Quoted from joebxr

I asked of Bumbler with no reply, so I ask you:
If she refuses to issue license to gays, then is it alright for her to issue licenses
to transgender?  Or is it alright for her to issue licenses to divorced couples? Or
is it alright for her to pick and choose which facets of her religious beliefs
she gets to enforce?

Quoted from joebxr

Like I thought...BS answer.

Quoted from bumblethru

i believe that buckstrider and cicero and myself have already given our respond.

for me.....there should be NO LICENSE aka permission to get married.

grant them a certificate.....AFTER they get married....according to state laws.

and yes, religious freedoms are protected under the LAW.

you can't severe two masters.

Quoted from bumblethru

not a clear answer to cicero's question.
please clarify....k?

Quoted from joebxr

He answered my questions with BS and a question, no answers
(just like you)...DUH!  Was it that
hard for you to figure out?

Quoted from joebxr

Like I thought...BS answer.

Quoted from bumblethru

i think the point here is that there is no answer for an unconstitutional law....that really isn't even a law.

the clerk can't break a law that isn't even a law.

ya git what i mean?

Quoted from joebxr

Sorry, forgot you have a law degree that allows you to usurp the
law as directed through validation by SCOTUS. Love to see you
in action in the courtroom!
Never asked if you liked the law or not...asked you specific
question because IT IS THE LAW!
ya git what i mean?

Quoted from CICERO

Which LAW did the Federal Judge say the clerk violated?  Which law is the clerk usurping?

Quoted from CICERO

So do you support the federal government  incarcerating the Kentucky county clerk indefinitely if the Kentucky state legislature fails to remove her from office for not issuing marriage licenses?

Quoted from bumblethru

i find it hard to believe that folks are not questioning this 'unconstitutional' law.

the supreme court CAN NOT make laws!!!!

it is treason if they do.

and i don't care if it's about gay marriage or what color you must paint your house.....THEY DON'T HAVE THE POWER....PERIOD!!

Quoted Text

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"-These words, written above the main entrance
to the Supreme Court Building, express the ultimate responsibility of the Supreme Court
of the United States. The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and
controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States.
As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American
people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian
and interpreter of the Constitution.

Quoted Text

As the final arbiter of the law,

Quoted from bumblethru

EXACTLY....they can't MAKE laws.

Quoted Text

The movement to obtain civil marriage rights and benefits for same-sex couples in the United States began in the 1970s.[4] In the 1971 case Baker v. Nelson the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that denying marriage licenses to same-sex couples did not violate the U.S. Constitution. On appeal, the United States Supreme Court denied to hear the case, establishing it as a federal precedent as it came from mandatory appellate review. The issue did not become prominent in U.S. politics until the 1993 Hawaii Supreme Court decision in Baehr v. Lewin that declared that state's prohibition to be unconstitutional.[9]