Read the article again...The state said the donor violated the law by not having the specimen tested. I said(listen closely) IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE WOMAN RECIEVING THE SPECIMEN TO HAVE IT TESTED BEFORE PUTTING IT INTO HER BODY. (I know, that's a crazy concept)
A woman has a right to their body - except when they decide to put a strangers bodily fluids into it, now it needs to be regulated. Bizzare.
Well once again, you "adjust" things for your benefit... although the physician would have done the testing, the state said
Quoted Text
failed to conform to Kansas law, which says a licensed physician must be involved in an artificial insemination process
not that he didn't have the specimen tested....geeeezz, can't you read?
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Corrections? Your corrections abdicated the personal responsibility of the recipient. The recipient entered into a contract without verifying the specimen. Whose fault is that?
Man, is everybody a victim of their own ignorance?
Try having someone read and interpret the words for you because you are not getting it!!!! GEEEZZZ! Get help, will ya'!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Yeah, I read your post that referenced the specimen testing from the section of the article that wasn't in the original post.
Are you just cutting and pasting random sentences of the article?
OHHHH, it wasn't in the post but was in the article along with a lot more writing...so that makes it invalid in your feeble mind????? You made comments, and I cut and paste the pertinent information to show you what was said instead of what you wanted it to say!!!! Poor Cissyboy, can't handle reading things unless it's posted for him!!!!
PS - Your post was wrong...bottom line, but you aren't man enough to own up! So you attack from a different direction AS USUAL!!!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Can't ANYONE in this forum carry on a civilized adult conversation??
You act like a group of 3 year olds.
We are advised NOT to judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works.
Can't ANYONE in this forum carry on a civilized adult conversation??
You act like a group of 3 year olds.
Interesting opinion....certain people (and you have already seen who they are) like to distort and twist words and truth, all to forward their agenda. I for one refuse to sit back and not point out the truth as opposed to their fabrications.
If that offends you and is in your opinion childish acts, then so be it! You are also free to ignore the posts.
Sorry, that's just MHO!!!!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
OHHHH, it wasn't in the post but was in the article along with a lot more writing...so that makes it invalid in your feeble mind????? You made comments, and I cut and paste the pertinent information to show you what was said instead of what you wanted it to say!!!! Poor Cissyboy, can't handle reading things unless it's posted for him!!!!
PS - Your post was wrong...bottom line, but you aren't man enough to own up! So you attack from a different direction AS USUAL!!!
Blahh...Blahh...Blahh...
What was the point of posting the specimen test? What did that have to do with anything? You still haven't expanded on your random cut and paste. Was that post to support the judge’s ruling on state regulations of sperm donation? You never finish your arguments.
Man, still, after all this time...You can't formulate a coherent argument. You are the random poster.
This forum doesn't have the "ignore poster" button..sometimes, I wish it did, but then again, it would be a pretty quiet place.
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
This forum doesn't have the "ignore poster" button..sometimes, I wish it did, but then again, it would be a pretty quiet place.
Political segregation
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Can't ANYONE in this forum carry on a civilized adult conversation??
You act like a group of 3 year olds.
Some on this board have trouble formulating simple premise-conclusion arguments. Then when a person challenges their disjointed posts, and realize they are incapable of a logical response, then they go into meltdown mode and start spitting and sputtering and ranting.
When you challenge some of the members set beliefs, their brains go haywire and start the name calling. And God forbid, DO NOT QUESTION THE HONOR OF MILILTARY SERVICE OR WAR. YOU WILL BE IMMEDIATELLY LABELLED ANTI-AMERICAN.
What was the point of posting the specimen test? What did that have to do with anything? You still haven't expanded on your random cut and paste. Was that post to support the judge’s ruling on state regulations of sperm donation? You never finish your arguments.
Man, still, after all this time...You can't formulate a coherent argument. You are the random poster.
Well since you are incapable of following threads from start to end, let me try and answer your questions:
(1) "What was the point of posting the specimen test? What did that have to do with anything? " L4L stated "The contract is void because they didn't pay a government licensed doctor to squirt the turkey baster? They forgot that only government authorized physicians may assist with insemination." So I posted what a physician would be required to do in a case of insemination, showing it had nothing to do with use of a Turkey baster or your almighty Government control. and you stated "The state said the donor violated the law by not having the specimen tested." So I posted "failed to conform to Kansas law, which says a licensed physician must be involved in an artificial insemination process" and "not that he didn't have the specimen tested" to correct your falsehood (2) "You still haven't expanded on your random cut and paste" and I fully responded "...it wasn't in the post but was in the article along with a lot more writing... You made comments, and I cut and paste the pertinent information to show you what was said instead of what you wanted it to say!!!! "
There was no argument to expand on, as I made no argument, I only Corrected YOU, which we all know you hate. Someone doesn't play into Cissyboy's hand, they are bad, bad, bad!!!!
So now I've explained it all to you, but I still can't understand it for you!!!!!!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
I said(listen closely) IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE WOMAN RECEIVING THE SPECIMEN TO HAVE IT TESTED BEFORE PUTTING IT INTO HER BODY.
A woman has a right to their body - except when they decide to put a strangers bodily fluids into it,NOW IT NEEDS TO BE REGULATED!
Again I say YET AGAIN!!! TWICE IN ONE THREAD!!! CICERO IS CALLING FOR GOVT REGULATION AND TESTING BY GOVERNMENT PHYSICIANS!!!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Logged
