|
joebxr |
November 18, 2013, 1:17pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
and BUMBLER continues to avoid supporting his fabrications and falsehoods!!!! |
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Box A Rox |
November 18, 2013, 1:21pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
|
and BUMBLER continues to avoid supporting his fabrications and falsehoods!!!!
Yup! It's not very complicated. Either Bumbler thinks his post is accurate or he sees that it's a lie...Again, I ask:
So Bumbler, is your poster accurate or not??? Is your post what Feinstein said or not???
|
| The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
|
|
|
|
|
joebxr |
November 18, 2013, 1:27pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
Bumbler forgot to include this statement from Connelly in the post he put up:
Quoted Text
How would you feel if you received a letter from the U.S. Government informing you that because of a physical or mental condition that the government says you have it is proposing to rule that you are incompetent to handle your own financial affairs?
Seems like this one sentence was not valuable to Bumbler trying to make it into a blanket denial for ALL VETERANS!!!! |
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
CICERO |
November 18, 2013, 1:40pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
|
I read the bill and all the articles, and that was not the issue about what you posted...and you know that! OKAY, I give...you are spinning everything around to cover up that what you posted was interpretation and I have no energy to play your game. I could just sit here and agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong!
Not spinning at all. You are looking for someone to post Feinstein's specific quote calling all veterans mentally ill. It was her refusal to grant the same exemption she is willing to grant to retired law enforcement, and the premise to her argument for not granting the exemption to vets was PTSD. So if the assault weapons ban was passed, ALL veterans would be banned, while ALL retired law enforcement would be exempt. If you or any other veteran wanted to bu an AR15, you would be denied, while your retired town cop wouldn't. Her reasoning? Returning Iraq vets with PTSD. It doesn't matter that you are a Vietnam vet not suffering with PTSD, all vets are banned, just like the rest of the civilian population. |
| |
|
|
|
|
joebxr |
November 18, 2013, 1:44pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
"If you or any other veteran wanted to buy (a gun), you would be denied" "all vets are banned" IT DOESN'T SAY THAT!!!
Notice I substituted "gun"...simply because an AR15 is considered and assault weapon and ability to purchase them has nothing to do with being a Vet! |
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
CICERO |
November 18, 2013, 3:06pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
|
"If you or any other veteran wanted to buy (a gun), you would be denied" "all vets are banned" IT DOESN'T SAY THAT!!!
Notice I substituted "gun"...simply because an AR15 is considered and assault weapon and ability to purchase them has nothing to do with being a Vet!
I said that. I clearly stated that a retired cop can possess weapons in the ban which a veteran cannot. Even though veterans have the same if not more training with that type of weapon than law enforcement. It has all to do with vets, because it was vets requesting the same exemption. What reason should veterans be declined the exemption? They are properly trained to use them safely. Why not give them the same access as retired law enforcement? |
| |
|
|
|
|
Box A Rox |
November 18, 2013, 3:11pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
|
Quoted Text
Q: Did Sen. Dianne Feinstein say all military veterans are mentally ill and should not be allowed to own guns? A: No. She said veterans should not be exempt from her proposed assault weapons ban, citing post-traumatic stress disorder as a concern. She did not say all veterans suffer from PTSD or that all veterans should not own guns.
Factcheck.org http://www.factcheck.org/2013/04/twisting-feinsteins-words-on-military-vets/ |
| The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
|
|
|
|
|
joebxr |
November 18, 2013, 3:23pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
I said that. I clearly stated that a retired cop can possess weapons in the ban which a veteran cannot. Even though veterans have the same if not more training with that type of weapon than law enforcement. It has all to do with vets, because it was vets requesting the same exemption. What reason should veterans be declined the exemption? They are properly trained to use them safely. Why not give them the same access as retired law enforcement?
I give up...I can keep trying to explain it all to
you, but I simply can't understand it for you too! |
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Libertarian4life |
November 18, 2013, 3:28pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Libertarian4life |
November 18, 2013, 3:31pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
|
Please provide a link to prove your claim, because as I posted, "Senator Feinstein stated neither that "all vets are mentally ill" nor that "the government should prevent [veterans] from owning firearms";", and I find NOWHERE that she makes the statement you claim!!!!
Fienstien quote: SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN: If I understand this, this adds an exemption of retired military. As I understand our bill, no issue has arose in this regard during the 10 years the expired ban was in effect and what we did in the other bill was exempt possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States. So that included active military. The problem with expanding this is that, you know, with the advent of PTSD, which I think is a new phenomenon as a product of the Iraq War, it’s not clear how the seller or transferrer of a firearm covered by this bill would verify that an individual was a member, or a veteran, and that there was no impairment of that individual with respect to having a weapon like this.So, you know, I would be happy to sit down with you again and see if we could work something out but I think we have to-- if you’re going to do this, find a way that veterans who are incapacitated for one reason or another mentally don’t have access to this kind of weapon. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Libertarian4life |
November 18, 2013, 3:41pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
|
Quoting politicians isn't hate.
Hating me is. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
joebxr |
November 18, 2013, 3:54pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
Quoting politicians isn't hate.
Hating me is.
Interpreting statements and posting as if they actually are quotes is the issue!!! Yah, I hate that because it is misleading falsehoods. Didn't say I hate you...simply called you for what you are: IGNORANT HATER! You are clear on that and display it constantly ...I G N O R A N T H A T E R !!!and you wear it proud! |
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Libertarian4life |
November 18, 2013, 4:10pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
|
Didn't say I hate you...simply called you for what you are: IGNORANT HATER!
You are clear on that and display it constantly...I G N O R A N T H A T E R !!!
I never said I hate the military.
Now you claim you never said that you hate me.
Unless you can produce my words saying I hate the military, then you are the ignorant accuser.
Feel free to post where I ever said that I hate anyone.
You just keep posting your venom directing it at me calling me the hater.
In reality, where you don't happen to reside, you are the ignorant accuser.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Libertarian4life |
November 18, 2013, 4:13pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
|
Interpreting statements and posting as if they actually are quotes
is the issue!!! Yah, I hate ...
You just admitted being hateful.And since reality still fails to elude your comprehension, I again post Feinstein's actual quoted words from the hearing on the proposed bill: Fienstien quote: SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN: If I understand this, this adds an exemption of retired military. As I understand our bill, no issue has arose in this regard during the 10 years the expired ban was in effect and what we did in the other bill was exempt possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States. So that included active military. The problem with expanding this is that, you know, with the advent of PTSD, which I think is a new phenomenon as a product of the Iraq War, it’s not clear how the seller or transferrer of a firearm covered by this bill would verify that an individual was a member, or a veteran, and that there was no impairment of that individual with respect to having a weapon like this. So, you know, I would be happy to sit down with you again and see if we could work something out but I think we have to-- if you’re going to do this, find a way that veterans who are incapacitated for one reason or another mentally don’t have access to this kind of weapon. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
joebxr |
November 18, 2013, 4:33pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
I never said I hate the military.
Now you claim you never said that you hate me.
Unless you can produce my words saying I hate the military, then you are the ignorant accuser.
Feel free to post where I ever said that I hate anyone.
You just keep posting your venom directing it at me calling me the hater.
In reality, where you don't happen to reside, you are the ignorant accuser.
You hate Veterans (maybe specifically Vietnam Veterans)....admitting to being a person that would
spit on a Veteran is an act of hatred...of course you are too ignorant to understand that!!!! |
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|