the Obama administration back in 2015 that gave $300k to a 'pro-peace' Israeli group that then paid off political operatives to try and unseat Netanyahu during their elections.

This Russian hacking bullshit is exactly that....Bullshit. It wouldn't shock me in the least if down the road it turns out it was another one of Obama's 'false flags' or 'fake news'....Just like they pulled with "It was a YouTube video" that caused Benghazi.




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 83
BuckStrider
December 12, 2016, 3:35pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes














"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 83
bumblethru
December 12, 2016, 3:56pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
ya just can't make this stuff up!!!!


Quoted Text
CONFUSION: WH spokesman claims ‘China’ hacked election
DECEMBER 12, 2016
BY KYLE OLSON

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/confusion-wh-spokesman-claims-china-hacked-election/


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 83
CICERO
December 12, 2016, 8:23pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

A statement filled with unsubstantiated flawed non-factual data....figures you think it's brilliant!


Actually...Quote below is filled with "unsubstantiated flawed non-factual data"...aka - conspiracy theory.

Quoted from joebxr

Gee, could it be that our tech nerds have a more sophisticated program that can detect the
fingerprints...is it possible our techies are more advanced???? DUH!!!!


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 83
BuckStrider
December 12, 2016, 9:10pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
It's falling apart....Oh and lets be VERY CLEAR about one thing....The RNC WAS NOT HACKED


http://www.bizpacreview.com/20.....r-not-russian-422765

Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian

Quoted Text
On Sunday, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, said he has met the person who gave the DNC emails and it was not the Russians.


And the reason why Wikileaks did what they did....

Quoted Text
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”


Now if you believe the accuracy of this guy or not, one thing is pretty clear...Wikileaks does have a track record of being honest.

Quoted Text
In the UK, one single article sums up the total abnegation of all journalistic standards. The truly execrable Jonathan Freedland of the Guardian writes “Few credible sources doubt that Russia was behind the hacking of internal Democratic party emails, whose release by Julian Assange was timed to cause maximum pain to Hillary Clinton and pleasure for Trump.” Does he produce any evidence at all for this assertion? No, none whatsoever. What does a journalist mean by a “credible source”? Well, any journalist worth their salt in considering the credibility of a source will first consider access. Do they credibly have access to the information they claim to have?

Now both Julian Assange and I have stated definitively the leak does not come from Russia. Do we credibly have access? Yes, very obviously. Very, very few people can be said to definitely have access to the source of the leak. The people saying it is not Russia are those who do have access. After access, you consider truthfulness. Do Julian Assange and I have a reputation for truthfulness? Well in 10 years not one of the tens of thousands of documents WikiLeaks has released has had its authenticity successfully challenged. As for me, I have a reputation for inconvenient truth-telling.

Contrast this to the “credible sources” Freedland relies on. What access do they have to the whistleblower? Zero. They have not the faintest idea who the whistleblower is. Otherwise they would have arrested them. What reputation do they have for truthfulness? It’s the Clinton gang and the US government, for goodness sake.

In fact, the sources any serious journalist would view as “credible” give the opposite answer to the one Freedland wants. But in what passes for Freedland’s mind, “credible” is 100% synonymous with “establishment”. When he says “credible sources” he means “establishment sources”. That is the truth of the “fake news” meme. You are not to read anything unless it is officially approved by the elite and their disgusting, crawling whores of stenographers like Freedland.


I think this just bullshit made up by a terribly butthurt Clinton campaign and the DNC in general.








"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 83
joebxr
December 13, 2016, 5:27am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Actually...Quote below is filled with "unsubstantiated flawed non-factual data"...aka - conspiracy theory.



You still display your lack of ability to understand words that are written!
Conspiracy????  Really???? Nothing like that or supporting of your claims
about my statement. You're really reaching, but that's what trolls do!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 13 - 83
CICERO
December 13, 2016, 6:46am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes




Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 83
6 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  RUSSIA hacked DNC, RNC?...FALSE FLAG/NEWS?

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread