Dec 14, 2012 The goal of the course is to enable participants to improve their community’s mitigation and emergency operations plan specifically regarding the needs of children. The course will provide them with the information needed to address the unique needs of children prior to, during and following disasters. It will also provide them guidance and direction on how to form coalitions and how to become advocates for the unique needs of children in all aspects of emergency management.
After completing this course, participants will be able to: • Articulate the importance of providing for the needs of children in disasters in your community’s current emergency management plan.
• Explain what is required to keep children safe in emergencies and why those needs are unique.
• Explain the assumptions, concept of operations, organization and assignment of responsibilities that address the unique needs of children prior to, during and following disasters.
• Explain the planning components necessary to address the unique needs of children prior to, during and following disasters • Incorporate the unique needs of children in disasters into Emergency Operations Plans
• Identify stakeholders and organizations that can assist in preparing for the needs of children in disasters.
• Initiate steps to form coalitions and build teams that have a stake in keeping children safe in disasters
The target audience for this course is local and state emergency managers and planners, Child Services Agencies, NGO’s, Child Care Providers, Schools, and Faith-based Organizations.
Both of the above vids are aimed at Fear Based Americans... those who disregard the truth that is right in front of them, but who will accept just about any other scenario.
OF COURSE GUNS CAN KILL ONE PERSON WHEN ANOTHER PERSON HAS THEIR HANDS ON IT....
OF COURSE A KNIFE CAN KILL ONE PERSON WHEN ANOTHER PERSON HAS THEIR HANDS ON IT....
OF COURSE THE FLU CAN KILL ONE PERSON WHEN EXPOSED TO ANOTHER PERSON WHO IS INFECTED....
OF COURSE E-COLI CAN KILL ONE PERSON WHEN ANOTHER PERSON DOES NOT WASH THEIR HANDS PROPERLY....
OF COURSE A SPLINTERED PIECE OF WOOD CAN KILL ONE PERSON WHEN ANOTHER PERSON HAS THEIR HANDS ON IT....
THAT'S THE TRUTH IN FRONT OF US.....AND THE LIST IS ENDLESS......
the 'safety facade' created by leaders is JUST THAT.....A FACADE......
why go to the MD for tamiflu when you've had the vaccine for the flu????? BECAUSE WE'RE THAT GULLIBLE
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
I just love when the airwaves discuss a serious subject and muddy the waters with conspiracy theories. 911 was a US conspiracy Obama isn't a US Citizen Hillary is faking her concussion... followed by Hillary is faking her blood clot.
When the FACTS don't fit the agenda... make up new FACTS with a good, juicy, evil Conspiracy!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Nah box, history teaches us that the governments lie and creates crisis' to consolidate power and go to war. Remember the book War is a Racket? How about the Gulf of Tonkin? Or Iraq WMD's?
The government has a history of pathological lying.
Conspiracy is not believing the lies of proven liars.
Are eyewitnesses reliable? Every year, more than 75,000 eyewitnesses identify criminal suspects in the U.S., and studies suggest that as many as a third of them are wrong. Mistaken eyewitnesses helped convict three quarters of the 273 people who have been freed from U.S. prisons on DNA evidence presented by the Innocence Project
"Why are so many eyewitnesses mistaken? Human memory is fragile and malleable. More than 2,000 studies on eyewitnesses in recent decades have determined that recollections are prone to decay, distortion, and suggestion. Honest, well-meaning people often simply mis-remember or misreport what they have seen. In one 1974 experiment, for example, more than two thousand people were shown a 13-second video clip of a mugging, followed by a six-man lineup. Just 14 percent of viewers correctly identified the perpetrator — a success rate lower than that of random guessing. In a 1999 study, 150 college students watched videos of a shooting and then of a five-man lineup. Every one of them identified a suspect, even though the culprit was not pictured. Factors such as fear, poor lighting, the presence of a weapon during a crime, and the passage of time have all been shown to cause mistakes in identifications — even when the witness is the victim of the crime. Witnesses are particularly inaccurate, studies show, when asked to remember the facial features of someone of a different race." More: http://theweek.com/article/index/221008/is-eyewitness-testimony-too-unreliable-to-trust
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Are eyewitnesses reliable? Every year, more than 75,000 eyewitnesses identify criminal suspects in the U.S., and studies suggest that as many as a third of them are wrong. Mistaken eyewitnesses helped convict three quarters of the 273 people who have been freed from U.S. prisons on DNA evidence presented by the Innocence Project
"Why are so many eyewitnesses mistaken? Human memory is fragile and malleable. More than 2,000 studies on eyewitnesses in recent decades have determined that recollections are prone to decay, distortion, and suggestion. Honest, well-meaning people often simply mis-remember or misreport what they have seen. In one 1974 experiment, for example, more than two thousand people were shown a 13-second video clip of a mugging, followed by a six-man lineup. Just 14 percent of viewers correctly identified the perpetrator — a success rate lower than that of random guessing. In a 1999 study, 150 college students watched videos of a shooting and then of a five-man lineup. Every one of them identified a suspect, even though the culprit was not pictured. Factors such as fear, poor lighting, the presence of a weapon during a crime, and the passage of time have all been shown to cause mistakes in identifications — even when the witness is the victim of the crime. Witnesses are particularly inaccurate, studies show, when asked to remember the facial features of someone of a different race." More: http://theweek.com/article/index/221008/is-eyewitness-testimony-too-unreliable-to-trust
i believe that all government elected officials and those with government issued uniforms are also human....yes?
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Another brilliant contribution from Joebxr and the crew at McDonalds.
I'm sorry...are you annoyed, but thanks for the compliments? Not sure why it bothers you. Mirrors much of you and what you post, so you should be very comfortable. I think it would be perfect for your signature!
I'll call your local MickeyD's and tell them to watch for you...special menu JUST FOR YOU!!!!
2 guys came by my office when I was reading this....they are laughing hysterically. Specific comment from one..."I can't believe there are really people around that think like him!"
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
So you have a problem with people asking questions, even those who were right there in the sh*t? Many people involved in these shootings believed there were more then 1 shooter but since it didn't follow the governments version we should dismiss their stories.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
So you have a problem with people asking questions, even those who were right there in the sh*t? Many people involved in these shootings believed there were more then 1 shooter but since it didn't follow the governments version we should dismiss their stories.
Who? Every interview I've seen or read from reputable people that were there, (children, adults and first responders, etc.), I have not heard or read one word that indicated anyone thought there was more than the one sick individual that did this. What facts did I miss? The only place I find any "conspiracy" type comments (aside from this forum), are from people with blogs and other media.
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
I wonder how many of those 2 friends died in Vietnam because some didn't ask questions till later on, come to find out that the whole war was over a bs story. But we are the nutjobs for not believing everything the government tells us.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Logged
