So there is a LAW that mandates the delegates to vote based on the results of the primary or caucus? Do delegates get fined or jailed if they vote for a different candidate for which the primary bound them to?
Yes. A LAW passed by the GOP to regulate it's party.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
We all know that GUNHUGGIN' Republicans love their guns and hate gun laws, and they often ridicule "gun free zones". Yet, the Republican National Convention has OUTLAWED GUNS!!! I think that every Gunhugger in the Convention should be able to 'open carry' there. Why shouldn't these NRA lovin' GunHuggers be subject to every pissed off, WELL ARMED Trump supporter, if Trump has the nomination taken away from him by the GOP. And Donald has promised 'riots'. ~~~ NoGunFree Zones at the GOP CONVENTION! ~~~
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Yes. A LAW passed by the GOP to regulate it's party.
Exactly...No state or federal law binding delegates to vote for the candidate that wins the popular vote in the primary. The parties have "rules" and delegates have "duties".
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
“Look, they made this bed, they’ve been willingly allowing the Tea Party extremists to take over their party, and so they have only themselves to blame with the likelihood of having a presumptive nominee like Donald Trump, who is the most extreme and vile, misogynistic candidate in modern times.”
— DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz,
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
"He cannot stick to a subject, it is remarkable. And when he doesn’t know something, he just changes the subject, makes it all about himself.” “He is completely uneducated about any part of the world.”
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
I don't support Trump. Be he is right. The media gives the people that created the ad attacking his wife a free pass. They focus on Trump's response, but have done no investigation into the ties the Super Pac has to the Republican Party and candidates running against Trump. The media isn't interested in the antagonist that started attacking his wife.
I don't support Trump. Be he is right. The media gives the people that created the ad attacking his wife a free pass. They focus on Trump's response, but have done no investigation into the ties the Super Pac has to the Republican Party and candidates running against Trump. The media isn't interested in the antagonist that started attacking his wife.
That's because "journalists" like Anderson Copper are lazy self promoters that are only worried about ratings... They like the low hanging fruit. Trump is a dream for them because all they need to do is react to his statements.
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Is Trump responsible for his own words and actions or not? Regardless of what a political PAC did, Trump is the one who is running for US President, not the PAC.
"They Started It"... is a 5th grade response.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Is Trump responsible for his own words and actions or not? Regardless of what a political PAC did, Trump is the one who is running for US President, not the PAC.
"They Started It"... is a 5th grade response.
Regardless of what the political PAC did? The political PAC was attacking his wife and he was defending his wife by attacking back. You would let your wife get attacked without defending her?
I agree with Trump...Fight fire with fire. Especially when defending your wife. You want to excuse the political PAC and you expect Trump to just sit back and allow his wife to be attacked. Only a spineless man would sit back and let his wife get attacked without hitting back.
Regardless of what the political PAC did? The political PAC was attacking his wife and he was defending his wife by attacking back. You would let your wife get attacked without defending her?
I agree with Trump...Fight fire with fire. Especially when defending your wife. You want to excuse the political PAC and you expect Trump to just sit back and allow his wife to be attacked. Only a spineless man would sit back and let his wife get attacked without hitting back.
An "Anti Trump PAC" attacked Trumps wife. A disgusting act.
Trump attacks Cruz's wife Another disgusting act.
Again, 5 year old tactics.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
An "Anti Trump PAC" attacked Trumps wife. A disgusting act.
Who are these people behind this "anti-Trump" political PAC? Do they have any names? Do they have any connection to presidential candidates? What is the PAC's goal?
What does "anti Trump" actually mean? Does that mean their only political action is to slander Trump and his family? Is that even a political action?
Maybe Anderson Cooper should do a little digging into these questions instead of being a useful tool for these PAC's and assist in trying to take Trump down. Instead of only focusing on Trump's response to the antagonists, find out exactly who they are, why they attacked Trump's wife, and for what purpose? My bad, that would require honest journalism.
Logged
