Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
LET'S SCREW UP ANOTHER GENERATION
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  LET'S SCREW UP ANOTHER GENERATION Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 26 Guests

LET'S SCREW UP ANOTHER GENERATION  This thread currently has 237 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
senders
April 28, 2014, 3:32pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted Text
Idea of New Attention Disorder Spurs Research, and Debate
By ALAN SCHWARZAPRIL 11, 2014
Photo

Keith McBurnett, a scientist, said, “We haven’t even agreed on the symptom list” for sluggish cognitive tempo. Credit Jason Henry for The New York Times


With more than six million American children having received a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, concern has been rising that the condition is being significantly misdiagnosed and overtreated with prescription medications.

Yet now some powerful figures in mental health are claiming to have identified a new disorder that could vastly expand the ranks of young people treated for attention problems. Called sluggish cognitive tempo, the condition is said to be characterized by lethargy, daydreaming and slow mental processing. By some researchers’ estimates, it is present in perhaps two million children.

Experts pushing for more research into sluggish cognitive tempo say it is gaining momentum toward recognition as a legitimate disorder — and, as such, a candidate for pharmacological treatment. Some of the condition’s researchers have helped Eli Lilly investigate how its flagship A.D.H.D. drug might treat it.

Continue reading the main story
RELATED COVERAGE

“This is a concoction to justify the giving out of medication at unprecedented and unjustifiable levels,” Keith Conners, a psychologist and early advocate for recognition of A.D.H.D., said of the rising rates of diagnosis of the disorder.The Selling of Attention Deficit DisorderDEC. 14, 2013
The Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology devoted 136 pages of its January issue to papers describing the illness, with the lead paper claiming that the question of its existence “seems to be laid to rest as of this issue.” The psychologist Russell Barkley of the Medical University of South Carolina, for 30 years one of A.D.H.D.’s most influential and visible proponents, has claimed in research papers and lectures that sluggish cognitive tempo “has become the new attention disorder.”

In an interview, Keith McBurnett, a professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco, and co-author of several papers on sluggish cognitive tempo, said: “When you start talking about things like daydreaming, mind-wandering, those types of behaviors, someone who has a son or daughter who does this excessively says, ‘I know about this from my own experience.’ They know what you’re talking about.”

Yet some experts, including Dr. McBurnett and some members of the journal’s editorial board, say that there is no consensus on the new disorder’s specific symptoms, let alone scientific validity. They warn that the concept’s promotion without vastly more scientific rigor could expose children to unwarranted diagnoses and prescription medications — problems that A.D.H.D. already faces.

“We’re seeing a fad in evolution: Just as A.D.H.D. has been the diagnosis du jour for 15 years or so, this is the beginning of another,” said Dr. Allen Frances, an emeritus professor of psychiatry at Duke University. “This is a public health experiment on millions of kids.”

Though the concept of sluggish cognitive tempo, or S.C.T., has been researched sporadically since the 1980s, it has never been recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which codifies conditions recognized by the American Psychiatric Association. The editor in chief of The Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Charlotte Johnston, said in an email that recent renewed interest in the condition is what led the journal to devote most of one issue to “highlight areas in which further study is needed.”

Dr. Barkley declined repeated requests for interviews about his work and statements regarding sluggish cognitive tempo. Several of the field’s other key researchers, Stephen P. Becker of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Benjamin B. Lahey of the University of Chicago and Stephen A. Marshall of Ohio University, also declined to comment on their work.

Continue reading the main storyContinue reading the main story
Advertisement


Papers have proposed that a recognition of sluggish cognitive tempo could help resolve some longstanding confusion about A.D.H.D., which despite having hyperactivity in its name includes about two million children who are not hyperactive, merely inattentive. Some researchers propose that about half of those children would be better classified as having sluggish cognitive tempo, with perhaps one million additional children, who do not meet A.D.H.D.’s criteria now, having the new disorder, too.

“These children are not the ones giving adults much trouble, so they’re easy to miss,” Dr. McBurnett said. “They’re the daydreamy ones, the ones with work that’s not turned in, leaving names off of papers or skipping questions, things like that, that impinge on grades or performance. So anything we can do to understand what’s going on with these kids is a good thing.”

But Dr. McBurnett added that sluggish cognitive tempo remained many years from any scientific consensus: “We haven’t even agreed on the symptom list — that’s how early on we are in the process.”

Steve S. Lee, an associate professor of psychology at the University of California, Los Angeles, who serves on the editorial board of The Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, said in an interview that he was conflicted over the journal’s emphasis on sluggish cognitive tempo. He expressed concern that A.D.H.D. had already grown to encompass too many children with common youthful behavior, or whose problems are derived not from a neurological disorder but from inadequate sleep, a different learning disability or other sources.

About two-thirds of children with an A.D.H.D. diagnosis take daily medication such as Adderall or Concerta, which often quells severe impulsiveness and inattention but also carries risks for insomnia, appetite suppression and, among teenagers and adults, abuse or addiction.

Continue reading the main story
RECENT COMMENTS

JulieDole 15 days ago
What they're describing is just ADHD/PI, the "primarily inattentive" type. (The hyperactive type is ADHD.)And I can tell you that, while...
Michael 15 days ago
@ Sebastian re your son. Has he ever had an evaluation for sleep apnea? After watching some children squirm in their seats, play with...
almazul 15 days ago
OMG, this is the most ridiculous thing! When will people start considering the context?? ie., boring school, boring home, lack of nature,...
SEE ALL COMMENTS
“The scientist part of me says we need to pursue knowledge, but we know that people will start saying their kids have it, and doctors will start diagnosing it and prescribing for it long before we know whether it’s real,” Dr. Lee said. “A.D.H.D. has become a public health, societal question, and it’s a fair question to ask of S.C.T. We better pump the brakes more diligently.”

Dr. McBurnett recently conducted a clinical trial funded and overseen by Eli Lilly that investigated whether proposed symptoms of sluggish cognitive tempo could be treated with Strattera, the company’s primary A.D.H.D. drug. (One of Strattera’s selling points is that it is not a stimulant like Adderall and Concerta, medications more susceptible to abuse.) His study, published in The Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, concluded, “This is the first study to report significant effects of any medication on S.C.T.”

An Eli Lilly spokeswoman said in an email, “Sluggish cognitive tempo is one of many conditions that Lilly scientists continue to study to help satisfy unmet medical needs around the world.”

Representatives of the drug companies that make the best-selling medications for A.D.H.D. — Shire (extended-release Adderall and Vyvanse), Novartis (Focalin) and Janssen (Concerta) — said they are not currently conducting research into sluggish cognitive tempo. However, because the new condition shares so many symptoms with A.D.H.D., these products might easily be repositioned to serve the new market.

Dr. Barkley, who has said that “S.C.T. is a newly recognized disorder,” also has financial ties to Eli Lilly; he received $118,000 from 2009 to 2012 for consulting and speaking engagements, according to propublica.org. While detailing sluggish cognitive tempo in The Journal of Psychiatric Practice, Dr. Barkley stated that Strattera’s performance on sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms was “an exciting finding.” Dr. Barkley has also published a symptom checklist for mental health professionals to identify adults with the condition; the forms are available for $131.75 apiece from Guilford Press, which funds some of his research.

Dr. Barkley, who edits sluggish cognitive tempo’s Wikipedia page, declined a request to discuss his financial interests in the condition’s acceptance.

“I have no doubt there are kids who meet the criteria for this thing, but nothing is more irrelevant,” Dr. Frances said. “The enthusiasts here are thinking of missed patients. What about the mislabeled kids who are called patients when there’s nothing wrong with them? They are not considering what is happening in the real world.”

Correction: April 15, 2014
An article on Saturday about the debate surrounding the idea of a new attention disorder, sluggish cognitive tempo, misidentified the institution with which one researcher of the disorder, Stephen A. Marshall, is affiliated. It is Ohio University, not Miami University in Ohio. The article also misspelled the given name of another researcher. He is Stephen P. Becker, not Steven.



http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04.....and-debate.html?_r=1


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message
senders
May 6, 2014, 5:24pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted Text
9-Year-Old Girl In Bathing Suit Handcuffed, Arrested By Two Officers
BY CARIMAH TOWNES MAY 6, 2014 AT 12:00 PM UPDATED: MAY 6, 2014 AT 1:49 PM
facebook icon 3,159Share This   twitter icon 201Tweet This   google plus icon   email icon "9-Year-Old Girl In Bathing Suit Handcuffed, Arrested By Two Officers" Share:  facebook icon  twitter icon  google plus icon Share on email
shutterstock_46269745
CREDIT: SHUTTERSTOCK
As the Oregonian reported, residents in Portland’s New Columbia community are calling for reform of a policy that allowed two officers to take a nine-year-old girl into custody without a juvenile court order last year. The girl — who was wearing a wet bathing suit, flip flops, and a towel — was handcuffed, fingerprinted, and photographed without a trusted adult present.
The arrest came after the nine-year-old fought another girl at a local Boys & Girls Club. Staff who broke up the fight found no “obvious” injuries, but suspended the nine-year-old from the club for one week. Police became involved after the mother of the second girl reported the fight and claimed the nine-year-old slammed her daughter’s head into a brick wall.
Officers David McCarthy and Matthew Huspek confronted the nine-year-old child on her front porch six days later. According to the girl’s mother, Latoya Harris, “They repeatedly asked her, ‘Why don’t you tell me what really happened?’” After questioning, the officers handcuffed and drove the girl to the police department, accusing her of fourth degree assault, or “intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes physical injury to another.”
The policemen refused to let Harris accompany her daughter.
“I observed (her) breathing speed up, she looked down at the ground … crossed her arms and would eventually answer my questions,” McCarthy wrote in his report. The officers also claimed her responses were “inconsistent” with witness accounts. But charges were never brought against the juvenile. And after Harris filed a police complaint for the aggressive treatment of her daughter, an oversight group, the Independent Police Review Division, found no wrongdoing.
Last month, Harris brought her complaint to a local panel tasked with hearing complaints about Portland police misconduct, the Citizen Review Committee. And the ordeal has drawn the support from youth justice advocates, including Youth, Rights & Justice, a law firm that represents juveniles in court. With the help of the panel, advocates want a city ordinance altered so that children under the age of 10 cannot be taken into custody without a juvenile court order.
The criminalization of children for this sort of minor offense remains a prevalent trend nationwide. In the so-called school-to-prison pipeline, for instance, schools across the country increasingly rely on police for handling disciplinary action.


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 4
sanfordy2
May 6, 2014, 6:29pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,089
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+5 / -0
Time Online
89 days 15 hours 56 minutes
maybe they need something to do with the war on drugs winding down? what a sad bunch  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 4
senders
May 6, 2014, 7:52pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from sanfordy2
maybe they need something to do with the war on drugs winding down? what a sad bunch  


no,,,,,it's insidious and worse than that.......


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 4
senders
May 6, 2014, 7:57pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
we're all worried about global warming and climate change....how about the change in human views regarding other humans
regarding the least explored and learned space of a human being called the human psyche/spirit....

dirty dirty dirty shame.....

we talk about how people don't have food/water/housing etc...why? because they are the FU(KING  basics of human existence and
yet not the most important part......

we complain and have commercials about the 'poor stupid people' of other countries starving and yet fail to realize our demise
of our future generations and the robbery of their own sovereign humanness.....

what a sham.......

talk about corrupt government and big business...now we have that all saving national healthcare/insurance to keep all on
'tract'....

FU(K THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

wake up Box and Friends.... or are you too old to realize the 'greenhouse psyche' your generation has left behind...


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 4
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread