Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Criminals continue to ignore gun laws - Providence
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    ....And In The Rest Of The Country  ›  Criminals continue to ignore gun laws - Providence Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 60 Guests

Criminals continue to ignore gun laws - Providence  This thread currently has 1,052 views. |
3 Pages 1 2 3 » Recommend Thread
Libertarian4life
January 17, 2013, 2:53pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Several arrested in Prov shooting overnight
Police still determining charges

Updated: Thursday, 17 Jan 2013, 12:58 PM EST
Published : Thursday, 17 Jan 2013, 6:44 AM EST

    By Shaun Towne
    Update by Nancy Krause

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) -- One person was shot in the leg during an exchange of gunfire in Providence overnight.

The incident occurred just before 1 a.m. near the intersection of Friendship and Richmond Streets.

After receiving a description of the suspect vehicle, Commander Thomas Oates said officers pulled over a car a few blocks away on Broad St. The seven people inside, some of them from Lynn, Massachusetts, were then taken into custody.

Oates said officers also found a .40 caliber pistol with obliterated serial numbers in the car.

While there was no shooting victim at the Providence scene, Oates said investigators received a call from police in Salem, Mass., who reported a 20-year-old man was being treated for a gunshot wound to the leg in an emergency room in Lynn.

Oates said the victim was uncooperative with police.

After being questioned by Providence investigators, some of those arrested on Broad St. were released. Oates said others were held on warrants.

He said multiple shell casings were found at the Providence scene and that those casings could be from three different guns, suggesting an exchange of gunfire took place.

Oates said charges will be filed in the overnight incident.
Logged
Private Message
Libertarian4life
January 17, 2013, 3:50pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Illegal gun attacks speeding vehicle

Shooting suspect arrested after returning to crime scene with gun in waistband
01/16/2013 2:40 PM     


A New Bedford man changed his clothes before he returned to the scene of a shooting where police were looking for him, but apparently didn’t think to remove the .45-caliber Smith and Wesson handgun from his waistband, police said.

New Bedford detectives arrested Okee Rodriquez Tuesday on illegal gun possession charges when witnesses pointed him out as the person who fired multiple times into a speeding white car, police said in a statement.

Police said it was not known if Rodriquez hit the white car, but they did find seven spent shell casings from a .45-caliber handgun near a car parked near Tinkham and Church streets.

While police were still at the scene, Rodriquez showed up and was quickly recognized as a shooting suspect by detectives, police said. When officers took him into custody, they performed a standard patdown of Rodriquez, police said.

Stuffed into his waistband was the .45-caliber pistol, which was seized by officers.

Rodriquez is to be arraigned today in New Bedford District Court on charges of unlawfully carrying a firearm, discharging a firearm within 500 feet of a dwelling, carrying a loaded firearm, possession of a firearm with obliterated serial numbers, and malicious destruction of personal property.
Todd Feathers can be reached at todd.feathers@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter at
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 32
Libertarian4life
January 20, 2013, 5:16pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Man accused of murder after shooting victim dies; brother also injured

Published: January 20, 2013 Updated 4 minutes ago

By MARY PEREZ — meperez@sunherald.com

PASCAGOULA - Police have arrested a Pascagoula man in connection with a shooting of two brothers early Sunday
morning outside the Progressive Club on Convent Avenue.

Adrian Orville Moore of School Avenue was arrested today when Pascagoula Police executed a search and arrest
warrant at his home.

Moore was charged with murder and aggravated assault after Hardy Parker, Jr., 51, died from gun shot wounds.
Parker's brother, Alfred Durden Jr., 46, is listed in stable condition at Singing River Hospital.

Police said he was taken into custody without incident after police said he was identified by the shooting victims as
the person who assaulted them.

He is being held in the Pascagoula Jail and is awaiting an initial appearance before Judge Michael Fondren.

Moore is out on bond from a July 2002 aggravated assault charge.

The shooting occured at 7:24 a.m. Saturday outside the Progressive Club, which police said has been closed for years.

The victims are both from Pascagoula.

One of the brothers called 911 at 1:20 a.m. Saturday. Pascagoula Police responded and found a man standing near
Convent Avenue at Pascagoula Street, bleeding from an apparent gunshot wound.

The man told police he and his brother were walking on the east side of the Progressive Club when an assailant
approached them and began shooting.

The brothers were transported to Singing River Hospital by Acadian Ambulance.

Anyone with information regarding this incident is asked to call the Pascagoula Police Department at 762-2211 or
Crimestopper at 1-877-787-5898.

Read more: http://www.sunherald.com/2013/01/20/4417113/police-arrest-pascagoula-man-accused.html#storylink=cpy
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 32
joebxr
January 20, 2013, 5:20pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted Text
Criminals continue to ignore gun laws

So is anyone that ignores gun laws a criminal?


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 32
senders
January 20, 2013, 5:23pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

So is anyone that ignores gun laws a criminal?


right from birth---if they make it that far


Quoted Text
"The Unforgiven"

New blood joins this earth
And quikly he's subdued
Through constant pained disgrace
The young boy learns their rules

With time the child draws in
This whipping boy done wrong
Deprived of all his thoughts
The young man struggles on and on he's known
A vow unto his own
That never from this day
His will they'll take away

What I've felt
What I've known
Never shined through in what I've shown
Never be
Never see
Won't see what might have been

What I've felt
What I've known
Never shined through in what I've shown
Never free
Never me
So I dub thee unforgiven

They dedicate their lives
To running all of his
He tries to please them all
This bitter man he is
Throughout his life the same
He's battled constantly
This fight he cannot win
A tired man they see no longer cares
The old man then prepares
To die regretfully
That old man here is me

What I've felt
What I've known
Never shined through in what I've shown
Never be
Never see
Won't see what might have been

What I've felt
What I've known
Never shined through in what I've shown
Never free
Never me
So I dub the unforgiven

You labeled me
I'll label you
So I dub the unforgiven



...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 32
Libertarian4life
January 20, 2013, 5:41pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

So is anyone that ignores gun laws a criminal?


This really sounds like a trick question but I'm going to say, y...

Nope!


Unconstitutional laws are not legal laws. Any person may disregard any unconstitutional law.

And yes, the constitutionality is decided by each citizen.

Police may believe differently, leading  to arrest, lawsuits, rights violations claims, etc.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 32
joebxr
January 20, 2013, 5:52pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted Text
Unconstitutional laws are not legal laws. Any person may disregard any unconstitutional law.

Really, show me where this is written and defensible.
Quoted Text
And yes, the constitutionality is decided by each citizen.

Really, show me where this is written and defensible.


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 32
Libertarian4life
January 20, 2013, 6:17pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from joebxr

Really, show me where this is written and defensible.

Really, show me where this is written and defensible.


Sure, it's called the Constitution.

    The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law
constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to
be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid;
one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

    The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality
no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of
it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal
contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it
purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

    Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no
rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no
acts performed under it.....

    A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to s
upersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the
land, it is superseded thereby.


    No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.

http://www.constitution.org

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Alabama Sheriff Joins Those Refusing To Enforce Unconstitutional Gun Laws

January 17, 2013

A sweeping set of gun control proposals laid out by President Obama on Wednesday is adding more fuel to a growing
national debate, and one local lawman is raising concerns that the proposed legislation is unconstitutional.

Madison County Sheriff Blake Dorning told WHNT News 19 that his office will not enforce new gun control legislation if
he feels those laws violate the Second Amendment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sheriffs will not enforce Obama gun control laws; List reasons for defiance

    Civil Liberties
    January 19, 2013


A growing number of sheriffs will not enforce President Obama's gun control proposals, should they become law.


In the past 24 hours, sheriffs in Arizona, California and Colorado have publicly and explicitly stated that they
will not enforce proposed federal gun control laws sought by President Obama. Speaking directly to the President's
Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2013 proposals, these sheriffs have made their support of Second Amendment rights
unequivocally clear:


    El Dorado County, California Sheriff John D’Agostini, according to local news station KRNV on Jan. 19,
2013 ("The purpose of this letter is to go on record of re-affirming my oath of office and making it clear that I
and my staff will never violate [our oath of office] by being pressured into enforcing any unconstitutional provision,
law or executive order.");
    Fresno County, California Sheriff Margaret Mims, according to local news station KFSN on Jan. 18, 2013
("So I have sent a letter to the White House saying I will not enforce any unconstitutional gun control laws.");
    Yavapai, Arizona Sheriff Scott Mascher, according to a Jan. 18, 2013 internal Sheriff memorandum published
by media outlet Reason ("As Sheriff, I refuse to participate or cooperate with any unconstitutional order that will
infringe upon our 2nd amendment rights."); and
    Larimer County, Colorado Sheriff Justin Smith, according local television station KWGN, also on Jan. 18, 2013
("As Sheriff, I will not: Enforce unconstitutional federal laws; Obey unconstitutional laws; Allow others to violate the
Constitutional Rights of those in my county.")

This brings the total, verified number of sheriffs who have specifically pledged not enforce President Obama's
proposed federal gun laws to 39
. To a person, they consider President Obama's current gun control proposals
unconstitutional and an illegal infringement of Second Amendment rights. We provide that list to you below. The
sheriffs on the list have made their comments after the President officially announced his proposals on Wednesday,
Jan. 16, 2013. This list does not include sheriffs who have voiced general opposition to gun control or who have
made their statements before the President's official Jan. 16, 2013 proposals.



Oregon sheriffs (9) (as reported by Fox News, online newspaper OregonLive, local radio station KCMB, local
television station KMTR and gun rights organization Oregon Firearms);

    Linn County Sheriff Tim Mueller
    Douglas County Sheriff John Hanlin
    Baker County Sheriff Mitchell Southwick
    Josephine County Sheriff Gil Gilbertson
    Crook County Sheriff Jim Hensley
    Coos County Sheriff Craig Zanni
    Curry County Sheriff John Bishop
    Grant County Sheriff Glenn Palmer
    Washington County Sheriff Pat Garrett

Colorado sheriffs (4) (as reported by local television station KWGN, the El Paso County Sheriff's Official
website, the Mesa County Sheriff's Official Facebook page and the Denver Post);

    El Paso County Colorado Sheriff Terry Maketa
    Larimer County Sheriff Justin Smith
    Mesa County Sheriff Stan Hilkey
    Weld County Sheriff John Cooke

Alabama sheriffs (3)
(as reported by local news station WHNT, gun rights organization Oath Keepers and
media outlet Dothanfirst);

    Madison County Sheriff Blake Dorning
    Morgan County Sheriff Ana Franklin
    Houston County Sheriff Andy Hughes

Califonia sheriffs (3) (according to The Modesto Bee, and local news stations KRNVand KFSN);

    El Dorado County Sheriff John D’Agostini
    Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims
    Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson

Missouri sheriffs (3)
(as reported on BeforeItsNews and news station KOAM and KCTV);

    Johnson County Sheriff Charles Heiss
    Lawrence County Sheriff Brad DeLay
    Livingston County Sheriff Steve Cox

Arizona sheriffs (2) (according to news outlets TPM and Reason);

    Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio
    Yavapai County Sheriff Scott Mascher

Florida sheriffs (2) (according to local news station WPTV and Sheriff McKiethen's personal Facebook page);

    Martin County Sheriff Bill Snyder
    Bay County Florida Sheriff Frank McKiethen

Georgia sheriffs (2) (as reported by the Cherokee Tribune and MinnPost Christian Science Monitor);

    Cherokee County Sheriff Roger Garrison
    Gilmer County Sheriff Stacy Nicholson

Idaho sheriffs (2) (according to news station KIFI and newspaper Idaho Statesman);

    Canyon County, Idaho Sheriff Kieran Donahue
    Madison County Sheriff Roy Klingler

Ohio sheriffs (2) (according to radio station KyPost);

    Boone County Sheriff Michael A. Helmig
    Clermont County Sheriff A.J. Rodenberg

South Carolina sheriffs (2) (according to The Post and Courier and news station WYFF);

    Charleston County Sheriff Al Cannon
    Spartanburg County Sheriff Chuck Wright

Johnson County, Kansas Sheriff Frank Denning,
according to the Kansas City Star;

Jackson County, Kentucky Sheriff Denny Peyman, as reported by NBC News;

Pine County, Minnesota Sheriff Robin Cole, according to NewsMax;

Humboldt County, Nevada Sheriff Ed Kilgore, as reported by local news station KRNV; and

Smith County, Texas Sheriff Larry Smith, as reported by local news station KLTV.

UPDATE: On Jan. 19, 2013, Roosevelt county sheriff Darren Hooker of New Mexico declared that
he will not enforce President Obama's proposed gun control laws or assault weapons ban
, according
to the Portales News-Tribune.



To become a writer for Examiner.com, please click here - http://exm.nr/VH0VQ8.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 32
Box A Rox
January 20, 2013, 6:18pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from Libertarian4life


This really sounds like a trick question but I'm going to say, y...

Nope!


Unconstitutional laws are not legal laws. Any person may disregard any unconstitutional law.

And yes, the constitutionality is decided by each citizen.

Police may believe differently, leading  to arrest, lawsuits, rights violations claims, etc.




So if I don't believe that my income tax is constitutional... I can just not pay it right???

LOL!  Yea right!

DO you guys just make this crap up... or is there a book on 'making up FACTS!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 32
Box A Rox
January 20, 2013, 6:20pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
A repost:

What everybody needs to know about our Constitution and gun control

For those on the board who actually believe anything that comes out of FoxSnooze... Here
are some FACTS:
(By Juan Williams,  January 16, 2013 FoxNews.com)

~Gun control is completely consistent with the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

~The Supreme Court has ruled, several times, that the president, the Congress, state and local
government all have the power to regulate guns.

~Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia acknowledged that the Second Amendment is “not unlimited”
and is  “not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for
whatever purpose.”

~Article II of the U.S. Constitution clearly grants Obama and any other president the authority and
the discretion to issue executive orders with the force of law over the sale of guns and ammunition.

~To be crystal clear: President Obama has the legal authority to enact gun safety measures through
executive order. That is not a matter of opinion. It is a statement of fact.

For all the "hysterical little girls" who have been crying for weeks about Obama & Gun Control... these
FACTS will keep them "crying" and "hysterical" for years.... but that won't change these FACTS.

FoxSnooze:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion.....ion-and-gun-control/


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 32
joebxr
January 20, 2013, 6:33pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Had to stop laughing long enough to post this disclaimer from the quoted site http://www.constitution.org

Disclaimer:
The information on this site is not "legal advice" that might help you achieve favorable outcomes in a court. If you seek an outcome in your case, rather than to take a principled position or to reform the system, you should consult a local lawyer familiar with the facts and "law" in your case, preferably one that is well-connected. For advice on constitutional law, or any legal area, you can perform a lawyer search to find one that specializes in your area of need.


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 32
Libertarian4life
January 20, 2013, 6:34pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


So if I don't believe that my income tax is constitutional... I can just not pay it right???

LOL!  Yea right!


Yes, you can. Then you can argue your case before the courts and get a decision as to the constitutionality.

Any law that conflicts with the Constitution is not a legal law.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 32
Libertarian4life
January 20, 2013, 6:38pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from joebxr
Had to stop laughing long enough to post this disclaimer from the quoted site http://www.constitution.org

Disclaimer:
The information on this site is not "legal advice" that might help you achieve favorable outcomes in a court. If you seek an outcome in your case, rather than to take a principled position or to reform the system, you should consult a local lawyer familiar with the facts and "law" in your case, preferably one that is well-connected. For advice on constitutional law, or any legal area, you can perform a lawyer search to find one that specializes in your area of need.


So you are arguing that unconstitutional laws must be followed because you read a disclaimer?

The Constitution is the law.

Any law that conflicts with it is unconstitutional.


You and Box really hate the Constitution.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 32
Box A Rox
January 20, 2013, 6:42pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from Libertarian4life

Yes, you can. Then you can argue your case before the courts and get a decision as to the constitutionality.
Any law that conflicts with the Constitution is not a legal law.


I had a friend who told me the same thing back in the 80's... He paid over $7000 in lawyer fees,
before they garnished his wages.  (he was a typical John Bircher)
He was just as sure as you are that he could get away with not paying his taxes.  He never went
to jail, but he had to cash in his retirement fund and went broke... He mortgaged  his (paid for)
home...
So go ahead and tell em you don't have to pay no stinkin taxes...
But get a good lawyer first, cause you're gonna need him.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 32
joebxr
January 20, 2013, 6:44pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
No I hate when people post crap from a website to make it seem legit and then I read that disclaimer at the end....laughable at best!!!
and I will state it again, and maybe it will get through you thin skinned thick skull....don't speak for me and what my beliefs are, because you simply do not know. No, wait, let me post it your way:

No I hate when people post crap from a website to make it seem legit and then I read that disclaimer at the end....laughable at best!!!

and I will state it again, and maybe it will get through you thin skinned thick skull....don't speak for me and what my beliefs are, because you simply do not know


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 32
3 Pages 1 2 3 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    ....And In The Rest Of The Country  ›  Criminals continue to ignore gun laws - Providence

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread