Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
US Gave Saddam WMD's
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    What's Going On In The Rest Of The world  ›  US Gave Saddam WMD's Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 66 Guests

US Gave Saddam WMD's  This thread currently has 999 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Box A Rox
August 26, 2013, 7:30am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Ronald Reagan Gave Saddam Hussein WMD'S!

As I've posted countless times on this board (yet some still don't believe it) Saddam got his chemical
weapons and the means to produce them in Iraq from the USA, specifically from  Donald Rumsfeld
and Ronny The ReyGun.

The USA under Reagan wanted them used on Iran and the Iran Iraq war was the perfect place to
use them on Iran through their "man in Baghdad" Saddam Hussein.

These are the same chemical weapons used against the Kurds.
The reason G Worst Bush KNEW that Iraq had WMD's is because their own Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld gave them to Saddam.

Once it was apparent that the US was going to war if Iraq didn't give up their WMD's,  Saddam
complied with the UN Weapons inspections and destroyed their entire Chemical Weapons
stockpile and manufacturing capability, thereby eliminating the reason for an invasion by the USA.

Remember the UN weapons inspectors saying there were no WMD's in Iraq?
Remember G Worst Bush saying that Iraq had WMD's... "Slam Dunk".
Remember The RUMMY saying we KNOW Iraq has WMD's and we know where they are?

It was all a scam... a US Grab for Iraqi oil... that failed miserably.
(Meanwhile, Osama Bin Laden, walked out of Afghanistan into Pakistan, still in control of Al Qaeda)


Foreign Policy
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/a.....am_as_he_gassed_iran




The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message
Box A Rox
August 26, 2013, 8:03am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 13
CICERO
August 26, 2013, 8:39am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Where's the Clinton or Obama DOJ prosecution?  I thought the two party system prevented this type of illegal action taken in the name of the American people?  The democrat majority in Congress during the 80's couldn't stop it?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 13
Box A Rox
August 26, 2013, 8:53am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
Where's the Clinton or Obama DOJ prosecution?  I thought the two party system prevented this type of illegal action taken in the name of the American people?  The democrat majority in Congress during the 80's couldn't stop it?


If you remember the US Congress is in charge of Impeachment, and the Congress was very busy with
much more important things when the Republicans Impeached Bill for sharing a cigar with Monica.  MUCH
MORE IMPORTANT THAN WAR CRIMES!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 13
CICERO
August 26, 2013, 9:21am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


If you remember the US Congress is in charge of Impeachment, and the Congress was very busy with
much more important things when the Republicans Impeached Bill for sharing a cigar with Monica.  MUCH
MORE IMPORTANT THAN WAR CRIMES!


During the 80's?  I don't remember that.  

So you are saying the legislative and judicial branch have no check on executive abuse?  Hmmmmm...Interesting.  Make sure you go vote!


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 13
Box A Rox
August 26, 2013, 9:52am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
Where's the Clinton or Obama DOJ prosecution?  


Quoted from CICERO

During the 80's?  I don't remember that.  

Bill Clinton was a governor of Arkansas in the 80's.  



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 13
CICERO
August 26, 2013, 10:08am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox



Bill Clinton was a governor of Arkansas in the 80's.  



He was the pres in 92, he could have prosecuted his predecessor for selling chemical weapons to Saddam.  Or i'm sure the Senate and House majority leader(which were democrats) could have taken some legal action to stop executive abuse.  You know checks and balances.  The two party system, you know...where one party acts illegally, and the opposition party acts outraged, then grants immunity to the people who committed these criminal acts.  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 13
BuckStrider
August 26, 2013, 1:18pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox



From Boxy the Robot

Quoted Text
It's not unusual for US officials to meet with Democratically Elected Heads of State...


Now, Boxy will come out and say that Saddam wasn't elected and I will retort that neither was Mao, Stalin, Brezhnev. or the house of Saud.

IIRC Obama said that he wanted to meet unconditionally with the leaders of Iran, Cuba and Venezuela.

Boxy can't accept the fact that Obama is a total failure when it comes to foreign policy, so he has to recycle again and again and again some crap that happened damn near 30 years ago.

So, in conclusion, what does Boxy's OP, Regan, and Saddam have in common?

Oh right, they are all dead.




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 13
Box A Rox
August 26, 2013, 1:52pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider

From Boxy the Robot
Now, Boxy will come out and say that Saddam wasn't elected and I will retort that neither was Mao, Stalin, Brezhnev. or the house of Saud.
IIRC Obama said that he wanted to meet unconditionally with the leaders of Iran, Cuba and Venezuela.
Boxy can't accept the fact that Obama is a total failure when it comes to foreign policy, so he has to recycle again and again and again some crap that happened damn near 30 years ago.
So, in conclusion, what does Boxy's OP, Regan, and Saddam have in common?
Oh right, they are all dead.


Bucky The Dunce!  

I have no problem with US Presidents meeting with world leaders... I just wish this meeting were
about constructive LEGAL topics... not about how to scam the US Public by giving Iraq chemical
weapons through third parties so that The Rummy could claim that he had no knowledge of the
event.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 13
BuckStrider
August 26, 2013, 3:28pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Bucky The Dunce!  

I have no problem with US Presidents meeting with world leaders... I just wish this meeting were
about constructive LEGAL topics... not about how to scam the US Public by giving Iraq chemical
weapons through third parties so that The Rummy could claim that he had no knowledge of the
event.


Because it has never happened right?

Nobody gives a crap about it now, just like nobody gives a crap that we gave the Soviets weapons, technology and tactics during WW2 to fight the Germans

'The enemy of my enemy is my friend'

I'm sure you'll be the first one opening up the thread and slamming your 'god' Obama when it comes to light that that the U.S was smuggling weapons to Syrians via Libya





"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 13
Box A Rox
August 26, 2013, 3:38pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider

Because it has never happened right?
Nobody gives a crap about it now, just like nobody gives a crap that we gave the Soviets weapons, technology and tactics during WW2 to fight the Germans
'The enemy of my enemy is my friend'
I'm sure you'll be the first one opening up the thread and slamming your 'god' Obama when it comes to light that that the U.S was smuggling weapons to Syrians via Libya


YUP.  If Obama supplied these chemical weapons to Syria, then Obama is at least partly responsible for
their use.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 13
BuckStrider
August 26, 2013, 5:09pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


YUP.  If Obama supplied these chemical weapons to Syria, then Obama is at least partly responsible for
their use.


Yeah right, we'll see what tune you play when Obama orders our military to start striking ground targets in Syria.

Oh and FYI, unlike Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq, Syria actually has a fairly formidable air defense network.

Would really suck, if by some chance, they shot down a F-22 or a B-2.  




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 13
Box A Rox
August 26, 2013, 5:14pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider

Yeah right, we'll see what tune you play when Obama orders our military to start striking ground targets in Syria.
Oh and FYI, unlike Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq, Syria actually has a fairly formidable air defense network.
Would really suck, if by some chance, they shot down a F-22 or a B-2.  


Bucky seems to have some unfulfilled dream of a disaster in Syria.  I hope this thing can end
peacefully but at this stage it's unlikely.  

Buck... exactly what do you 'assume' that my position on Syria is?  Do you have some undisclosed
information about my opinion on the issue???

You seem to be setting up some kind of "HA TOLD YA SO" moment... but I have no idea why.

IMO, the best case scenario is that WMD's are taken off the table without further escalating the war
or involving US troops.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 13
A Better Rotterdam
August 26, 2013, 8:30pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
903
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+6 / -4
Time Online
38 days 7 hours 17 minutes
It's quite obvious Regean did this, but with that said, Clinton and Obama probably would have done the same thing, and throw in Bush too.... Wake up the two parties are one, for real!
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 13
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread