Will The Election Results Cause Massive Riots To Erupt All Over America? Michael Snyder The Economic Collapse Oct 12, 2012
Will the most divisive campaign in modern American history culminate in massive riots in our major cities? Right now, supporters of Barack Obama and supporters of Mitt Romney are both pinning all of their hopes on a victory on November 6th. The race for the presidency is extremely tight, and obviously the side that loses is going to be extremely disappointed when the election results are finalized. But could this actually lead to violence? Could we actually see rioting in communities all over America? Well, the conditions are certainly ripe for it. A whole host of surveys over the past few years have shown that Americans are very angry and very frustrated right now. In fact, a Pew Research Center poll from late last year found that86 percent of all Americans are either angry or frustrated with the federal government. We have seen this frustration manifest in protest movements such as the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street, but right now things are fairly calm as liberals and conservatives both look forward to November 6th. Many Republicans started the countdown to the next election literally the day after John McCain lost back in 2008. All of their hopes of getting Obama out of the White House are riding on a Romney victory. For many Democrats, Barack Obama is a “once in a generation” icon. Just the thought of Mitt Romney replacing Obama in the White House is enough to push many of them to the brink of insanity. In recent years we have seen horrible rioting erupt in cities after major sports championship games. How much worse could the rioting potentially be if this bitterly contested election is decided by a very narrow margin – especially if there are allegations that the election is “stolen”?.................................>>>>....................>>>>.....................http://www.infowars.com/will-the-election-results-cause-massive-riots-to-erupt-all-over-america/
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Ya gotta love the play on words from the lame stream media......RIOTS???
How bout using the word.....REVOLUTION!!!
YUP.......there just could be a REVOLUTION after the election!
A REVOLUTION to restore this great country.....has a different tone than RIOTS........yes????!!!
Gotta love the lame stream media!!
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
I would think if the USA were going to riot, it would have been in the stolen election of 2000. Half a million more Americans voted for the loser (Al Gore) than voted for the winner (GWB).
The actual total vote that decided who was elected to the office of US President in the year 2000 was: 5 to 4.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
I would think if the USA were going to riot, it would have been in the stolen election of 2000. Half a million more Americans voted for the loser (Al Gore) than voted for the winner (GWB).
The actual total vote that decided who was elected to the office of US President in the year 2000 was: 5 to 4.
LOL...And you are probably going to vote this year even after admitting that U.S. elections are rigged. We can go back to the Kennedy election for another example of rigged elections.
Even after this reality hits people square between the eyes they eventually deny it and buy back into the fraud. That's too bad.
I would think if the USA were going to riot, it would have been in the stolen election of 2000. Half a million more Americans voted for the loser (Al Gore) than voted for the winner (GWB).
The actual total vote that decided who was elected to the office of US President in the year 2000 was: 5 to 4.
if standing in line for food stamps was so bad....YES there would be riots.......
status quo can't be bothered.....
at least, at least, at least, at least.......we've accepted the at leasts.....why?....because the phantom 1% keeps just enough straw along with proper rhetoric to keep the status quo accepting of the 40oz laws passed by our elected masters.....
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
New Threats to Riot if Obama Loses Election Buzz explodes across web Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com October 15, 2012
Despite the issue receiving national media attention, Obama supporters continue to threaten to riot if Mitt Romney wins the presidential election, raising the prospect of civil unrest if Obama fails to secure a second term.
The new threats continue to dominate Twitter and the vast majority make no reference to press coverage of the issue over the last week, illustrating the fact that they are a legitimate expression of how many Obama voters plan to respond if Romney comes out on top, and not merely a reaction to media hype......................>>>>..................>>>>.............http://www.infowars.com/new-threats-to-riot-if-obama-loses-election/
David Siegel, the owner of Westgate Resorts, sent a surprising email to his employees Monday. It said that if President Barack Obama wins re-election and raises Siegel's taxes, he will have to lay off workers and downsize his company — or even shut it down. "If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, as our current President plans, I will have no choice but to reduce the size of this company," he wrote. "Rather than grow this company I will be forced to cut back. This means fewer jobs, less benefits and certainly less opportunity for everyone." In a version of Romney's "47 percent" remarks, Siegel added that "people like me who made all the right decisions and invested in themselves are being forced to bail out all the people who didn't. The people that overspent their paychecks suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed 42 years of my life for."
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
The people that overspent their paychecks suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed 42 years of my life for."
and you don't find that to be a truth?....even if it's 30%...? his value is in his money that HE managed....the system was there and he used it....SO DID OBAMA.....SO DID CLINTON.....I bet they gave/donated 1/2% more to charities so they are better validated by the public....
PROGRESSIVE IS SUBJECTIVE
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
Logged
