Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Huge blow to the NYSafe Act!
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    New York State  ›  Huge blow to the NYSafe Act! Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 4 Guests

Huge blow to the NYSafe Act!  This thread currently has 2,852 views. |
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
BuckStrider
July 11, 2015, 5:08pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Of course, the legislature was circumvented, and what's even more shocking is 'Il Duce' Cuomo went behind his party's back!

Oh wait....It's not a shock. It just goes to show that everyone is in bed with everyone.

http://www.syracuse.com/state/.....mmunition_sales.html

Quoted Text
SYRACUSE, N.Y. -- Gov. Andrew Cuomo has agreed to suspend plans for background checks for ammunition sales in New York and allow internet sales of ammunition, changing part of the NY Safe Act, according to state Sen. James Seward.

The changes are part of a "memorandum of understanding" struck between senate Republicans and Cuomo, a Democrat, according to Seward. It wasn't immediately clear if Assembly Democrats backed the changes.




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message
Libertarian4life
July 12, 2015, 4:03am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Background checks are great.

And of course your personal data would be secure in the hands of or glorious leaders.


21 Million Social Security Numbers Stolen, Feds Say
Bipartisan calls begin for head of OPM to resign as a result of breach.
Stock image of a hacker working on a laptop.

The Office of Personnel Management says more than 19 million who had applied for background investigations were targeted.
Associated Press July 9, 2015 | 4:02 p.m. EDT + More

This story was last updated at 10:17 p.m.

By JACK GILLUM and JOSH LEDERMAN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hackers stole Social Security numbers, health histories and other highly sensitive data from more than 21 million people, the Obama administration said Thursday, acknowledging that the breach of U.S. government computer systems was far more severe than previously disclosed.

The scope of the data breach — believed to be the biggest in U.S. history — has grown dramatically since the government first disclosed earlier this year that hackers had gotten into the Office of Personnel Management's personnel database and stolen records for about 4.2 million people. Since then, the Obama administration has acknowledged a second, related breach of the systems housing private data that individuals submit during background investigations to obtain security clearances.
Large computer systems easy to hack
KMGH - Denver, CO

That second attack affected more than 19 million people who applied for clearances, as well as nearly 2 million of their spouses, housemates and others who never applied for security clearances, the administration said. Among the data the hackers stole: criminal, financial, health, employment and residency histories, as well as information about their families and acquaintances.

The new revelations drew indignation from members of Congress who have said the administration has not done enough to protect personal data in their systems, as well as calls for OPM Director Katherine Archuleta and her top deputies to resign. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican, said Archuleta and her aides had "consciously ignored the warnings and failed to correct these weaknesses."

"Such incompetence is inexcusable," Chaffetz said in a statement.

House Republican leaders — Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy and Whip Steve Scalise — also called for Archuleta's resignation. Boehner said President Barack Obama must "take a strong stand against incompetence."

Some Democrats weighed in against Archuleta as well. Virginia Sen. Mark Warner said, "It is time for her to step down, and I strongly urge the administration to choose new management with proven abilities to address a crisis of this magnitude with an appropriate sense of urgency and accountability."

Yet Archuleta insisted she would not step down. "I am committed to the work that I am doing," she said in a conference call with reporters. The White House, which had previously said Obama was confident in Archuleta's leadership, said there was no change in its position.

Archuleta said the hackers also obtained user names and passwords that prospective employees used to fill out their background investigation forms, as well as the contents of interviews conducted as part of those investigations. Yet the government insisted there were no indications that the hackers have used the data they stole.

Still, the government declined to say who was behind the attack.

Numerous U.S. lawmakers, including Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, have said China was behind the attack. But Michael Daniel, Obama's cybersecurity coordinator, said the government wasn't yet ready to say who was responsible.

"Just because we're not doing public attribution does not mean that we're not taking steps to deal with the matter," Daniel told reporters.

While officials would not point the finger at China, they acknowledged that the same party was responsible for both of the breaches, which took place in 2014 and early 2015. Investigators previously told The Associated Press that the U.S. government was increasingly confident that China's government, and not criminal hackers, was responsible for the extraordinary theft of personal information.

China has publicly denied involvement in the break-in.

The administration said it has stepped up its cybersecurity efforts by proposing new legislation, urging private industry to share more information about attacks and examining how the government conducts sensitive background investigations.

"Each and every one of us at OPM is committed to protecting the safety and the security of the info that is placed in our trust," Archuleta said. In early June, government employees received notice that OPM would offer credit-monitoring services and identity-theft insurance to those affected.

Meanwhile, the White House waited about a month before telling the public that hackers had stolen the personal information of millions of people associated with the government, people directly involved with the investigation told the AP last month.

FBI Director James Comey, in a briefing with reporters Thursday, described the scope of the OPM breach as "huge" and called it "a very big deal from a national-security perspective and a counterintelligence perspective."

"It's a treasure trove of information about everybody who has worked for, tried to work for, or works for the United States government," he said.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 28
BuckStrider
July 12, 2015, 7:57am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
I have ZERO problems conducting background checks for ANYONE who wants to own a firearm.

It is absolutely necessary to try and keep firearms out of the hands of those who are not allowed.

Your reference to the OPM incident is asinine.

Hackers are gonna hack and all of our info is out there anyway.




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 28
CICERO
July 12, 2015, 8:51am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider
I have ZERO problems conducting background checks for ANYONE who wants to own a firearm.

It is absolutely necessary to try and keep firearms out of the hands of those who are not allowed.

Your reference to the OPM incident is asinine.

Hackers are gonna hack and all of our info is out there anyway.


Question is.  Can hackers hack into data bases to find out WHO is purchasing guns based on who had firearm background checks?  That would be valuable information to organized crime selling guns to those who aren't allowed to have them.  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 28
Box A Rox
July 12, 2015, 9:21am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Question is.  Can hackers hack into data bases to find out WHO is purchasing guns based on who had firearm background checks?  That would be valuable information to organized crime selling guns to those who aren't allowed to have them.  


So, owning guns makes you a target of "organized crime".
  And I keep hearing that guns keep you safe!  


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 28
CICERO
July 12, 2015, 9:32am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


  And I keep hearing that guns keep you safe!  


They do...Especially when faced with the organized crime government creates through prohibition and black markets.  



Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 28
Box A Rox
July 12, 2015, 9:50am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


They do...Especially when faced with the organized crime government creates through prohibition and black markets.  



Cissy against Al Capone:


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 28
CICERO
July 12, 2015, 9:57am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Cissy against Al Capone:


Are you sure Al Capone said those words?  That sounds like the philosophy of every politician running for office.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 28
BuckStrider
July 12, 2015, 5:25pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Question is.  Can hackers hack into data bases to find out WHO is purchasing guns based on who had firearm background checks?  That would be valuable information to organized crime selling guns to those who aren't allowed to have them.  


LOL!!!

You think that some organized crime group is going to troll though some background database and find "Jim Smith" who couldn't buy a shotgun and call him?

"Pssst.....Hey Jim.....shhhhh.....I hear you're looking for a gun"

Be more worried about the guys collecting this info than the hackers.







"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 28
BuckStrider
July 12, 2015, 5:34pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Cissy against Al Capone:


Thing is Capone is right and if you look at this quote closely, it's just a variation of Roosevelt's 'Speak softly and carry a big stick'





"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 28
CICERO
July 12, 2015, 5:35pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider


LOL!!!

You think that some organized crime group is going to troll though some background database and find "Jim Smith" who couldn't buy a shotgun and call him?


Nah...I'm thinking they find the people that have 20 or 30 background checks, then rob them.  It would be helpful to find out where the guns are, not who to sell them to.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 28
Box A Rox
July 12, 2015, 5:42pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider


LOL!!!

You think that some organized crime group is going to troll though some background database and find "Jim Smith" who couldn't buy a shotgun and call him?

"Pssst.....Hey Jim.....shhhhh.....I hear you're looking for a gun"

Be more worried about the guys collecting this info than the hackers.


So if Cissy's "Organized Crime" group is looking for a reliable supply of AR's and Glocks...
they have to look no further than the GunHugger's list.

Some on this very board have disclosed that they have numerous weapons of this type.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 28
joebxr
July 12, 2015, 5:46pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


Nah...I'm thinking they find the people that have 20 or 30 background checks, then rob them.  It would be helpful to find out where the guns are, not who to sell them to.[/quote]

Hmmm...seems like you are denying what you said????
[quote=19]Question is.  Can hackers hack into data bases to find out WHO is purchasing guns based on who had firearm background checks?  That would be valuable information to organized crime selling guns to those who aren't allowed to have them.  



JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 28
CICERO
July 12, 2015, 6:49pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr



Denying nothing.  If the gun supply dries up, criminals will find where they are.  What better than a list of who has purchased them.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 28
CICERO
July 12, 2015, 6:51pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


So if Cissy's "Organized Crime" group is looking for a reliable supply of AR's and Glocks...
they have to look no further than the GunHugger's list.

Some on this very board have disclosed that they have numerous weapons of this type.


Agreed.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 28
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread