Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Welfare Government’s Single Largest Budget Item
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  Welfare Government’s Single Largest Budget Item Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 54 Guests

Welfare Government’s Single Largest Budget Item  This thread currently has 513 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Shadow
October 18, 2012, 7:14am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Report: Welfare government’s single largest budget item in FY 2011 at approx. $1.03 trillion
12:00 AM 10/18/2012

The government spent approximately $1.03 trillion on 83 means-tested federal welfare programs in fiscal year 2011 alone — a price tag that makes welfare that year the government’s largest expenditure, according to new data released by the Republican side of the Senate Budget Committee.

The total sum taxpayers spent on federal welfare programs was derived from a new Congressional Research Service (CRS) report on federal welfare spending — which topped out at $745.84 billion for fiscal year 2011 — combined with an analysis from the Republican Senate Budget Committee staff of state spending on federal welfare programs (based on “The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government Finance”), which reached $282.7 billion in fiscal year 2011.

The data excludes spending on Social Security, Medicare, means-tested health care for veterans without service-connected disabilities, and the means-tested veterans pension program.
Ads by Google

    Charles KrauthammerListen to Conservative Talk Shows Right From Your Browser - For Free! http://www.ConservativeTalkNow.com
    Infrared Heaters- 40% OffIn Stock- Starting At Only $56 Now. EZ Pay Option- 3 Low Payments. http://www.theinfraredheaterstore.com

According to the CRS report, which focused solely on federal spending for federal welfare programs, spending on federal welfare programs increased $563.413 billion in fiscal year 2008 to $745.84 billion in fiscal year 2011 — a 32 percent increase.

Further, spending on the 10 largest federal welfare programs has doubled as a share of the federal budget in the last 30 years: In inflation-adjusted dollars, according to Republican staff on the Senate Budget Committee, the amount spent on these programs has increased 378 percent in that 30 year time frame.

CRS reports that food assistance programs — the third largest welfare category behind health and cash assistance — experienced the greatest increase in spending, with 71 percent more spending in 2011 than in 2008. The agency explained that this spending increase was largely due to the growth in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps.

CRS further noted that the largest expenditure category, health, was 37 percent higher in fiscal year 2011 than fiscal year 2008. In that same period, cash aid increased 12 percent, education assistance increased 57 percent, housing and development assistance increased 2 percent, social services increased 3 percent, employment and training remained the same (though fluctuated in intervening years), and energy assistance was 67 percent higher in fiscal year 2011 than fiscal year 2008.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10.....llion/#ixzz29eiqbn7y
Logged
Private Message
Box A Rox
October 18, 2012, 7:18am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Just WHO is on welfare?  Democrats?  Republicans???

The states with the largest concentration of Republicans are the poorest states and the states who have
the highest numbers on welfare.
Republican red states suck on the Federal Govt for entitlements... Blue states like NY pay for those entitlements.



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 14
CICERO
October 18, 2012, 9:55am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
So what's your position box?  Do you think it is "fair" that federal money is distributed unevenly?  

I agree with you, the "red states" should give the federal money back so they don't receive more than they contribute.  I guess that would beg the question, what's the point of paying taxes into the federal system if you are just going to receive the same amount back with strings attached.  

The federal government is more than happy giving more money to the red states because the whole purpose is to create a dependency on the federal government.  The citizens in the blue states have been adequately conditioned to depend on the government entitlement system.  They have become so dependant that they couldn't survive without it. That equals success.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 14
Box A Rox
October 18, 2012, 9:56am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
So what's your position box?  


I stated my position:

"The states with the largest concentration of Republicans are the poorest states and the states who have
the highest numbers on welfare."


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 14
CICERO
October 18, 2012, 10:04am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


I stated my position:

"The states with the largest concentration of Republicans are the poorest states and the states who have
the highest numbers on welfare."


That's a statement not a position.  Do you support it or oppose it?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 14
Box A Rox
October 18, 2012, 10:20am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


That's a statement not a position.  Do you support it or oppose it?


I support Federal programs that help the poorest Americans.  I think it's ironic that Right Wingers in
those poor states who are on welfare, will vote for a candidate who promises to cut them off of welfare...
but not much of what Right Wingers do makes sense.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 14
CICERO
October 18, 2012, 10:38am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


I support Federal programs that help the poorest Americans.  I think it's ironic that Right Wingers in
those poor states who are on welfare, will vote for a candidate who promises to cut them off of welfare...
but not much of what Right Wingers do makes sense.


I think it's ironic that the left wingers that believe in "equality" and paying their "fair share" would support such inequality and unfairness with redistribution.  New York has 10 times as many welfare recipients than New Mexico, don't they deserve a greater share of federal money?  Shouldn't New Yorkers be outraged that they are carrying a greater burden than New Mexico?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/01/25/us/20090126-welfare-table.html


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 14
Libertarian4life
October 18, 2012, 11:29am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
Report: Welfare government’s single largest budget item in FY 2011 at approx. $1.03 trillion
12:00 AM 10/18/2012

The government spent approximately $1.03 trillion on 83 means-tested federal welfare programs in fiscal year 2011 alone — a price tag that makes welfare that year the government’s largest expenditure, according to new data released by the Republican side of the Senate Budget Committee.

The total sum taxpayers spent on federal welfare programs was derived from a new Congressional Research Service (CRS) report on federal welfare spending — which topped out at $745.84 billion for fiscal year 2011 — combined with an analysis from the Republican Senate Budget Committee staff of state spending on federal welfare programs (based on “The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government Finance”), which reached $282.7 billion in fiscal year 2011.

The data excludes spending on Social Security, Medicare, means-tested health care for veterans without service-connected disabilities, and the means-tested veterans pension program.
Ads by Google

    Charles KrauthammerListen to Conservative Talk Shows Right From Your Browser - For Free! http://www.ConservativeTalkNow.com
    Infrared Heaters- 40% OffIn Stock- Starting At Only $56 Now. EZ Pay Option- 3 Low Payments. http://www.theinfraredheaterstore.com

According to the CRS report, which focused solely on federal spending for federal welfare programs, spending on federal welfare programs increased $563.413 billion in fiscal year 2008 to $745.84 billion in fiscal year 2011 — a 32 percent increase.

Further, spending on the 10 largest federal welfare programs has doubled as a share of the federal budget in the last 30 years: In inflation-adjusted dollars, according to Republican staff on the Senate Budget Committee, the amount spent on these programs has increased 378 percent in that 30 year time frame.

CRS reports that food assistance programs — the third largest welfare category behind health and cash assistance — experienced the greatest increase in spending, with 71 percent more spending in 2011 than in 2008. The agency explained that this spending increase was largely due to the growth in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps.

CRS further noted that the largest expenditure category, health, was 37 percent higher in fiscal year 2011 than fiscal year 2008. In that same period, cash aid increased 12 percent, education assistance increased 57 percent, housing and development assistance increased 2 percent, social services increased 3 percent, employment and training remained the same (though fluctuated in intervening years), and energy assistance was 67 percent higher in fiscal year 2011 than fiscal year 2008.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10.....llion/#ixzz29eiqbn7y



Corporate bailouts(welfare) were much higher than welfare costs for the Obama term.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 14
bumblethru
October 18, 2012, 11:58am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Hey....when GOV ALMIGHTY flashes the 'FREE' banner...........the entitleists step right up....dem or rep...........it's a mind thought!!

That's how GOV ALMIGHTY wins and owns the heart, soul and mind of the sheople!! Poor mindless bastards!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 14
senders
October 18, 2012, 4:38pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
Just WHO is on welfare?  Democrats?  Republicans???

The states with the largest concentration of Republicans are the poorest states and the states who have
the highest numbers on welfare.
Republican red states suck on the Federal Govt for entitlements... Blue states like NY pay for those entitlements.



either way it doesn't matter....both parties parley with the institution for votes....haven't you got that yet? or
do you subscribe to the 'name the subsidies program' and are OK with it as long as the rhetoric sounds 'right'?


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 14
BuckStrider
October 18, 2012, 5:16pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
One would think that spending over $1T per year on welfare, there would be no more poor.




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 14
senders
October 18, 2012, 5:20pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider
One would think that spending over $1T per year on welfare, there would be no more poor.


the human appetite is insatiable


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 14
Libertarian4life
October 18, 2012, 7:18pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider
One would think that spending over $1T per year on welfare, there would be no more poor.


Operational costs = $650 million

Benefits to people = $350 million

Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 14
CICERO
October 18, 2012, 7:33pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Libertarian4life


Operational costs = $650 million

Benefits to people = $350 million


What is done with the other 999 Billion?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 14
senders
October 19, 2012, 3:23am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from CICERO

What is done with the other 999 Billion?


ADVERTISING


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 14
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  Welfare Government’s Single Largest Budget Item

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread