Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
10Largest US Corporations Paid 9% Tax Rate
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    ....And In The Rest Of The Country  ›  10Largest US Corporations Paid 9% Tax Rate Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 97 Guests

10Largest US Corporations Paid 9% Tax Rate  This thread currently has 1,203 views. |
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
Box A Rox
August 7, 2012, 5:53pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
America’s 10 most profitable corporations paid an average corporate income tax rate of just 9
percent in 2011, according to a study from financial site NerdWallet reported by the Huffington
Post. The 10 companies include Wall Street banks like Wells Fargo and JP Morgan Chase, oil
companies like ExxonMobil and Chevron, and tech companies like Apple, IBM, and Microsoft.

The two companies with the lowest tax rates were both oil companies. ExxonMobil paid $1.5
billion in taxes on $73.3 billion in earnings, a tax rate of 2 percent. Chevron’s tax rate was just 4
percent. None of the companies paid anywhere near the 35 percent top corporate tax rate,
providing more evidence to debunk claims that America’s corporate tax rate is stunting
economic growth and job creation (Despite the high marginal rate, American corporations
pay one of the lowest effective corporate tax rates in the world
).


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message
Rusty Shackleford
August 7, 2012, 6:05pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
Thanks to a “sweetheart” tax deal worked out between General Motors and government, the Detroit auto manufacturer won’t have to pay $45.4 billion in taxes on future profits, according to recent reports from the Wall Street Journal and CNN Money.

As it turns out, not only did the feds give the failing company billions of taxpayers dollars, all while firing executives and replacing them with government-backed officials, but they also gave what some call “preferential treatment” in the form of tax breaks, according to documents filed with federal regulators.

“The tax benefit stems from so-called tax-loss carry-forwards and other provisions, which allow companies to use losses in prior years and costs related to pensions and other expenses to shield profits from U.S. taxes for up to 20 years,” Randall Smith and Sharon Terlep write in the WSJ.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/preferential-treatment-gm-scores-sweetheart-tax-deal/



Quoted Text
Mr. Obama's choice of Immelt came under scrutiny Friday in the wake of a front-page story in the New York Times reporting that despite $14.2 billion in worldwide profits - including more than $5 billion from U.S. operations - GE did not owe taxes in 2010.

In fact, the story said, G.E. claimed a tax benefit of $3.2 billion.


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20047212-503544.html
Logged
E-mail Reply: 1 - 17
Rusty Shackleford
August 7, 2012, 6:05pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
And a LARGE portion of the Schenectady tax base is "tax free" non profits.

Great leadership.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 2 - 17
senders
August 7, 2012, 6:07pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
of course....what is everyone thinking?

really?

so income tax IS fair...like it should be OK to collect based upon some F'EN fairness scale?

do you seriously think that the populace would know the difference if we were talking about 9% of our buttons...we won't say
dollars because the value of such is MADE UP....

the discussion about the 1% vs 99% is an f'en diversion....

so when the communes are all crying Robin Hood Robin Hood....really?

I say ditch income tax which is a diversion and election tactic NOT TO MENTION subjective based upon the value of our
$$$ at the time....

DITCH INCOME TAX......

let me know how fair you are maybe I'll vote for you.....


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 17
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
August 7, 2012, 8:33pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
Those 10 largest US Corporations need to fire their lawyers, tax accountants and lobbyists --- they are paying way too much tax.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 4 - 17
rampage
August 8, 2012, 12:54pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,773
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+7 / -3
Time Online
61 days 1 hours 26 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
America’s 10 most profitable corporations paid an average corporate income tax rate of just 9
percent in 2011,


That's 9% too high.  Corporations are not people, therefore should not be subject to the IRS.  


Reignite Rotterdam
c/o MARY L. FAHY


Kidney Wheels, (800) 999-9697
http://www.HealthyKidneys.org


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 17
Box A Rox
August 8, 2012, 12:58pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from rampage


That's 9% too high.  Corporations are not people, therefore should not be subject to the IRS.  


A great thought... Since "Corporations are not people" THEY SHOULDN'T BE SUCKING UP ALL THAT TAXPAYER
FUNDED CORPORATE WELFARE.  



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 17
rampage
August 8, 2012, 1:00pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,773
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+7 / -3
Time Online
61 days 1 hours 26 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


A great thought... Since "Corporations are not people" THEY SHOULDN'T BE SUCKING UP ALL THAT TAXPAYER
FUNDED CORPORATE WELFARE.  



And on this point, we agree.  They shouldn't be accepting bailouts, either.


Reignite Rotterdam
c/o MARY L. FAHY


Kidney Wheels, (800) 999-9697
http://www.HealthyKidneys.org


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 17
CICERO
August 8, 2012, 1:03pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from rampage


And on this point, we agree.  They shouldn't be accepting bailouts, either.


...only if that bailout transfers the money and ownership of the company to organized labor.  Then it is a nobel corporation that "saved jobs".  Ya know, like GM.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 17
Box A Rox
August 8, 2012, 1:06pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from rampage


And on this point, we agree.  They shouldn't be accepting bailouts, either.


IMO, the roll of govt sometimes intercedes in private business.  Govt regulation when NEEDED or govt
assistance when it is in the public good is sometimes acceptable.  One million AUTO jobs lost, on top of the
Bush Economic Melt Down, and ending the US auto manufacturing business is one of those cases.

Subsidizing oil companies at a time when they are making record profits is NOT!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 17
rampage
August 8, 2012, 1:44pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,773
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+7 / -3
Time Online
61 days 1 hours 26 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


IMO, the roll of govt sometimes intercedes in private business.  Govt regulation when NEEDED or govt
assistance when it is in the public good is sometimes acceptable.  One million AUTO jobs lost, on top of the
Bush Economic Melt Down, and ending the US auto manufacturing business is one of those cases.

Subsidizing oil companies at a time when they are making record profits is NOT!


Ever think that the reason that they "needed" to intercede is due to the fact that they have already interceded too much?  What if they could pay less to the employees as a company, you know, to not cover things such as Medicare money that has to come out of the paycheck, or a minimum wage for certain workers, and could pay only what they thought was a fair wage (you know, an amount agreed on between the employer and the employee)?  What if they didn't have government mandated workers compensation insurance and could spend that money on bettering their output / safety in the factories?

Also, you do realize that the Government is actually the major issue with the gas prices so high, right?  Well, we won't be seeing a removal of any of the sales tax off of our gas in Schenectady County this year, but maybe we'll see it for a few months next year.  After all, it is an election season.  They've pulled that one before.


Reignite Rotterdam
c/o MARY L. FAHY


Kidney Wheels, (800) 999-9697
http://www.HealthyKidneys.org


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 17
Box A Rox
August 8, 2012, 1:50pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from rampage


Ever think that the reason that they "needed" to intercede is due to the fact that they have already interceded too much?  What if they could pay less to the employees as a company, you know, to not cover things such as Medicare money that has to come out of the paycheck, or a minimum wage for certain workers, and could pay only what they thought was a fair wage (you know, an amount agreed on between the employer and the employee)?  What if they didn't have government mandated workers compensation insurance and could spend that money on bettering their output / safety in the factories?

Also, you do realize that the Government is actually the major issue with the gas prices so high, right?  Well, we won't be seeing a removal of any of the sales tax off of our gas in Schenectady County this year, but maybe we'll see it for a few months next year.  After all, it is an election season.  They've pulled that one before.


~"Ever think that the reason that they "needed" to intercede is due to the fact that they have
already interceded too much?"

Corporations with the help of Conservative SUPPLY SIDERS have been distorting the role of govt for years.
Corporate welfare wasn't just  for companies like the US Auto business who actually needed it... Corporate
Welfare has become a way of life for all US corporations... distorting the real role of business, labor and
govt.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 17
A Better Rotterdam
August 8, 2012, 5:21pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
903
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+6 / -4
Time Online
38 days 7 hours 17 minutes
Yawn, this will never change as long as morons keep voting for Democrats and Republicans....
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 17
Libertarian4life
August 8, 2012, 6:12pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from rampage


That's 9% too high.  Corporations are not people, therefore should not be subject to the IRS.  


Corporations are an invention of the government that allows favoritism.

Partnerships are a completely different entity.

Corporations allow individuals to make money and not pay income tax; thereby treating the corporate members, as better than equals, to everyone else.

Corporations should be illegal.

How can the government invent an entity and sell it to people that shields them from their actions and liabilities?

I can incorporate myself and take money from people for services or goods and pay no taxes on anything except for actual profit.

As long as I spend all the profits, I will never pay taxes.

Corporate protectionist licenses are purchased from the government.

Corporations allow the members to be more equal than non corporations under the law.




Logged
Private Message Reply: 13 - 17
Libertarian4life
August 8, 2012, 6:17pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


IMO, the roll of govt sometimes intercedes in private business.  Govt regulation when NEEDED or govt
assistance when it is in the public good is sometimes acceptable.  One million AUTO jobs lost, on top of the
Bush Economic Melt Down, and ending the US auto manufacturing business is one of those cases.

Subsidizing oil companies at a time when they are making record profits is NOT!


Government loans are the only intervention that should be allowed.

Government giveaways should be illegal.

That is your basic theft and redistribution of wealth.

Taxes should not be forgiven.

Grants should not be given.

Corporations are not people.

They have no right to welfare.

Never mind the separation of church and state, there needs to be separation of corporations and state.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 17
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    ....And In The Rest Of The Country  ›  10Largest US Corporations Paid 9% Tax Rate

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread